Fluoroquinolone Efficacy against Tuberculosis Is Driven by Penetration into Lesions and Activity against Resident Bacterial Populations.
MDR-TB
fluoroquinolone
lesion-centric pharmacology
moxifloxacin
tuberculosis
Journal
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
ISSN: 1098-6596
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Agents Chemother
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0315061
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2018
accepted:
17
02
2019
pubmed:
26
2
2019
medline:
31
3
2020
entrez:
27
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fluoroquinolones represent the pillar of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment, with moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, or gatifloxacin being prescribed to MDR-TB patients. Recently, several clinical trials of "universal" drug regimens, aiming to treat drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB, have included a fluoroquinolone. In the absence of clinical data comparing their side-by-side efficacies in controlled MDR-TB trials, a pharmacological rationale is needed to guide the selection of the most efficacious fluoroquinolone. The present studies were designed to test the hypothesis that fluoroquinolone concentrations (pharmacokinetics) and activity (pharmacodynamics) at the site of infection are better predictors of efficacy than the plasma concentrations and potency measured in standard growth inhibition assays and are better suited to determinations of whether one of the fluoroquinolones outperforms the others in rabbits with active TB. We first measured the penetration of these fluoroquinolones in lung lesion compartments, and their potency against bacterial populations that reside in each compartment, to compute lesion-centric pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters. PK modeling methods were used to quantify drug penetration from plasma to tissues at human-equivalent doses. On the basis of these metrics, moxifloxacin emerged with a clear advantage, whereas plasma-based PK/PD favored levofloxacin (the ranges of the plasma AUC/MIC ratio [i.e., the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC] are 46 to 86 for moxifloxacin and 74 to 258 for levofloxacin). A comparative efficacy trial in the rabbit model of active TB demonstrated the superiority of moxifloxacin in reducing bacterial burden at the lesion level and in sterilizing cellular and necrotic lesions. Collectively, these results show that PK/PD data obtained at the site of infection represent an adequate predictor of drug efficacy against TB and constitute the baseline required to explore synergies, antagonism, and drug-drug interactions in fluoroquinolone-containing regimens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30803965
pii: AAC.02516-18
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02516-18
pmc: PMC6496041
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antitubercular Agents
0
Fluoroquinolones
0
Levofloxacin
6GNT3Y5LMF
Moxifloxacin
U188XYD42P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD018072
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI123093
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI111967
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL131072
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD023524
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Sarathy et al.
Références
J Theor Biol. 2015 Feb 21;367:166-179
pubmed: 25497475
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016 Feb 24;5:e12
pubmed: 26905025
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov 16;60(2):735-43
pubmed: 26574016
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Apr;48(4):1281-8
pubmed: 15047530
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jan;56(1):446-57
pubmed: 21986820
J Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 1;190(9):1642-51
pubmed: 15478070
Infect Immun. 2005 Jan;73(1):546-51
pubmed: 15618194
Clin Ther. 2000 Jul;22(7):798-817; discussion 797
pubmed: 10945507
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Oct;26(10):879-91
pubmed: 17901792
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):
pubmed: 28696241
Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jan;5(1):
pubmed: 28233509
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Dec 1;20(12):42-47
pubmed: 28240572
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Jun;10(6):605-12
pubmed: 16776446
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jun;56(6):3054-7
pubmed: 22470118
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 15;8(7):e68680
pubmed: 23869227
Risk Anal. 2002 Jun;22(3):591-622
pubmed: 12088236
Sci Adv. 2017 Oct 11;3(10):e1701881
pubmed: 29026882
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):
pubmed: 29203492
Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):986-93
pubmed: 22828481
ACS Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 12;2(8):552-63
pubmed: 27626295
Curr Top Med Chem. 2003;3(3):249-82
pubmed: 12570763
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Feb;51(2):576-82
pubmed: 17145798
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1599-608
pubmed: 25337749
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Aug 1;72(8):2326-2333
pubmed: 28535203
J Immunol. 2011 Mar 15;186(6):3472-83
pubmed: 21321109
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;23(4):243-55
pubmed: 15024625
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jul 25;61(8):
pubmed: 28507117
Nat Med. 2014 Jan;20(1):75-9
pubmed: 24336248
mBio. 2010 Aug 10;1(3):
pubmed: 20802826
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Aug;56(8):4471-3
pubmed: 22585223
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Mar;13(3):364-70
pubmed: 26871879
BMC Syst Biol. 2015 Nov 14;9:79
pubmed: 26578235
Elife. 2018 Nov 14;7:
pubmed: 30427309
Chest. 2010 Jan;137(1):122-8
pubmed: 19749004
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;57(11):1369-1386
pubmed: 28741299
Lancet. 2015 May 2;385(9979):1738-1747
pubmed: 25795076
PLoS One. 2016 May 09;11(5):e0154778
pubmed: 27159505
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1588-98
pubmed: 25337748
Infect Immun. 1996 Jun;64(6):2062-9
pubmed: 8675308
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):821-834
pubmed: 30215381
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1441-1449
pubmed: 28175315
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep;55(9):4492-3; author reply 4493
pubmed: 21849570
J Theor Biol. 2008 Sep 7;254(1):178-96
pubmed: 18572196
J Vis Exp. 2018 Apr 18;(134):
pubmed: 29733325
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1577-87
pubmed: 25196020
Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Sep;37(9):1287-98
pubmed: 12921513
Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Oct;37(10):1478-88
pubmed: 14519053
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Jul;42(1):36-41
pubmed: 23582696
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Mar;52(3):852-7
pubmed: 18070980
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 16;113(7):1706-13
pubmed: 26792525
Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Sep;10(9):621-9
pubmed: 20797644
PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001300
pubmed: 22952439
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006 Jun;4(3):479-90
pubmed: 16771624
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Aug;42(8):2066-9
pubmed: 9687408
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 15;59(10):1364-74
pubmed: 25097082
Open Biol. 2011 Dec;1(4):110016
pubmed: 22645653
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Jun;39(6):1341-4
pubmed: 7574527
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Jul;59(7):3800-7
pubmed: 25870068
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Mar;70(3):857-67
pubmed: 25587994
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Aug 26;144(3-4):437-43
pubmed: 20227841
Nat Med. 2015 Oct;21(10):1223-7
pubmed: 26343800
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Jan;6(1):41-52
pubmed: 18079742
J Exp Med. 2018 Aug 6;215(8):1975-1986
pubmed: 30018074
J Theor Biol. 2004 Dec 7;231(3):357-76
pubmed: 15501468
PLoS Pathog. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000204
pubmed: 19002241
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15;45(8):1001-7
pubmed: 17879915
Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Mar;25(139):19-28
pubmed: 26929417
Eur Respir J. 2014 Jul;44(1):23-63
pubmed: 24659544
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct 1;188(7):858-64
pubmed: 23927582
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Aug 17;13(8):e1005650
pubmed: 28817561
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Sep;57(9):4164-71
pubmed: 23774436
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):4026-34
pubmed: 24798275
Eur Respir J. 2013 Jul;42(1):156-68
pubmed: 23100499