Implementation and evaluation of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination pilot for men who have sex with men (MSM), England, April 2016 to March 2017.


Journal

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
ISSN: 1560-7917
Titre abrégé: Euro Surveill
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 100887452

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
entrez: 28 2 2019
pubmed: 28 2 2019
medline: 17 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Opportunistic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for men who have sex with men (MSM) was piloted in sexual health clinics (SHC) in England between 2016 and 2018. to evaluate the pilot's first year (April 2016-March 2017) in terms of feasibility, acceptability, uptake, impact and equity and interpret the outcome in the context of wide HPV vaccination policy. Attendance and uptake data from routine SHC surveillance datasets and a cross-sectional survey administered to individuals receiving the vaccine were analysed. Among 18,875 eligible MSM, 8,580 (45.5%) were recorded as having received one HPV vaccine dose, decreasing slightly with increasing age, and uptake was higher in rural than urban areas. Survey results suggested that of those receiving the first dose of HPV vaccine, 8% were new attendees and that among those, less than 11% attended just to receive the vaccine. Of those having their first HPV vaccination, 95% indicated they would like to receive the next vaccine doses at the same clinic and 85% of patients reported accessing other services when visiting SHC for the first dose of vaccine. An opportunistic HPV vaccination programme for MSM can be delivered in an acceptable and, as far as can be evaluated, equitable manner, without major disruption to SHC and HIV clinics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Opportunistic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for men who have sex with men (MSM) was piloted in sexual health clinics (SHC) in England between 2016 and 2018.
AIM OBJECTIVE
to evaluate the pilot's first year (April 2016-March 2017) in terms of feasibility, acceptability, uptake, impact and equity and interpret the outcome in the context of wide HPV vaccination policy.
METHODS METHODS
Attendance and uptake data from routine SHC surveillance datasets and a cross-sectional survey administered to individuals receiving the vaccine were analysed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 18,875 eligible MSM, 8,580 (45.5%) were recorded as having received one HPV vaccine dose, decreasing slightly with increasing age, and uptake was higher in rural than urban areas. Survey results suggested that of those receiving the first dose of HPV vaccine, 8% were new attendees and that among those, less than 11% attended just to receive the vaccine. Of those having their first HPV vaccination, 95% indicated they would like to receive the next vaccine doses at the same clinic and 85% of patients reported accessing other services when visiting SHC for the first dose of vaccine.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
An opportunistic HPV vaccination programme for MSM can be delivered in an acceptable and, as far as can be evaluated, equitable manner, without major disruption to SHC and HIV clinics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30808443
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.8.1800055
pmc: PMC6446955
doi:

Substances chimiques

Papillomavirus Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

J Pathol. 1999 Sep;189(1):12-9
pubmed: 10451482
Cancer. 2004 Jul 15;101(2):270-80
pubmed: 15241823
Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/11-25
pubmed: 16949997
Br J Cancer. 2007 May 7;96(9):1320-3
pubmed: 17375045
Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008 Jan;5(1):24-31
pubmed: 18097454
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):733-44
pubmed: 18767894
BMJ. 2013 Apr 18;346:f2032
pubmed: 23599298
Virol J. 2013 May 01;10:137
pubmed: 23634957
J Clin Pathol. 2015 Feb;68(2):135-40
pubmed: 25410654
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):565-80
pubmed: 25744474
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;64(5):580-588
pubmed: 28011615
Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Nov;94(7):542-544
pubmed: 28280237
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):913-914
pubmed: 30238882

Auteurs

Michael Edelstein (M)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Nalini Iyanger (N)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Nicola Hennessy (N)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

David Mesher (D)

Blood Safety, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) and HIV service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Marta Checchi (M)

Blood Safety, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) and HIV service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Kate Soldan (K)

Blood Safety, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) and HIV service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Mark McCall (M)

Blood Safety, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) and HIV service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Julie Nugent (J)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Jonathan Crofts (J)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Janice Lo (J)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Richard Gilson (R)

Mortimer Market Sexual Health Clinic, London, United Kingdom.

Karen Powell (K)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Mary Ramsay (M)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Joanne Yarwood (J)

Immunisation and countermeasures division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH