Environmental impacts of dietary shifts in India: A modelling study using nationally-representative data.
Dietary guidelines
Dietary intake
Greenhouse gas emissions
India
Land use
Sustainable diets
Water use
Journal
Environment international
ISSN: 1873-6750
Titre abrégé: Environ Int
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7807270
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
revised:
31
01
2019
accepted:
01
02
2019
pubmed:
26
2
2019
medline:
18
10
2019
entrez:
26
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Food production is a major driver of environmental change, and unhealthy diets are the leading cause of global disease burden. In high-income countries (HICs), modelling studies suggest that adoption of healthy diets could improve population health and reduce environmental footprints associated with food production. We assessed whether such benefits from dietary change could occur in India, where under-nutrition and overweight and obesity are simultaneously prevalent. We calculated the potential changes in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, blue and green water footprints (WFs), and land use (LU), that would result from shifting current national food consumption patterns in India to healthy diets (meeting dietary guidelines) and to "affluent diets" (those consumed by the wealthiest quartile of households, which may represent future purchasing power and nutritional trajectories). Dietary data were derived from the 2011-12 nationally-representative household expenditure survey, and we assessed dietary scenarios nationally and across six Indian sub-regions, by rural or urban location, and for those consuming above or below recommended dietary energy intakes. We modelled the changes in consumption of 34 food groups necessary to meet Indian dietary guidelines, as well as an affluent diet representative of those in the highest wealth quartile. These changes were combined with food-specific data on GHG emissions, calculated using the Cool Farm Tool, and WF and LU adapted from the Water Footprint Network and Food and Agriculture Organization, respectively. Shifting to healthy guidelines nationally required a minor increase in dietary energy (3%), with larger increases in fruit (18%) and vegetable (72%) intake, though baseline proportion of dietary energy from fat and protein was adequate and did not change significantly. Meeting healthy guidelines slightly increased environmental footprints by about 3-5% across GHG emissions, blue and green WFs, and LU. However, these national averages masked substantial variation within sub-populations. For example, shifting to healthy diets among those with dietary energy intake below recommended guidelines would result in increases of 28% in GHG emissions, 18 and 34% in blue and green WFs, respectively, and 41% in LU. Decreased environmental impacts were seen among those who currently consume above recommended dietary energy (-6 to -16% across footprints). Adoption of affluent diets by the whole population would result in increases of 19-36% across the environmental indicators. Specific food groups contributing to these shifts varied by scenario. Environmental impacts also varied markedly between six major Indian sub-regions. In India, where undernutrition is prevalent, widespread adoption of healthy diets may lead to small increases in the environmental footprints of the food system relative to the status quo, although much larger increases would occur if there was widespread adoption of diets currently consumed by the wealthiest quartile of the population. To achieve lower diet-related disease burdens and reduced environmental footprints of the food system, greater efficiency of food production and reductions in food waste are likely to be required alongside promotion of healthy diets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30802638
pii: S0160-4120(18)31441-7
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.004
pmc: PMC6437131
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Air Pollutants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
207-215Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 17;51(20):12035-12045
pubmed: 28902497
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):6868-72
pubmed: 22509032
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):518-22
pubmed: 25383533
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0165797
pubmed: 27812156
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:259-277
pubmed: 28125383
Br J Nutr. 2017 Apr;117(7):1013-1019
pubmed: 28462737
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 May;1395(1):49-59
pubmed: 28306140
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 19;50(8):4269-77
pubmed: 27054575
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;577:289-298
pubmed: 27802883
Environ Res Lett. 2018 Apr;13(4):044004
pubmed: 29853988
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jun 1;587-588:128-136
pubmed: 28215793
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4146-51
pubmed: 27001851
Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855
pubmed: 25592418
Nature. 2018 May;557(7707):651-659
pubmed: 29769728
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Feb;5(1A):93-103
pubmed: 12027297
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 1;643:1411-1418
pubmed: 30189557
Lancet. 2015 Nov 14;386(10007):1973-2028
pubmed: 26188744
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 15;2(3):e000184
pubmed: 29225943
Elife. 2014 May 07;3:e02245
pubmed: 24867639
Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017 Jan 16;237:234-241
pubmed: 28148994
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20888-93
pubmed: 24344273
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Mar;3(3):e132-42
pubmed: 25701991
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Feb;7(1A):245-50
pubmed: 14972063
J Nutr. 2002 Dec;132(12):3764-71
pubmed: 12468621
Obes Rev. 2014 Jul;15(7):564-77
pubmed: 24735161
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 19;7:11382
pubmed: 27092437
PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e62228
pubmed: 23700408
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6804-6809
pubmed: 29891659
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0129487
pubmed: 26083456
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2793-807
pubmed: 20713385
Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Apr;1(1):e26-e32
pubmed: 28480453