Health-related Quality of Life and Postural Changes of Spinal Alignment in Female Adolescents Associated With Back Pain in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study.
Journal
Spine
ISSN: 1528-1159
Titre abrégé: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7610646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2019
15 Jul 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
3
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
entrez:
1
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A prospective cross-sectional study. To identify risk factors for chronic back pain and back pain at rest in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, particularly focusing on the psychological backgrounds of the patients and on postural changes of radiographical parameters for spinal alignment. Back pain has been recognized as a relatively common condition in AIS. However, the effect of patients' psychological backgrounds and dynamic changes of spinal alignment on back pain are unclear. One hundred two consecutive female AIS patients (mean age, 14.1 yrs [range, 10-18]) who first visited our outpatient clinic between July 2013 and December 2017 were included. Using SRS-22r questionnaire, the presence of chronic back pain and back pain at rest and the scores of self-image and mental health were evaluated. Using full-length standing and supine posteroanterior radiographs, parameters related to curve profiles and coronal global balance were measured, and postural changes of these parameters were calculated. From full-length standing lateral radiographs, sagittal spinal and spino-pelvic alignment parameters were also measured. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for back pain. The prevalence of chronic back pain was 22.5% and that of back pain at rest was 25.5%. Poor self-image and mental health scores in SRS-22r were identified as risk factors for chronic back pain. Higher Risser grade, poor self-image score, large postural changes of apical vertebral translation at the main thoracic curve, and hyperlordosis in the lumbar spine were identified as risk factors for back pain at rest. Psychological distress and large postural changes of spinal alignment played an important role in the occurrence of back pain. Physicians should pay more attention to mental healthcare of AIS patients as well as to radiographical assessments of curve severity for better health-related quality of life. 4.
Sections du résumé
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
A prospective cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To identify risk factors for chronic back pain and back pain at rest in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, particularly focusing on the psychological backgrounds of the patients and on postural changes of radiographical parameters for spinal alignment.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
BACKGROUND
Back pain has been recognized as a relatively common condition in AIS. However, the effect of patients' psychological backgrounds and dynamic changes of spinal alignment on back pain are unclear.
METHODS
METHODS
One hundred two consecutive female AIS patients (mean age, 14.1 yrs [range, 10-18]) who first visited our outpatient clinic between July 2013 and December 2017 were included. Using SRS-22r questionnaire, the presence of chronic back pain and back pain at rest and the scores of self-image and mental health were evaluated. Using full-length standing and supine posteroanterior radiographs, parameters related to curve profiles and coronal global balance were measured, and postural changes of these parameters were calculated. From full-length standing lateral radiographs, sagittal spinal and spino-pelvic alignment parameters were also measured. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for back pain.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The prevalence of chronic back pain was 22.5% and that of back pain at rest was 25.5%. Poor self-image and mental health scores in SRS-22r were identified as risk factors for chronic back pain. Higher Risser grade, poor self-image score, large postural changes of apical vertebral translation at the main thoracic curve, and hyperlordosis in the lumbar spine were identified as risk factors for back pain at rest.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Psychological distress and large postural changes of spinal alignment played an important role in the occurrence of back pain. Physicians should pay more attention to mental healthcare of AIS patients as well as to radiographical assessments of curve severity for better health-related quality of life.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
4.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30817729
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002996
pii: 00007632-201907150-00010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E833-E840Références
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008; 371:1527–1537.
Ueno M, Takaso M, Nakazawa T, et al. A 5-year epidemiological study on the prevalence rate of idiopathic scoliosis in Tokyo: school screening of more than 250,000 children. J Orthop Sci 2011; 16:1–6.
Altaf F, Heran MK, Wilson LF. Back pain in children and adolescents. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:717–723.
Balague F, Pellise F. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and back pain. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2016; 11:27.
Kovacs FM, Gestoso M, Gil del Real MT, et al. Risk factors for non-specific low back pain in schoolchildren and their parents: a population based study. Pain 2003; 103:259–268.
Rushton PR, Grevitt MP. Comparison of untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with normal controls: a review and statistical analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:778–785.
Theroux J, Le May S, Hebert JJ, et al. Back pain prevalence is associated with curve-type and severity in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:E914–E919.
Mayo NE, Goldberg MS, Poitras B, et al. The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part III: back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19:1573–1581.
Sato T, Hirano T, Ito T, et al. Back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: epidemiological study for 43,630 pupils in Niigata City, Japan. Eur Spine J 2011; 20:274–279.
Stump PR, Dalben Gda S. Mechanisms and clinical management of pain. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26 (suppl 1):115–119.
Ramirez N, Johnston CE, Browne RH. The prevalence of back pain in children who have idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79:364–368.
Smorgick Y, Mirovsky Y, Baker KC, et al. Predictors of back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical candidates. J Pediatr Orthop 2013; 33:289–292.
Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:1197–1201.
Watanabe K, Hasegawa K, Hirano T, et al. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II: relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:1202–1205.
Makino T, Kaito T, Kashii M, et al. Low back pain and patient-reported QOL outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis without corrective surgery. Springerplus 2015; 4:397.
Risser JC. The Iliac apophysis; an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1958; 11:111–119.
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A:1169–1181.
Cerny P, Marik I, Pallova I. The radiographic method for evaluation of axial vertebral rotation—presentation of the new method. Scoliosis 2014; 9:11.
Hashimoto H, Sase T, Arai Y, et al. Validation of a Japanese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:E141–E146.
Sato T, Ito T, Hirano T, et al. Low back pain in childhood and adolescence: a cross-sectional study in Niigata City. Eur Spine J 2008; 17:1441–1447.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, et al. Epidemiology of low back pain in adults. Neuromodulation 2014; 17 (suppl 2):3–10.
Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S, et al. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J 2014; 14:816–836.
Dolphens M, Vansteelandt S, Cagnie B, et al. Multivariable modeling of factors associated with spinal pain in young adolescence. Eur Spine J 2016; 25:2809–2821.
Erne C, Elfering A. Low back pain at school: unique risk deriving from unsatisfactory grade in maths and school-type recommendation. Eur Spine J 2011; 20:2126–2133.
Trevelyan FC, Legg SJ. Risk factors associated with back pain in New Zealand school children. Ergonomics 2011; 54:257–262.
Parent EC, Wong D, Hill D, et al. The association between Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:315–322.
Qiao J, Zhu F, Xu L, et al. T1 pelvic angle: a new predictor for postoperative sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:2103–2107.
Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, et al. International Spine Study Group (ISSG). Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:E803–E812.
Christie HJ, Kumar S, Warren SA. Postural aberrations in low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:218–224.
Sorensen CJ, Norton BJ, Callaghan JP, et al. Is lumbar lordosis related to low back pain development during prolonged standing? Man Ther 2015; 20:553–557.
Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV. Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63:702–712.