The Accuracy of Digital Imaging in Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Iran: A Pilot Study.
ROP Digital Imaging
Ret Cam
Telescreening
Journal
Journal of ophthalmic & vision research
ISSN: 2008-2010
Titre abrégé: J Ophthalmic Vis Res
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 101497643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
2
3
2019
pubmed:
2
3
2019
medline:
2
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal image reading in the diagnosis of referral-warranted retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Infants referred to the ROP clinic underwent fundus examination through indirect ophthalmoscopy. Fundus photographs were acquired using RetCam (shuttle 2; Clarity medical systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Four retinal specialists who were blind to patients' information reviewed the RetCam fundus photographs. By comparing the results of photographs' readings with that of indirect ophthalmoscopy as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of telescreening was determined. A total of 147 treatment-naïve patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Mean gestational age (GA) was 28.6 ± 2.0 weeks. Digital retinal imaging had sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 35% in detecting referral-warranted ROP in our study. Positive predictive value of digital photography was 80%, and negative predictive value was 43%. Digital photography for diagnosis of ROP may show good potential as a screening modality in developing countries. It can facilitate early diagnosis, prevent unnecessary referrals, and be implemented for investigational purpose. However, the overall study result did not provide evidence to propose digital photography as a substitute for indirect ophthalmoscopy in the diagnosis of ROP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30820285
doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_187_17
pii: JOVR-14-38
pmc: PMC6388530
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38-41Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Feb;119(2):268-72
pubmed: 11176990
J AAPOS. 2002 Apr;6(2):64-70
pubmed: 11997800
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2113-7
pubmed: 14597517
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec;121(12):1684-94
pubmed: 14662586
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e518-25
pubmed: 15805336
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):572-6
pubmed: 16452383
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;54(1):35-8
pubmed: 16531668
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;124(3):322-7
pubmed: 16534051
J AAPOS. 2006 Apr;10(2):107-11
pubmed: 16678743
Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1547-52
pubmed: 16828505
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):527-31
pubmed: 17766525
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;125(11):1531-8
pubmed: 17998515
Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3 Suppl):S47-54
pubmed: 18317345
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;93(3):355-9
pubmed: 19028742
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;127(6):803-4
pubmed: 19506203
J AAPOS. 2009 Oct;13(5):438-45
pubmed: 19840720
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;39(1):23-9
pubmed: 20796264
J AAPOS. 2012 Jun;16(3):229-33
pubmed: 22681938
Can J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;50(2):101-6
pubmed: 25863848
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Oct;20(5):335-45
pubmed: 26092301
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015 Oct-Dec;10(4):355-7
pubmed: 27051477
Pediatrics. 1988 May;81(5):697-706
pubmed: 2895910
Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;102(8):1130-4
pubmed: 6547831
Lancet. 1997 Jul 5;350(9070):12-4
pubmed: 9217713