Screening for periodontal diseases by non-dental health professionals: a protocol for a systematic review and overview of reviews.
Gingivitis
Periodontal diseases
Periodontitis
Screening
Screening tools
Systematic review
Treatment
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 02 2019
25 02 2019
Historique:
received:
11
12
2017
accepted:
14
02
2019
entrez:
27
2
2019
pubmed:
26
2
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Periodontal diseases are responsible for a vast burden of disease globally and are associated with other severe illnesses such as cardiovascular diseases or diabetes. Tests for early diagnosis of periodontal diseases and effective treatments are available. The effectiveness of screening for periodontal diseases to detect periodontal diseases at an early stage during periodic health examinations at primary care facilities, however, is unclear. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the benefits and risks of screening for periodontal diseases in adults during the periodic health examinations. We will use two methodological approaches: (1) a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and risk of harms of screening for periodontal diseases during periodic health examinations and (2) an overview of systematic reviews to determine the effectiveness of treatment approaches for early periodontal disease. We will search electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase.com , the Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, PubMed (non-MEDLINE content)) for published studies as well as sources for grey literature to detect unpublished studies. Two authors will independently screen abstracts and full texts using pre-defined eligibility criteria, select studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias of included studies or reviews. In general, we will conduct a systematic narrative synthesis. Criteria for conducting meta-analyses were defined a priori. Our primary outcomes of interest are tooth loss, loosening of teeth, and depletion of bone tissue. Secondary outcomes are gingivitis/gum inflammation, pocket depths, dental hygiene, lifestyle modifications (e.g., smoking, alcohol, nutrition), and toothache. We consulted a panel of experts and patient representatives to prioritize these outcomes. Two investigators will assess independently the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. We anticipate that our review will highlight the gaps in the available evidence about the effectiveness of screening for periodontal diseases during periodic health examinations. Implications for screening programs may be based on linked evidence about the validity of available screening tools and the effectiveness of early treatment. PROSPERO CRD42017081150.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Periodontal diseases are responsible for a vast burden of disease globally and are associated with other severe illnesses such as cardiovascular diseases or diabetes. Tests for early diagnosis of periodontal diseases and effective treatments are available. The effectiveness of screening for periodontal diseases to detect periodontal diseases at an early stage during periodic health examinations at primary care facilities, however, is unclear. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the benefits and risks of screening for periodontal diseases in adults during the periodic health examinations.
METHODS
We will use two methodological approaches: (1) a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and risk of harms of screening for periodontal diseases during periodic health examinations and (2) an overview of systematic reviews to determine the effectiveness of treatment approaches for early periodontal disease. We will search electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase.com , the Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, PubMed (non-MEDLINE content)) for published studies as well as sources for grey literature to detect unpublished studies. Two authors will independently screen abstracts and full texts using pre-defined eligibility criteria, select studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias of included studies or reviews. In general, we will conduct a systematic narrative synthesis. Criteria for conducting meta-analyses were defined a priori. Our primary outcomes of interest are tooth loss, loosening of teeth, and depletion of bone tissue. Secondary outcomes are gingivitis/gum inflammation, pocket depths, dental hygiene, lifestyle modifications (e.g., smoking, alcohol, nutrition), and toothache. We consulted a panel of experts and patient representatives to prioritize these outcomes. Two investigators will assess independently the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
DISCUSSION
We anticipate that our review will highlight the gaps in the available evidence about the effectiveness of screening for periodontal diseases during periodic health examinations. Implications for screening programs may be based on linked evidence about the validity of available screening tools and the effectiveness of early treatment.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42017081150.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30803450
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0977-9
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-0977-9
pmc: PMC6388477
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6:CD005297
pubmed: 28605006
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400
pubmed: 21194891
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):9-18
pubmed: 7853053
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
pubmed: 7786990
Dent Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;49(3):677-94, viii
pubmed: 15978247
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8 Suppl):1560-8
pubmed: 18673011
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490
pubmed: 15205295
Periodontol 2000. 2004;34:9-21
pubmed: 14717852
Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;6(1):231
pubmed: 29162130
J Dent Res. 2014 Nov;93(11):1045-53
pubmed: 25261053
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;(8):CD009197
pubmed: 25123257
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6
pubmed: 27005575
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008
pubmed: 28935701
Int Dent J. 1987 Dec;37(4):222-33
pubmed: 3481626
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Jun 02;16(1):64
pubmed: 27388493
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Apr;43(4):333-44
pubmed: 26810308
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34
pubmed: 26092286
J Periodontol. 2005 Nov;76(11):1910-8
pubmed: 16274310
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 17;(4):CD004622
pubmed: 25884249
Diabetologia. 2012 Jan;55(1):21-31
pubmed: 22057194
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10
pubmed: 18483053
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Lancet. 2005 Nov 19;366(9499):1809-20
pubmed: 16298220
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;16(3):716-28
pubmed: 24896284
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 12;7(1):159
pubmed: 30314530
Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 06;5:4
pubmed: 26739283
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S77-91
pubmed: 25597787
J Periodontal Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):294-314
pubmed: 25142259
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 13;7(1):85
pubmed: 29898777
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):289-300
pubmed: 17310053
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 18;6(1):145
pubmed: 28720141
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1050-1058
pubmed: 27513809
J Dent Res. 2005 Oct;84(10):881-90
pubmed: 16183785
J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32 Suppl 6:132-58
pubmed: 16128835
Periodontol 2000. 1995 Feb;7:39-53
pubmed: 9567929
Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 8;6(1):185
pubmed: 28886726
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):39
pubmed: 29490699
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD009009
pubmed: 23076952
Int Dent J. 2012 Apr;62(2):57-64
pubmed: 22420472
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120