Length of stay following cesarean sections: A population based study in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
03
10
2018
accepted:
01
01
2019
entrez:
28
2
2019
pubmed:
28
2
2019
medline:
30
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Births by cesarean section (CS) usually require longer recovery time, and as a result women remain hospitalized longer following CS than vaginal delivery (VD). A number of strategies have been proposed to reduce avoidable health care costs associated with childbirth. Among these, the containment of length of hospital stay (LoS) has been identified as an important quality indicator of obstetric care and performance efficiency of maternity centres. Since improvement of obstetric care at hospital level needs quantitative evidence, we compared the maternity services of an Italian region on LoS post CS. We conducted a population-based study in Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG), a region of North-Eastern Italy, collecting data from all its 12 maternity centres (coded from A to K) during 2005-2015. We fitted a multivariable logistic regression using LoS as a binary outcome, higher/lower than the international early discharge (ED) cutoffs for CS (4 days), controlling for hospitals as well as several factors related to the clinical conditions of the mothers and the newborn, the obstetric history and socio-demographic background. Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Population attributable risks (PARs) were also calculated as proportional variation of LoS>ED for each hospital in the ideal scenario of having the same performance as centre J (the reference) during calendar year 2015. Results were expressed as PAR with 95%CI. Differences in mean LoS were also investigated with a multivariable linear regression model including the same explanatory factors of the above multiple logistic regression. Results were expressed as adjusted regression coefficients (aRC) with 95%CI. Although decreasing over the years (5.0 ± 1.7 days in 2005 vs. 4.4 ± 1.7 days in 2015), the pooled mean LoS in the whole FVG during these 11 years was still 4.7 ± 1.7 days, higher than respective international ED benchmark. The significant decreasing trend of LoS>ED over time in FVG (aOR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.88; 0.90) was marginal as compared to the variability of LoS>ED observed among the various maternity services. Regardless it was expressed as aRC or aOR, LoS after CS was lowest in hospital C, highest in hospital D and intermediate in centres I, K, G, F, A, H, E, B and J (in descending order). The aOR of LoS being longer than ED ranged from 1.63 (95%CI:1.46; 1.81) in hospital B up to 32.09 (95%CI: 25.68; 40.10) in facility D. When hospitals were ranked by PAR the same pattern was found, even if restricting the analysis to low risk pregnancies. Although significantly decreasing over time, the mean LoS in FVG during 2005-2015 was 4.7 days, higher than the international threshold recommended for CS. There was substantial variability in LoS by facility centre, suggesting that internal organizational processes of single hospitals should be improved by enforcing standardized guidelines and using audits, economic incentives and penalties if need be.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Births by cesarean section (CS) usually require longer recovery time, and as a result women remain hospitalized longer following CS than vaginal delivery (VD). A number of strategies have been proposed to reduce avoidable health care costs associated with childbirth. Among these, the containment of length of hospital stay (LoS) has been identified as an important quality indicator of obstetric care and performance efficiency of maternity centres. Since improvement of obstetric care at hospital level needs quantitative evidence, we compared the maternity services of an Italian region on LoS post CS.
METHODS
We conducted a population-based study in Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG), a region of North-Eastern Italy, collecting data from all its 12 maternity centres (coded from A to K) during 2005-2015. We fitted a multivariable logistic regression using LoS as a binary outcome, higher/lower than the international early discharge (ED) cutoffs for CS (4 days), controlling for hospitals as well as several factors related to the clinical conditions of the mothers and the newborn, the obstetric history and socio-demographic background. Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Population attributable risks (PARs) were also calculated as proportional variation of LoS>ED for each hospital in the ideal scenario of having the same performance as centre J (the reference) during calendar year 2015. Results were expressed as PAR with 95%CI. Differences in mean LoS were also investigated with a multivariable linear regression model including the same explanatory factors of the above multiple logistic regression. Results were expressed as adjusted regression coefficients (aRC) with 95%CI.
RESULTS
Although decreasing over the years (5.0 ± 1.7 days in 2005 vs. 4.4 ± 1.7 days in 2015), the pooled mean LoS in the whole FVG during these 11 years was still 4.7 ± 1.7 days, higher than respective international ED benchmark. The significant decreasing trend of LoS>ED over time in FVG (aOR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.88; 0.90) was marginal as compared to the variability of LoS>ED observed among the various maternity services. Regardless it was expressed as aRC or aOR, LoS after CS was lowest in hospital C, highest in hospital D and intermediate in centres I, K, G, F, A, H, E, B and J (in descending order). The aOR of LoS being longer than ED ranged from 1.63 (95%CI:1.46; 1.81) in hospital B up to 32.09 (95%CI: 25.68; 40.10) in facility D. When hospitals were ranked by PAR the same pattern was found, even if restricting the analysis to low risk pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS
Although significantly decreasing over time, the mean LoS in FVG during 2005-2015 was 4.7 days, higher than the international threshold recommended for CS. There was substantial variability in LoS by facility centre, suggesting that internal organizational processes of single hospitals should be improved by enforcing standardized guidelines and using audits, economic incentives and penalties if need be.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30811413
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210753
pii: PONE-D-18-28634
pmc: PMC6392330
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0210753Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Oct;36(5):430-4
pubmed: 23025363
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 26;13:78
pubmed: 23530472
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005 Sep;53(4):373-82
pubmed: 16353512
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Mar 26;129(7):618-22
pubmed: 19337329
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2005 Oct 14;5:13
pubmed: 16225678
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):267-271
pubmed: 29733840
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Mar;101(3):523-9
pubmed: 25733637
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):669-77
pubmed: 17329519
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Jan 1;90(1):30-9, 39A
pubmed: 22271962
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4840-52
pubmed: 27246783
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Feb;29(1):E34-42
pubmed: 24525748
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188612
pubmed: 29190768
CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):455-60
pubmed: 17296957
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):63-72
pubmed: 16818550
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):66
pubmed: 29523121
J Health Econ. 1999 Aug;18(4):473-90
pubmed: 10539618
Vital Health Stat 13. 2010 Dec;(168):1-79
pubmed: 25268152
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 03;9(6):e97769
pubmed: 24892928
Health Econ. 2002 Apr;11(3):193-206
pubmed: 11921317
PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 08;13(3):e1001972
pubmed: 26954561
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):e0204919
pubmed: 30605470
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0164126
pubmed: 27716779
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;40(2):149-56
pubmed: 21314716
JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):348-54
pubmed: 24522747
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Jul;32(9):825-32
pubmed: 25594218
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Nov;84(5):832-8
pubmed: 7936522
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 10;9(4):e94532
pubmed: 24722411
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 14;6(9):e012007
pubmed: 27630070
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Oct 1;91(10):746-756A
pubmed: 24115798
Laeknabladid. 2011 Jul;97(7-8):407-12
pubmed: 21849712
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):926-31
pubmed: 20859157
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113
pubmed: 17302638
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5685261
pubmed: 27995142
An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Oct;71(4):349-61
pubmed: 19766069
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Dec;11(6):561-76
pubmed: 24155076
Health Policy. 2002 Sep;61(3):269-78
pubmed: 12098520
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Sep;51(3):353-61
pubmed: 20601901
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 4;8(4):e020520
pubmed: 29622577
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2349-58
pubmed: 17142518
BMJ. 2011 Jan 25;342:d276
pubmed: 21266421
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):860-5
pubmed: 9351780
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Sep 06;11:62
pubmed: 21892967
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Apr;45(4):202-209
pubmed: 28373040
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1444-53
pubmed: 18385496
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 09;14:135
pubmed: 24716672
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):91
pubmed: 28320342
BMJ. 2008 Oct 17;337:a1702
pubmed: 18930971