Self-Perceived Mate Value Is Poorly Predicted by Demographic Variables.
demographics
mate preferences
mate value
psychometrics
self-perception
Journal
Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
ISSN: 1474-7049
Titre abrégé: Evol Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101219668
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
1
3
2019
pubmed:
1
3
2019
medline:
3
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mate value is a construct that can be measured in various ways, ranging from complex but difficult-to-obtain ratings all the way to single-item self-report measures. Due to low sample sizes in previous studies, little is known about the relationship between mate value and demographic variables. In this article, we tested the Mate Value Scale, a relatively new, short, 4-item self-report measure in two large samples. In the first sample of over 1,000, mostly college-age participants, the scale was found to be reliable and correlated with criterion variables in expected ways. In the second, larger sample, which included over 21,000 participants, we have tested for differences across demographics. Contrary to theoretical expectations and previous findings with smaller samples, the differences were either very small (sexual orientation, age, education) or small (sex, socioeconomic status, relationship status) in terms of their effect size. This suggests that the scale is not measuring "objective" mate value (as understood either in terms of fitness or actual mating decisions by potential partners on the "market"), but a self-perception of it, open to social comparison, relative standards, possibly even biases, raising questions about measuring self-perceived versus objective mate value.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30816069
doi: 10.1177/1474704919829037
pmc: PMC10481051
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1474704919829037Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36106
pubmed: 22558347
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 May;82(5):756-67
pubmed: 12003475
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 18;8:2210
pubmed: 29326632
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 01;6:1846
pubmed: 26648898
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jul;42(7):864-78
pubmed: 27189004
J Sex Res. 2018 Mar-Apr;55(3):395-406
pubmed: 28276929
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Jan;75:91-99
pubmed: 27810708
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002 Dec;23 Suppl 4:81-91
pubmed: 12496738
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1113-35
pubmed: 18954197
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Feb;72(2):346-61
pubmed: 9107005
Evol Psychol. 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1474704918763271
pubmed: 29534596
J Affect Disord. 2003 Jul;75(2):131-48
pubmed: 12798253
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):488-98
pubmed: 24061931
J Pers. 1994 Jun;62(2):199-218
pubmed: 8046573
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):72-89
pubmed: 9972554
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Dec;41(12):1697-711
pubmed: 26445853
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):472-80
pubmed: 7431205
Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):204-32
pubmed: 8483982