Severe asthma-A population study perspective.


Journal

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
ISSN: 1365-2222
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Allergy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8906443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 03 10 2018
revised: 05 02 2019
accepted: 11 02 2019
pubmed: 1 3 2019
medline: 31 7 2020
entrez: 1 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Severe asthma is a considerable challenge for patients, health-care professionals and society. Few studies have estimated the prevalence of severe asthma according to modern definitions of which none based on a population study. To describe characteristics and estimate the prevalence of severe asthma in a large adult population-based asthma cohort followed for 10-28 years. N = 1006 subjects with asthma participated in a follow-up during 2012-14, when 830 (mean age 59 years, 56% women) still had current asthma. Severe asthma was defined according to three internationally well-known criteria: the ATS workshop definition from 2000 used in the US Severe Asthma Research Programme (SARP), the 2014 ATS/ERS Task force definition and the GINA 2017. All subjects with severe asthma according to any of these criteria were undergoing respiratory specialist care and were also contacted by telephone to verify treatment adherence. The prevalence of severe asthma according to the three definitions was 3.6% (US SARP), 4.8% (ERS/ATS Taskforce), and 6.1% (GINA) among subjects with current asthma. Although all were using high ICS doses and other maintenance treatment, >90% did not have controlled asthma according to the asthma control test. Severe asthma was related to age >50 years, nasal polyposis, impaired lung function, sensitization to aspergillus, and tended to be more common in women. Further, neutrophils in blood significantly discriminated severe asthma from other asthma. Severe asthma differed significantly from other asthma in terms of demographic, clinical and inflammatory characteristics, results suggesting possibilities for improved treatment regimens of severe asthma. The prevalence of severe asthma in this asthma cohort was 4%-6%, corresponding to approximately 0.5% of the general population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Severe asthma is a considerable challenge for patients, health-care professionals and society. Few studies have estimated the prevalence of severe asthma according to modern definitions of which none based on a population study.
OBJECTIVE
To describe characteristics and estimate the prevalence of severe asthma in a large adult population-based asthma cohort followed for 10-28 years.
METHODS
N = 1006 subjects with asthma participated in a follow-up during 2012-14, when 830 (mean age 59 years, 56% women) still had current asthma. Severe asthma was defined according to three internationally well-known criteria: the ATS workshop definition from 2000 used in the US Severe Asthma Research Programme (SARP), the 2014 ATS/ERS Task force definition and the GINA 2017. All subjects with severe asthma according to any of these criteria were undergoing respiratory specialist care and were also contacted by telephone to verify treatment adherence.
RESULTS
The prevalence of severe asthma according to the three definitions was 3.6% (US SARP), 4.8% (ERS/ATS Taskforce), and 6.1% (GINA) among subjects with current asthma. Although all were using high ICS doses and other maintenance treatment, >90% did not have controlled asthma according to the asthma control test. Severe asthma was related to age >50 years, nasal polyposis, impaired lung function, sensitization to aspergillus, and tended to be more common in women. Further, neutrophils in blood significantly discriminated severe asthma from other asthma.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Severe asthma differed significantly from other asthma in terms of demographic, clinical and inflammatory characteristics, results suggesting possibilities for improved treatment regimens of severe asthma. The prevalence of severe asthma in this asthma cohort was 4%-6%, corresponding to approximately 0.5% of the general population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30817038
doi: 10.1111/cea.13378
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

819-828

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

Helena Backman (H)

Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Sven-Arne Jansson (SA)

Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Caroline Stridsman (C)

Department of Health Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.

Berne Eriksson (B)

Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Deparment of Internal Medicine, Central County Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.

Linnea Hedman (L)

Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Britt-Marie Eklund (BM)

Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Thomas Sandström (T)

Section of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Anne Lindberg (A)

Section of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Bo Lundbäck (B)

Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Eva Rönmark (E)

Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH