Stochastic Counterfactual Risk Analysis for the Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber-Physical Attacks on Electricity Distribution Infrastructure Networks.
Critical National Infrastructure
cyber-physical attack
infrastructure
Journal
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
ISSN: 1539-6924
Titre abrégé: Risk Anal
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
11
11
2017
revised:
07
01
2019
accepted:
05
02
2019
pubmed:
28
2
2019
medline:
28
2
2019
entrez:
28
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In December 2015, a cyber-physical attack took place on the Ukrainian electricity distribution network. This is regarded as one of the first cyber-physical attacks on electricity infrastructure to have led to a substantial power outage and is illustrative of the increasing vulnerability of Critical National Infrastructure to this type of malicious activity. Few data points, coupled with the rapid emergence of cyber phenomena, has held back the development of resilience analytics of cyber-physical attacks, relative to many other threats. We propose to overcome data limitations by applying stochastic counterfactual risk analysis as part of a new vulnerability assessment framework. The method is developed in the context of the direct and indirect socioeconomic impacts of a Ukrainian-style cyber-physical attack taking place on the electricity distribution network serving London and its surrounding regions. A key finding is that if decision-makers wish to mitigate major population disruptions, then they must invest resources more-or-less equally across all substations, to prevent the scaling of a cyber-physical attack. However, there are some substations associated with higher economic value due to their support of other Critical National Infrastructures assets, which justifies the allocation of additional cyber security investment to reduce the chance of cascading failure. Further cyber-physical vulnerability research must address the tradeoffs inherent in a system made up of multiple institutions with different strategic risk mitigation objectives and metrics of value, such as governments, infrastructure operators, and commercial consumers of infrastructure services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30812052
doi: 10.1111/risa.13291
pmc: PMC6850035
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2012-2031Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis.
Références
Risk Anal. 2018 Apr;38(4):804-825
pubmed: 28833319
Risk Anal. 2018 Jan;38(1):151-162
pubmed: 28437870
Risk Anal. 2018 Jan;38(1):134-150
pubmed: 28666064
Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):133-48
pubmed: 9000895
Risk Anal. 2007 Jun;27(3):513-31
pubmed: 17640205
Risk Anal. 2017 Sep 5;:null
pubmed: 28873246
Risk Anal. 2016 Apr;36(4):694-710
pubmed: 25847370
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1:S39-50
pubmed: 22882891
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1:S51-68
pubmed: 22882892
Risk Anal. 2007 Oct;27(5):1283-97
pubmed: 18076496
Risk Anal. 2018 Feb;38(2):226-241
pubmed: 28679022
Risk Anal. 2017 Sep;37(9):1644-1651
pubmed: 27935146
Risk Anal. 2017 Dec;37(12):2490-2505
pubmed: 28605055
Risk Anal. 2017 Aug;37(8):1606-1627
pubmed: 28800378
Risk Anal. 2019 May;39(5):1022-1043
pubmed: 30408211