Nudging the better angels of our nature: A field experiment on morality and well-being.
Journal
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
ISSN: 1931-1516
Titre abrégé: Emotion
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101125678
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
1
3
2019
medline:
12
9
2020
entrez:
1
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A field experiment examines how moral behavior, moral thoughts, and self-benefiting behavior affect daily well-being. Using experience sampling technology, we randomly grouped participants over 10 days to either behave morally, have moral thoughts, or do something positive for themselves. Participants received treatment-specific instructions in the morning of 5 days and no instructions on the other 5 control days. At each day's end, participants completed measures that examined, among others, subjective well-being, self-perceived morality and empathy, and social isolation and closeness. Full analyses found limited evidence for treatment- versus control-day differences. However, restricting analyses to occasions on which participants complied with instructions revealed treatment- versus control-day main effects on all measures, while showing that self-perceived morality and empathy toward others particularly increased in the moral deeds and moral thoughts group. These findings suggest that moral behavior, moral thoughts, and self-benefiting behavior are all effective means of boosting well-being, but only moral deeds and, perhaps surprisingly, also moral thoughts strengthen the moral self-concept and empathy. Results from an additional study assessing laypeople's predictions suggest that people do not fully intuit this pattern of results. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30816744
pii: 2019-10284-001
doi: 10.1037/emo0000588
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM