Visualization of coronary arteries in paediatric patients using whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of image-navigation and the standard approach for respiratory motion compensation.


Journal

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
ISSN: 1532-429X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 02 2019
Historique:
received: 09 10 2018
accepted: 05 02 2019
entrez: 26 2 2019
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 29 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To investigate the use of respiratory motion compensation using image-based navigation (iNAV) with constant respiratory efficiency using single end-expiratory thresholding (CRUISE) for coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA), and compare it to the conventional diaphragmatic navigator (dNAV) in paediatric patients with congenital or suspected heart disease. iNAV allowed direct tracking of the respiratory heart motion and was generated using balanced steady state free precession startup echoes. Respiratory gating was achieved using CRUISE with a fixed 50% efficiency. Whole-heart CMRA was acquired with 1.3 mm isotropic resolution. For comparison, CMRA with identical imaging parameters were acquired using dNAV. Scan time, visualization of coronary artery origins and mid-course, imaging quality and sharpness was compared between the two sequences. Forty patients (13 females; median weight: 44 kg; median age: 12.6, range: 3 months-17 years) were enrolled. 25 scans were performed in awake patients. A contrast agent was used in 22 patients. The scan time was significantly reduced using iNAV for awake patients (iNAV 7:48 ± 1:26 vs dNAV 9:48 ± 3:11, P = 0.01) but not for patients under general anaesthesia (iNAV = 6:55 ± 1:50 versus dNAV = 6:32 ± 2:16; P = 0.32). In 98% of the cases, iNAV image quality had an equal or higher score than dNAV. The visual score analysis showed a clear difference, favouring iNAV (P = 0.002). The right coronary artery and the left anterior descending vessel sharpness was significantly improved (iNAV: 56.8% ± 10.1% vs dNAV: 53.7% ± 9.9%, P < 0.002 and iNAV: 55.8% ± 8.6% vs dNAV: 53% ± 9.2%, P = 0.001, respectively). iNAV allows for a higher success-rate and clearer depiction of the mid-course of coronary arteries in paediatric patients. Its acquisition time is shorter in awake patients and image quality score is equal or superior to the conventional method in most cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30798789
doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0525-8
pii: 10.1186/s12968-019-0525-8
pmc: PMC6388473
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Organometallic Compounds 0
gadobutrol 1BJ477IO2L
Meglumine 6HG8UB2MUY
gadoterate meglumine L0ND3981AG

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

13

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT 088641/Z/09/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RE/08/03
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):331-51
pubmed: 19188310
Heart. 2017 Mar;103(5):341-346
pubmed: 27540181
Heart. 2010 Feb;96(4):269-74
pubmed: 19687017
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jun;71(6):2118-26
pubmed: 23878103
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jul 09;17:55
pubmed: 26156377
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 May;38:129-137
pubmed: 28034638
BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):36
pubmed: 30326847
Radiology. 1996 Jan;198(1):55-60
pubmed: 8539406
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Apr;69(4):1083-93
pubmed: 22648856
Magn Reson Med. 2017 May;77(5):1884-1893
pubmed: 27174673
Front Pediatr. 2017 Feb 27;5:36
pubmed: 28289674
Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):733-6
pubmed: 9169696
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Feb;29(2):320-7
pubmed: 19161183
N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 27;345(26):1863-9
pubmed: 11756576
Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):547-54
pubmed: 22517963
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Nov;76(5):1345-1353
pubmed: 27455164
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):416-422
pubmed: 28321900
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Nov;74(5):1306-16
pubmed: 25376772
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Oct;48(4):658-66
pubmed: 12353283
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Aug;54(2):476-80
pubmed: 16032682
Br J Radiol. 2012 May;85(1013):495-510
pubmed: 22253353
World J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 26;6(10):1060-6
pubmed: 25349650
Sensors (Basel). 2013 May 24;13(6):6882-99
pubmed: 23708271
Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):240-7
pubmed: 21325034
BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Oct 27;15:48
pubmed: 26502883
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):624-9
pubmed: 17729350
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Aug;78(2):472-483
pubmed: 27529745
Circulation. 2004 Jul 13;110(2):163-9
pubmed: 15210590
Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):378-86
pubmed: 24471387
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Feb;67(2):437-45
pubmed: 21656563
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):947-55
pubmed: 26451972

Auteurs

Mari Nieves Velasco Forte (MN)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBIS, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Israel Valverde (I)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBIS, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Nanda Prabhu (N)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Teresa Correia (T)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Srinivas Ananth Narayan (SA)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Aaron Bell (A)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Sujeev Mathur (S)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Reza Razavi (R)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Tarique Hussain (T)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1935 Medical District Drive, Dallas, USA.

Kuberan Pushparajah (K)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Markus Henningsson (M)

Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. markus.henningsson@kcl.ac.uk.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. markus.henningsson@kcl.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH