Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries-protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial.
Africa
Evaluation
Non-physician clinicians
Supervision
Surgery
Surgical training
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
08
06
2018
accepted:
30
01
2019
entrez:
2
3
2019
pubmed:
2
3
2019
medline:
2
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
District-level hospitals (DLHs) can play an important role in the delivery of essential surgical services for rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa if adequately prepared and supported. This article describes the protocol for the evaluation of the Scaling up Safe Surgery for District and Rural Populations in Africa (SURG-Africa) project which aims to strengthen the capacity in district-level hospitals (DLHs) in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia to deliver safe, quality surgery. The intervention comprises a programme of quarterly supervisory visits to surgically active district-level hospitals by specialists from referral hospitals and the establishment of a mobile phone-based consultation network. The overall objective is to test and refine the model with a view to scaling up to national level. This mixed-methods controlled pilot trial will test the feasibility of the proposed supervision model in making quality-assured surgery available at DLHs. Firstly, the study will conduct a quantitative assessment of surgical service delivery at district facilities, looking at hospital preparedness, capacity and productivity, and how these are affected by the intervention. Secondly, the study will monitor changes in referral patterns from DLHs to a higher level of care as a result of the intervention. Data on utilisation of the mobile based-support network will also be collected. The analysis will compare changes over time and between intervention and control hospitals. The third element of the study will involve a qualitative assessment to obtain a better understanding of the functionality of DLH surgical systems and how these have been influenced by the intervention. It will also provide further information on feasibility, impact and sustainability of the supervision model. We seek to test a model of district-level capacity building through regular supervision by specialists and mobile phone technology-supported consultations to make safe surgical services more accessible, equitable and sustainable for rural populations in the target countries. The results of this study will provide robust evidence to inform and guide local actors in the national scale-up of the supervision model. Lessons learned will be transferred to the wider region.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
District-level hospitals (DLHs) can play an important role in the delivery of essential surgical services for rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa if adequately prepared and supported. This article describes the protocol for the evaluation of the Scaling up Safe Surgery for District and Rural Populations in Africa (SURG-Africa) project which aims to strengthen the capacity in district-level hospitals (DLHs) in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia to deliver safe, quality surgery. The intervention comprises a programme of quarterly supervisory visits to surgically active district-level hospitals by specialists from referral hospitals and the establishment of a mobile phone-based consultation network. The overall objective is to test and refine the model with a view to scaling up to national level.
METHODS
METHODS
This mixed-methods controlled pilot trial will test the feasibility of the proposed supervision model in making quality-assured surgery available at DLHs. Firstly, the study will conduct a quantitative assessment of surgical service delivery at district facilities, looking at hospital preparedness, capacity and productivity, and how these are affected by the intervention. Secondly, the study will monitor changes in referral patterns from DLHs to a higher level of care as a result of the intervention. Data on utilisation of the mobile based-support network will also be collected. The analysis will compare changes over time and between intervention and control hospitals. The third element of the study will involve a qualitative assessment to obtain a better understanding of the functionality of DLH surgical systems and how these have been influenced by the intervention. It will also provide further information on feasibility, impact and sustainability of the supervision model.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
We seek to test a model of district-level capacity building through regular supervision by specialists and mobile phone technology-supported consultations to make safe surgical services more accessible, equitable and sustainable for rural populations in the target countries. The results of this study will provide robust evidence to inform and guide local actors in the national scale-up of the supervision model. Lessons learned will be transferred to the wider region.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30820336
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0409-6
pii: 409
pmc: PMC6378729
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
25Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, the project consortium lead, under approval no. REC 1417. In the implementation countries, ethical approval was received from the College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee in Malawi (approval no. P.05/17/2179), the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (approval no. 005-05-17), the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College Research Ethics and Review Committee (approval no. CRERC 2026) and the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (approval no. NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2600).Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Références
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Oct;60(10):854-7
pubmed: 16973531
Hum Resour Health. 2007 Jun 14;5:17
pubmed: 17570847
Lancet. 2007 Dec 22;370(9605):2158-63
pubmed: 17574662
Lancet. 2007 Sep 22;370(9592):1013-5
pubmed: 17889228
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Oct;89(7):722-4
pubmed: 17959015
Hum Resour Health. 2007 Dec 06;5:27
pubmed: 18062808
PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 3;5(6):e121
pubmed: 18532875
PLoS Med. 2009 May 19;6(5):e1000078
pubmed: 19440533
World J Surg. 2009 Oct;33(10):2063-8
pubmed: 19653031
PLoS Med. 2009 Dec;6(12):e1000200
pubmed: 20027218
World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):466-70
pubmed: 20063094
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1:S40-6
pubmed: 20147663
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):493-9
pubmed: 21191583
Trop Doct. 2011 Apr;41(2):71-5
pubmed: 21303987
BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2600
pubmed: 21571914
Confl Health. 2011 Jul 15;5:12
pubmed: 21762491
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Aug;27(5):365-73
pubmed: 21821667
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):8-23
pubmed: 22057752
Hum Resour Health. 2011 Nov 09;9:28
pubmed: 22071096
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 14;11:336
pubmed: 22168915
World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1970-7
pubmed: 22488329
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58415
pubmed: 23555581
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 16;13:140
pubmed: 23590288
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Apr;35(4):355-361
pubmed: 23660044
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 01;13:292
pubmed: 23915241
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):277-9
pubmed: 23953765
World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):269-80
pubmed: 24218153
S Afr Med J. 2013 Jul 29;104(1):57-60
pubmed: 24388091
World J Surg. 2014 Sep;38(9):2195-9
pubmed: 24696058
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):e38-48
pubmed: 24832401
Trials. 2014 Sep 15;15:359
pubmed: 25224756
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):569-624
pubmed: 25924834
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jun;3(6):e316-23
pubmed: 25926087
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jun;3(6):e298-9
pubmed: 26001569
World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2115-25
pubmed: 26239773
Lancet. 2015 Apr 27;385 Suppl 2:S42
pubmed: 26313091
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2015 Apr-Jun;13(50):186-92
pubmed: 26643841
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;132(1):117-25
pubmed: 26653397
Injury. 2016 May;47(5):1128-34
pubmed: 26725708
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Mar;121(3):248-54
pubmed: 26868466
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Mar;4(3):e165-74
pubmed: 26916818
World J Surg. 2016 Nov;40(11):2611-2619
pubmed: 27351714
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Jun 27;4(2):311-25
pubmed: 27353623
J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):242-50
pubmed: 27451893
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):568-580.e2
pubmed: 27469627
JAMA Surg. 2016 Nov 1;151(11):1064-1069
pubmed: 27580500
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64
pubmed: 27965879
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Apr;64(4):353-357
pubmed: 28028672
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2187-2192
pubmed: 28349322
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2193-2199
pubmed: 28405807
Trop Doct. 2017 Oct;47(4):294-299
pubmed: 28682219
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1315-1326
pubmed: 28783227
World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):46-53
pubmed: 28791448
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Aug 22;15(1):53
pubmed: 28830528
Global Health. 2017 Oct 3;13(1):77
pubmed: 28974233
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Nov 7;15(1):77
pubmed: 29115962
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1610-1616
pubmed: 29209733
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 08;7(6):481-484
pubmed: 29935124
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202
pubmed: 9611617