Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity.

agronomic practices drainage genetic solutions soil engineering waterlogging tolerance

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 28 10 2018
accepted: 28 01 2019
entrez: 28 2 2019
pubmed: 28 2 2019
medline: 28 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Waterlogging remains a significant constraint to cereal production across the globe in areas with high rainfall and/or poor drainage. Improving tolerance of plants to waterlogging is the most economical way of tackling the problem. However, under severe waterlogging combined agronomic, engineering and genetic solutions will be more effective. A wide range of agronomic and engineering solutions are currently being used by grain growers to reduce losses from waterlogging. In this scoping study, we reviewed the effects of waterlogging on plant growth, and advantages and disadvantages of various agronomic and engineering solutions which are used to mitigate waterlogging damage. Further research should be focused on: cost/benefit analyses of different drainage strategies; understanding the mechanisms of nutrient loss during waterlogging and quantifying the benefits of nutrient application; increasing soil profile de-watering through soil improvement and agronomic strategies; revealing specificity of the interaction between different management practices and environment as well as among management practices; and more importantly, combined genetic, agronomic and engineering strategies for varying environments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30809241
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00140
pmc: PMC6379354
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

140

Références

J Plant Physiol. 2018 Aug;227:45-55
pubmed: 29735176
Environ Int. 2005 Oct;31(8):1167-81
pubmed: 15922449
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 20;9:1863
pubmed: 30619425
Ann Bot. 2005 Sep;96(4):501-5
pubmed: 16217870
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2015 Jan;17(1):26-33
pubmed: 24985051
Plant Cell Rep. 2018 Nov;37(11):1547-1555
pubmed: 30056500
Plant Physiol. 2007 Sep;145(1):266-76
pubmed: 17660351
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002 Apr;59(4):708-14
pubmed: 12022476
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:313-39
pubmed: 18444902
Plant Direct. 2018 Apr 25;2(4):e00056
pubmed: 31245721
New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(2):289-98
pubmed: 21563365
J Environ Qual. 2010 Feb 19;39(2):630-41
pubmed: 20176836
Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Aug;5(8):1006-9
pubmed: 20724824
Physiol Plant. 2013 Apr;147(4):514-23
pubmed: 22924708
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Jun;6(3):247-56
pubmed: 12753974
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jul 18;69(16):4065-4082
pubmed: 29788353
Obes Rev. 2008 Mar;9 Suppl 1:6-13
pubmed: 18307693
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 Jan;21(1):53-60
pubmed: 20387423
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 May;41(5):908-918
pubmed: 28107563
J Biol Chem. 2012 Jul 27;287(31):26094-103
pubmed: 22692214
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jan 22;11(1):60
pubmed: 29357942
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jan 23;69(3):667-680
pubmed: 29301054
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Mar;43(2):87-104
pubmed: 32480444
Ann Bot. 2003 Mar;91(4):447-53
pubmed: 12588724
Funct Plant Biol. 2018 Feb;45(3):340-349
pubmed: 32290957
Tree Physiol. 2006 Jun;26(6):759-66
pubmed: 16510391
AoB Plants. 2015 Jul 20;7:
pubmed: 26194168
Funct Plant Biol. 2004 Mar;31(2):121-129
pubmed: 32688884
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 1;619-620:977-987
pubmed: 29734643
Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):671-7
pubmed: 12167873
Water Res. 2018 Oct 1;142:196-207
pubmed: 29883893
Environ Manage. 2011 Sep;48(3):448-61
pubmed: 21667317
Ann Bot. 2006 Jul;98(1):9-32
pubmed: 16644893
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(1):39-57
pubmed: 20847100
J Environ Qual. 2011 May-Jun;40(3):791-9
pubmed: 21546664
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Jan;29(1):149-157
pubmed: 29692023
Crop Sci. 1998 Nov-Dec;38(6):1576-84
pubmed: 11541446
Front Physiol. 2017 Sep 25;8:632
pubmed: 28993735
J Plant Physiol. 2011 Sep 1;168(13):1562-7
pubmed: 21377755
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(5):1017-23
pubmed: 16510516
Physiol Plant. 2018 Dec;164(4):452-466
pubmed: 30054915
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Jun;29(6):1107-21
pubmed: 17080937
New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(2):269-73
pubmed: 21443603
Funct Plant Biol. 2007 Apr;34(3):221-227
pubmed: 32689348
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 May;39(5):1068-86
pubmed: 26565998
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Aug;130(8):1559-1568
pubmed: 28447117
J Plant Growth Regul. 1999 Aug;18(1):9-14
pubmed: 10467014
Physiol Plant. 2008 Jul;133(3):481-9
pubmed: 18346071
BMC Genomics. 2008 Aug 27;9:401
pubmed: 18752688
J Plant Physiol. 2006 May;163(7):750-60
pubmed: 16616586
Ann Bot. 2003 Jan;91 Spec No:179-94
pubmed: 12509339
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Feb 18;6:69
pubmed: 25741354
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Apr;21(4):329-340
pubmed: 26704665

Auteurs

S M Nuruzzaman Manik (SMN)

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.

Georgina Pengilley (G)

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.

Geoffrey Dean (G)

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.

Brian Field (B)

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.

Sergey Shabala (S)

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.

Meixue Zhou (M)

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.
Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry/School of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.

Classifications MeSH