Protecting maize from rootworm damage with the combined application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Pseudomonas bacteria and entomopathogenic nematodes.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 02 2019
28 02 2019
Historique:
received:
24
09
2018
accepted:
28
01
2019
entrez:
1
3
2019
pubmed:
1
3
2019
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte, the western corn rootworm (WCR), is the most destructive pest of maize in North America, and has recently spread across central Europe. Its subterranean larval stages are hard to reach with pesticides and it has evolved resistance to conventional management practices. The application of beneficial soil organisms is being considered as a sustainable and environmental friendly alternative. In a previous study, the combined application in wheat fields of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, entomopathogenic Pseudomonas bacteria, and entomopathogenic nematodes was found to promote growth and protection against a natural pest infestation, without negative cross effects. Because of the insect-killing capacity of the bacteria and nematodes, we hypothesized that the application of these organisms would have similar or even greater beneficial effects in WCR-infested maize fields. During three consecutive years (2015-2017), we conducted trials in Missouri (USA) in which we applied the three organisms, alone or in combinations, in plots that were artificially infested with WCR and in non-infested control plots. For two of the three trials, we found that in plots treated with entomopathogenic nematodes and/or entomopathogenic Pseudomonas bacteria, roots were less damaged than the roots of plants in control plots. During one year, WCR survival was significantly lower in plots treated with Pseudomonas than in control plots, and the surviving larvae that were recovered from these plots were lighter. The bacterial and nematodes treatments also enhanced yield, assessed as total grain weight, in one of the trials. The effects of the treatments varied considerable among the three years, but they were always positive for the plants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30816250
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39753-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-39753-7
pmc: PMC6395644
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3127Références
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Aug;84(1):11-8
pubmed: 19568745
J Econ Entomol. 2001 Feb;94(1):106-11
pubmed: 11233098
J Econ Entomol. 2002 Dec;95(6):1261-6
pubmed: 12539840
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2007 Nov;92(4):367-89
pubmed: 17588129
Mycorrhiza. 2011 Jan;21(1):1-16
pubmed: 20803040
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Jul 31;4:287
pubmed: 23914197
J Econ Entomol. 2006 Jun;99(3):685-90
pubmed: 16813299
J Econ Entomol. 2009 Dec;102(6):2350-9
pubmed: 20069867
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Aug;32:62-68
pubmed: 27393937
J Econ Entomol. 2001 Feb;94(1):98-105
pubmed: 11233140
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013 Aug;26(8):835-43
pubmed: 23581824
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:337-59
pubmed: 16078888
Phytopathology. 2007 Feb;97(2):244-9
pubmed: 18944382
Bull Entomol Res. 2005 Oct;95(5):473-82
pubmed: 16197568
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Nov;11(11):789-99
pubmed: 24056930
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Jun;97(3):871-82
pubmed: 15279266
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 31;8:1809
pubmed: 29163562
Phytopathology. 2007 Feb;97(2):239-43
pubmed: 18944381
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Apr;3(4):307-19
pubmed: 15759041
Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:303-21
pubmed: 19067634
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 May;78(9):3214-20
pubmed: 22389379
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161120
pubmed: 27580176
Trends Plant Sci. 2010 Sep;15(9):507-14
pubmed: 20542720
Science. 2016 Nov 4;354(6312):634-637
pubmed: 27708055
PLoS Genet. 2012 Jul;8(7):e1002784
pubmed: 22792073
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Mar;21(3):187-198
pubmed: 26832945
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jul;23(7):873-8
pubmed: 15980861
Microbiology. 2005 Sep;151(Pt 9):3001-3009
pubmed: 16151210
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Sep;22(9):770-778
pubmed: 28757147
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Oct;15(10):579-590
pubmed: 28824177
Environ Entomol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1558-64
pubmed: 19161700
Mycorrhiza. 2016 Apr;26(3):209-14
pubmed: 26403242
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1990 Feb;10(2):55-9
pubmed: 1366379
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22629
pubmed: 21829470
J Econ Entomol. 2005 Feb;98(1):1-8
pubmed: 15765660
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Apr 10;4:81
pubmed: 23596447
Environ Microbiol. 2013 Mar;15(3):751-63
pubmed: 23033861
New Phytol. 2005 Oct;168(1):189-204
pubmed: 16159333
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Sep 17;4:356
pubmed: 24062756
Nat Prod Rep. 2009 Nov;26(11):1408-46
pubmed: 19844639
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 05;9:747
pubmed: 29922319
New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1406-23
pubmed: 25639293
Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):992
pubmed: 16284172
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jul;60(7):2553-60
pubmed: 16349332
ISME J. 2016 Oct;10(10):2527-42
pubmed: 26894448
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Jan;39(1):136-46
pubmed: 26147222