Creation and Validation of Linkage Between Orthopedic Registry and Administrative Data Using Indirect Identifiers.
Algorithms
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ statistics & numerical data
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ statistics & numerical data
Data Accuracy
Data Collection
/ methods
Databases, Factual
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Male
New York
Orthopedics
/ standards
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Registries
Reproducibility of Results
Residence Characteristics
data linkage
device evaluation
joint arthroplasty
orthopedic device registry
validation
Journal
The Journal of arthroplasty
ISSN: 1532-8406
Titre abrégé: J Arthroplasty
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8703515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
03
12
2018
revised:
07
01
2019
accepted:
23
01
2019
pubmed:
26
2
2019
medline:
23
4
2020
entrez:
27
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Registries and administrative databases have unique and complementary strengths in device epidemiologic studies. We sought to develop, validate, and assess a sequential algorithm using indirect identifiers to link registry and administrative data. Hip and knee arthroplasty procedures performed at 6 New York State hospitals enrolled in American Joint Replacement Registry in 2014 were included. After conducting a direct linkage using patient identifiers including name and social security numbers, we validated the methodology of indirect linkage using facility ID, patients' year and month of birth, sex, and zip code, and procedure date and site (hip/knee). We further evaluated the influence of absent indirect identifier(s) and compromised data quality on linkage success. Using our sequential algorithm, 3739 of the 4063 directly linked records (92.03%) were matched with indirect identifiers, with an accuracy of >99.9%. Main reasons for nonmatching included discrepancies in procedure codes and dates. When one of the indirect identifiers was not available, the linkage algorithm still achieved over 90% sensitivity and 99.8% accuracy. Analyses showed that the algorithm was robust when quality of data was moderately compromised. This study demonstrated high sensitivity and accuracy of an algorithm to create linkages between a registry and an administrative database using indirect identifiers. The methodology will enable long-term surveillance and outcome assessment of a wide variety of devices and procedures. Variations in the coding of procedures, availability of indirect identifiers, and their quality have limited impact on this algorithm.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Registries and administrative databases have unique and complementary strengths in device epidemiologic studies. We sought to develop, validate, and assess a sequential algorithm using indirect identifiers to link registry and administrative data.
METHODS
Hip and knee arthroplasty procedures performed at 6 New York State hospitals enrolled in American Joint Replacement Registry in 2014 were included. After conducting a direct linkage using patient identifiers including name and social security numbers, we validated the methodology of indirect linkage using facility ID, patients' year and month of birth, sex, and zip code, and procedure date and site (hip/knee). We further evaluated the influence of absent indirect identifier(s) and compromised data quality on linkage success.
RESULTS
Using our sequential algorithm, 3739 of the 4063 directly linked records (92.03%) were matched with indirect identifiers, with an accuracy of >99.9%. Main reasons for nonmatching included discrepancies in procedure codes and dates. When one of the indirect identifiers was not available, the linkage algorithm still achieved over 90% sensitivity and 99.8% accuracy. Analyses showed that the algorithm was robust when quality of data was moderately compromised.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated high sensitivity and accuracy of an algorithm to create linkages between a registry and an administrative database using indirect identifiers. The methodology will enable long-term surveillance and outcome assessment of a wide variety of devices and procedures. Variations in the coding of procedures, availability of indirect identifiers, and their quality have limited impact on this algorithm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30803801
pii: S0883-5403(19)30108-1
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.063
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1076-1081.e0Subventions
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD005478
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.