Direct health-care cost of head and neck cancers: a population-based study in north-eastern Italy.
Diagnostic cost
Economic burden
Head and neck cancer
Population-based study
Treatment cost
Journal
Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England)
ISSN: 1559-131X
Titre abrégé: Med Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9435512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Feb 2019
28 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
05
12
2018
accepted:
12
02
2019
entrez:
1
3
2019
pubmed:
1
3
2019
medline:
8
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improvements in prognosis of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have paralleled with an increase in health-care costs, so that an economic evaluation is of growing importance. Presently, most of the evidence is from insurance-based studies in the USA. Between 2007 and 2010, 879 HNSCC patients were identified through the population-based cancer registry of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, including 266 oral, 187 oropharyngeal, 136 hypopharyngeal, and 290 laryngeal cancers. Health-care costs from diagnosis to treatment initiation and in the following 2 years were retrieved through a record linkage with the regional health data warehouse. This database collected comprehensive health information on all resident citizens. Generalized linear models with a gamma distribution and log-link function were applied to model costs. The average health-care cost from diagnosis up to 2 years after treatment initiation was €20,184 (95% confidence interval: €19,634 - 20,733). Heterogeneity emerged according to cancer site, elective treatment, and retreatment for cancer persistence/recurrence (no: €13,896; yes: €24,599; p < 0.001). An advanced stage was associated with increased costs stage (I: €12,969; II: €18,276; III: €26,229; IV: €25,574; p < 0.001) as the result of treatment complexity and elevated frequency of patients retreatment due to recurrence. These findings further support strategies to diagnose patients at an earlier cancer stage and the accurate definition of diagnostic and treatment pathways, to start treating patients when radical unimodal approach is still feasible. Besides the advantage in prognosis due to timely curative treatments, this would reduce the economic burden of cancer treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30815763
doi: 10.1007/s12032-019-1256-2
pii: 10.1007/s12032-019-1256-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31Références
Eur J Cancer. 2001 Nov;37(17):2204-11
pubmed: 11677108
BMC Public Health. 2002 Jul 19;2:12
pubmed: 12133170
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov;130(11):1269-75
pubmed: 15545580
Head Neck. 2008 Feb;30(2):178-86
pubmed: 17694558
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S33-6
pubmed: 19536013
BMC Public Health. 2010 Apr 16;10:196
pubmed: 20398380
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v184-6
pubmed: 20555077
Health Econ. 2011 Aug;20(8):897-916
pubmed: 20799344
Epidemiol Prev. 2010 Jul-Aug;34(4):167-76
pubmed: 21224518
Head Neck Oncol. 2011 Oct 28;3:47
pubmed: 22035422
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):865-82
pubmed: 24842794
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 02;16:569
pubmed: 27480165
Oral Oncol. 2016 Oct;61:83-8
pubmed: 27688109
Am J Otolaryngol. 2016 Nov - Dec;37(6):479-483
pubmed: 27968955
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Dec;121(3):468-474
pubmed: 28007378
Oral Oncol. 2017 Apr;67:175-182
pubmed: 28351574
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Sep;26(9):1443-1449
pubmed: 28838945