Accounting for interspecific competition and age structure in demographic analyses of density dependence improves predictions of fluctuations in population size.

Cyanistes caeruleus Parus major Competitive interactions density dependence density regulation population growth rate

Journal

Ecology letters
ISSN: 1461-0248
Titre abrégé: Ecol Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101121949

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 11 10 2018
revised: 26 11 2018
revised: 21 01 2019
accepted: 24 01 2019
pubmed: 1 3 2019
medline: 8 8 2019
entrez: 1 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Understanding species coexistence has long been a major goal of ecology. Coexistence theory for two competing species posits that intraspecific density dependence should be stronger than interspecific density dependence. Great tits and blue tits are two bird species that compete for food resources and nesting cavities. On the basis of long-term monitoring of these two competing species at sites across Europe, combining observational and manipulative approaches, we show that the strength of density regulation is similar for both species, and that individuals have contrasting abilities to compete depending on their age. For great tits, density regulation is driven mainly by intraspecific competition. In contrast, for blue tits, interspecific competition contributes as much as intraspecific competition, consistent with asymmetric competition between the two species. In addition, including age-specific effects of intra- and interspecific competition in density-dependence models improves predictions of fluctuations in population size by up to three times.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30816630
doi: 10.1111/ele.13237
doi:

Types de publication

Letter

Langues

eng

Pagination

797-806

Subventions

Organisme : Research Council of Norway
ID : 223257
Organisme : Research Council of Norway
ID : 267511

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Auteurs

Marlène Gamelon (M)

Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Stefan J G Vriend (SJG)

Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Steinar Engen (S)

Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Frank Adriaensen (F)

Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.

André A Dhondt (AA)

Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.

Simon R Evans (SR)

Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.

Erik Matthysen (E)

Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.

Ben C Sheldon (BC)

Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.

Bernt-Erik Saether (BE)

Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH