Evaluation of Restorative Materials Containing Preventive Additives in a Secondary Caries Model in vitro.


Journal

Caries research
ISSN: 1421-976X
Titre abrégé: Caries Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0103374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 19 07 2018
accepted: 19 12 2018
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 7 7 2020
entrez: 26 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The incorporation of antibacterial agents into dental restorative materials is a promising strategy for secondary caries prevention. Previously, Carolacton affected Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation on composite materials in vitro. The present study evaluated secondary caries formation adjacent to Carolacton-containing composites and conventional restorative materials using an artificial biofilm model. Standardized cavities were prepared in bovine dentin-enamel samples (n = 175) and restored with various dental materials (Tetric EvoCeram [T], GrandioSo composite without [G] and with Carolacton [GC], Grandio Flow without [F] and with Carolacton [FC], GrandioSo containing sodium fluoride [GNaF], and Ketac Fil [K]). After artificial aging, S. mutans was grown on the samples for 7 days. The investigation of gap sizes and secondary caries formation was performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy and transversal microradiography. Median gap size in enamel was 9.4 µm (interquartile range 7.9-12.7). Compared to all other groups significant differences in gap sizes could be observed for Ketac Fil (p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test). Only GrandioSo composite containing 30% sodium fluoride and Ketac Fil showed significantly smaller lesion areas in enamel (p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test) than all other groups which was confirmed by the mineral loss data (p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test). Based on the present in vitro results, it seems that Carolacton-containing composite in the current formulation within the shown simplified monoculture biofilm model is not able to prevent caries formation compared to fluoride-releasing restorative materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30799391
pii: 000496401
doi: 10.1159/000496401
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cariostatic Agents 0
Composite Resins 0
Dental Materials 0
Glass Ionomer Cements 0
Grandio 0
Grandioso Flow 0
Macrolides 0
Tetric EvoCeram 0
carolacton 0
Sodium Fluoride 8ZYQ1474W7
Fluorides Q80VPU408O

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

447-456

Informations de copyright

© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Franziska Hetrodt (F)

Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, fhetrodt@ukaachen.de.

Julian Lausch (J)

Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel (H)

Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Georg Conrads (G)

Division of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Christian Apel (C)

Department of Biohybrid and Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute of RWTH Aachen University and Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH