Updated results on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the papillary muscles of the left ventricle.

catheter ablation intracardiac echocardiography intracardiac ultrasound ventricular arrhythmia ventricular tachycardia

Journal

Journal of arrhythmia
ISSN: 1880-4276
Titre abrégé: J Arrhythm
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101263026

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 31 07 2018
revised: 19 09 2018
accepted: 09 10 2018
entrez: 27 2 2019
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 26 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from the left ventricle`s (LV) papillary muscles (PM) is challenging. In this study we present results of catheter ablation using multiple energy sources and image-based approaches. Fifty-three patients (49 ± 17 years old; 34% females; median LV ejection fraction 53 ± 11%) underwent catheter cryoablation or radiofrequency (RF) ablation with non-contact force sensing (Non-CFS) catheters and cardiac computed tomography integration (CTII) into the electroanatomical mapping system or contact force sensing RF (CFS RF) ablation catheters and intracardiac echo-facilitated 3D electroanatomical mapping. Ventricular arrhythmias foci were mapped at either the anterolateral (ALPM) or posteromedial papillary muscles (PMPM). Ablation was performed using an 8-mm cryoablation catheter (CRYO); a Non-CFS 4-mm open-irrigated RF catheter; or a CFS RF 3.5-mm open-irrigated tip catheter, via transmitral or transaortic approach. Acute success rate was 83% for Non-CFS RF/CTII; 100% for CRYO/CTII (n = 16) and CFS RF/ICE3D (n = 14) ( Non-CFS/CTII was associated with an increased risk of recurrence of the clinical arrhythmia. Ablation with either CFS RF/ICE3D or CRYO/CTII showed high acute success rates and low recurrence rates during follow-up. Cryoablation provided stable contact and was less arrhythmogenic.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from the left ventricle`s (LV) papillary muscles (PM) is challenging. In this study we present results of catheter ablation using multiple energy sources and image-based approaches.
METHODS METHODS
Fifty-three patients (49 ± 17 years old; 34% females; median LV ejection fraction 53 ± 11%) underwent catheter cryoablation or radiofrequency (RF) ablation with non-contact force sensing (Non-CFS) catheters and cardiac computed tomography integration (CTII) into the electroanatomical mapping system or contact force sensing RF (CFS RF) ablation catheters and intracardiac echo-facilitated 3D electroanatomical mapping. Ventricular arrhythmias foci were mapped at either the anterolateral (ALPM) or posteromedial papillary muscles (PMPM). Ablation was performed using an 8-mm cryoablation catheter (CRYO); a Non-CFS 4-mm open-irrigated RF catheter; or a CFS RF 3.5-mm open-irrigated tip catheter, via transmitral or transaortic approach.
RESULTS RESULTS
Acute success rate was 83% for Non-CFS RF/CTII; 100% for CRYO/CTII (n = 16) and CFS RF/ICE3D (n = 14) (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Non-CFS/CTII was associated with an increased risk of recurrence of the clinical arrhythmia. Ablation with either CFS RF/ICE3D or CRYO/CTII showed high acute success rates and low recurrence rates during follow-up. Cryoablation provided stable contact and was less arrhythmogenic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30805050
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12137
pii: JOA312137
pmc: PMC6373649
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

99-108

Références

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;1(6):509-516
pubmed: 29759404
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003874
pubmed: 27069089
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2016 Sep;8(3):555-65
pubmed: 27521089
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:876-82
pubmed: 27400187
Europace. 2009 Jun;11(6):771-817
pubmed: 19443434
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;10(3):
pubmed: 28292752
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Apr;11(4):566-73
pubmed: 24398086
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1158-64
pubmed: 24946987
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Nov;5(11):1530-7
pubmed: 18984528
Europace. 2017 Jan;19(1):21-28
pubmed: 27485578
J Arrhythm. 2018 Nov 18;35(1):99-108
pubmed: 30805050
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;8(3):616-24
pubmed: 25925230
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Aug;3(4):324-31
pubmed: 20558848
Europace. 2009 Oct;11(10):1403-5
pubmed: 19797152
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun;12(6):1137-44
pubmed: 25728755
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Nov;14(11):1721-1728
pubmed: 28668624
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 May;9(5):
pubmed: 27103091
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008 Apr;1(1):23-9
pubmed: 19808390
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 6;51(18):1794-802
pubmed: 18452787

Auteurs

Santiago Rivera (S)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Leandro Tomas (L)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Maria de la Paz Ricapito (MP)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Vecchio Nicolas (V)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Marcelo Reinoso (M)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Milagros Caro (M)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Ignacio Mondragon (I)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Gaston Albina (G)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Alberto Giniger (A)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Fernando Scazzuso (F)

Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos Aires (ICBA) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina.

Classifications MeSH