Overview of reviews of standardised occupation-based instruments for use in occupational therapy practice.
assessment
evaluation
psychometrics
umbrella review
Journal
Australian occupational therapy journal
ISSN: 1440-1630
Titre abrégé: Aust Occup Ther J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 15420200R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
accepted:
29
01
2019
pubmed:
2
3
2019
medline:
28
8
2020
entrez:
2
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Using standardised instruments is one approach to support evidence-based practice. Referring to systematic reviews is an option to identify suitable instruments. However, with an abundance of systematic reviews available, therapists are challenged to identify an appropriate instrument to use. Therefore, this overview of reviews aimed to summarise relevant systematic review findings about standardised occupation-based instruments relevant for occupational therapy practice. An overview of reviews was conducted. A systematic search was performed on four databases up to March 2018. Included systematic reviews were analysed for quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). A total of 2187 articles were identified after removing duplicates. Ultimately, 58 systematic reviews were identified that yielded 641 instruments. From those, 45 instruments were selected for appraisal as they met the inclusion criteria of being developed mainly by occupational therapists and were recommended in the summarised findings from the systematic reviews. The instruments were classified according to the following occupation domains: (i) multidimensional, (ii) activities of daily living, (iii) productivity, (iv) social, (v) sleep/rest, (vi) sexuality and (vii) spirituality. No systematic review was identified that specifically focussed on occupations related to school/education, leisure and play. Certain occupation domains such as activities of daily living, social and sleep/rest received high attention amongst researchers. There is a need for systematic reviews of instruments to measure education/school, play and leisure. Limited numbers of instruments were developed by occupational therapists outside the occupation domain of activities of daily living, and in areas of practice other than children and older people. Nevertheless, this overview can give some guidance for occupational therapists in selecting a suitable occupational therapy instrument for practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30821362
doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12572
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
428-445Informations de copyright
© 2019 Occupational Therapy Australia.
Références
*Abramson, C. E., McBride, K. E., Konnyu, K. J., Elliott, S. L. & Team, S. R. (2008). Sexual health outcome measures for individuals with a spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord, 46 (5), 320-324. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102136
*Alheresh, R., Vaughan, M., LaValley, M. P., Coster, W. & Keysor, J. J. (2016). Critical appraisal of the quality of literature evaluating psychometric properties of arthritis work outcome assessments: A systematic review. Arthritis Care & Research, 68 (9), 1354-1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22814
Alotaibi, N. M., Reed, K. & Shaban Nadar, M. (2009). Assessments used in occupational therapy practice: An exploratory study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 23 (4), 302-318. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380570903222583
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain & Process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl 1), S1-S48. https://doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
Baeza, J. I., Boaz, A. & Fraser, A.; European Implementation Score (EIS) Collaborative Group. (2016). The roles of specialisation and evidence-based practice in interprofessional jurisdictions: A qualitative study of stroke services in England, Sweden and Poland. Social Science & Medicine, 155, 15-23. https://doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.001
*Baker, A., Unsworth, C. A. & Lannin, N. A. (2015). Determining fitness to drive: A systematic review of the methods and assessments used after mild traumatic brain injury. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78 (2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022614562405
*Barten, J. A., Pisters, M. F., Huisman, P. A., Takken, T. & Veenhof, C. (2012). Measurement properties of patient-specific instruments measuring physical function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65 (6), 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.005
*Bartula, I. & Sherman, K. A. (2013). Screening for sexual dysfunction in women diagnosed with breast cancer: Systematic review and recommendations. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 141 (2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2685-9
Bastian, H., Glasziou, P. & Chalmers, I. (2010). Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Medicine, 7 (9), e1000326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
*Bautista, M., Whittingham, K., Edwards, P. & Boyd, R. N. (2018). Psychometric properties of parent and child reported sleep assessment tools in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 60 (2), 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13609
*Beauchamp, M. K., Schmidt, C. T., Pedersen, M. M., Bean, J. F. & Jette, A. M. (2014). Psychometric properties of the late-life function and disability instrument: A systematic review. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 12. https://doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-12
*Bissett, M., Cusick, A. & Lannin, N. A. (2013). Functional assessments utilised in emergency departments: A systematic review. Age and Ageing, 42 (2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs187
*Bouffard, J., Bertrand-Charette, M. & Roy, J. S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 30 (4), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515579286
*Burgess, P. M., Harris, M. G., Coombs, T. & Pirkis, J. E. (2017). A systematic review of clinician-rated instruments to assess adults’ levels of functioning in specialised public sector mental health services. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 51(4), 338-354, https://doi:10.1177/0004867416688098
Cheng, A. S. & Cheng, S. W. (2010). The predictive validity of job-specific functional capacity evaluation on the employment status of patients with nonspecific low back pain. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52 (7), 719-724. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181e48d47
*Chumney, D., Nollinger, K., Shesko, K., Skop, K., Spencer, M. & Newton, R. A. (2010). Ability of Functional Independence Measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: Systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 47 (1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2009.08.0140
Colquhoun, H. L., Lamontagne, M. E., Duncan, E. A., Fiander, M., Champagne, C. & Grimshaw, J. M. (2017). A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31 (3), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516644309
Cook, D. A. & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. American Journal of Medicine, 119 (2), 116.e117-116.e116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
Cooper, H. & Koenka, A. C. (2012). The overview of reviews: Unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. American Psychologist, 67 (6), 446-462. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027119
*Cordier, R., Speyer, R., Chen, Y. W., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Brown, T., Bourke-Taylor, H. et al. (2015). Evaluating the psychometric quality of social skills measures: A systematic review. PLoS One, 10 (7), e0132299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132299
*Cordier, R., Chen, Y. W., Speyer, R., Totino, R., Doma, K., Leicht, A. et al. (2016). Child-report measures of occupational performance: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147751. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147751
*Cordier, R., Milbourn, B., Martin, R., Buchanan, A., Chung, D. & Speyer, R. (2017). A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179109. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179109
Corr, S. & Siddons, L. (2005). An introduction to the selection of outcome measures. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68 (5), 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260506800503
Costas, R. & Bordons, M. (2011). Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics, 88 (1), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z
*Crowe, L. M., Beauchamp, M. H., Catroppa, C. & Anderson, V. (2011). Social function assessment tools for children and adolescents: A systematic review from 1988 to 2010. Clinical Psychology Review, 31 (5), 767-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.008
*Darzins, S., Imms, C. & Di Stefano, M. (2013). Measurement properties of the personal care participation assessment and resource tool: A systematic review. Disability & Rehabilitation, 35 (4), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.690819
Darzins, S. W., Imms, C., Di Stefano, M. & Radia-George, C. A. (2016). Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83 (4), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417416648446
*de Baets, S., Calders, P., Schalley, N., Vermeulen, K., Vertriest, S., van Peteghem, L. et al. (2017). Updating the evidence on functional capacity evaluation methods: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, pp. 1-11. https://doi:10.1007/s10926-017-9734-x
*Devine, E. B., Hakim, Z. & Green, J. (2005). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments measuring sleep dysfunction in adults. Pharmacoeconomics, 23 (9), 889-912. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523090-00003
*Donovan, K. A. & Jacobsen, P. B. (2011). The Fatigue Symptom Inventory: A systematic review of its psychometric properties. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19 (2), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0989-4
Duncan, E. A. S. & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12 (96), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
*Erickson, J. M. (2009). Approaches to measure sleep-wake disturbances in adolescents with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 24 (4), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2008.03.004
Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J. & Terwee, C. B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92 (6), 983-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006
*Federici, S., Bracalenti, M., Meloni, F. & Luciano, J. V. (2017). World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: An international systematic review. Disability & Rehabilitation, 39(23), 2347-2380, https://doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177
Field, D. A., Miller, W. C., Ryan, S. E., Jarus, T. & Abundo, A. (2016). Measuring participation for children and youth with power mobility needs: A systematic review of potential health measurement tools. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97 (3), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.428
*Figueiredo, S., Korner-Bitensky, N., Rochette, A. & Desrosiers, J. (2010). Use of the LIFE-H in stroke rehabilitation: A structured review of its psychometric properties. Disability & Rehabilitation, 32 (9), 705-712. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903295458
Fisher, A. G. (2014). Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21 (Suppl. 1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2014.952912
Fristedt, S., Elgmark Andersson, E. & Unsworth, C. A. (2013). The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the self-care and transfer scales and intra-rater reliability of all scales of the Swedish translation of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT-S). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20 (3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2013.777940.
*Furlan, J. C., Noonan, V., Singh, A. & Fehlings, M. G. (2011). Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Neurotrauma, 28 (8), 1413-1430. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.1148
*Garrow, A. P., Yorke, J., Khan, N., Vestbo, J., Singh, D. & Tyson, S. (2015). Systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in assessment and measurement of sleep disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 10, 293-307. https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s68093
*Gouttebarge, V., Wind, H., Kuijer, P. P. F. & Frings-Dresen, M. H. (2004). Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: A systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 77 (8), 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0549-7
Gustafsson, L., Molineux, M. & Bennett, S. (2014). Contemporary occupational therapy practice: The challenges of being evidence based and philosophically congruent. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61 (2), 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12110
*Harvey, A., Robin, J., Morris, M. E., Graham, H. K. & Baker, R. (2008). A systematic review of measures of activity limitation for children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50 (3), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02027.x
*Högl, B., Arnulf, I., Comella, C., Ferreira, J., Iranzo, A., Tilley, B. et al. (2010). Scales to assess sleep impairment in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders, 25(16), 2704-2716, https://doi:10.1002/mds.23190
*Holden, S. K., Jones, W. E., Baker, K. A., Boersma, I. M. & Kluger, B. M. (2016). Outcome measures for Parkinson's disease dementia: A systematic review. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 3 (1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12225
*Innes, E. (2006). Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluations: An update. International Journal of Disability Management, 1 (1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1375/jdmr.1.1.135
*Innes, E. & Straker, L. (1999a). Reliability of work-related assessments. Work, 13 (2), 107-124.
*Innes, E. & Straker, L. (1999b). Validity of work-related assessments. Work, 13 (2), 125-152.
*Ireland, P. & Johnston, L. M. (2012). Measures of self-care independence for children with osteochondrodysplasia: A clinimetric review. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 32 (1), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2011.593619
*James, S., Ziviani, J. & Boyd, R. (2014). A systematic review of activities of daily living measures for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 56 (3), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12226
*Janaudis-Ferreira, T., Beauchamp, M. K., Robles, P. G., Goldstein, R. S. & Brooks, D. (2014). Measurement of activities of daily living in patients with COPD : A systematic review. Chest, 145 (2), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-0016
Jesus, T. S. (2016). Systematic reviews and clinical trials in rehabilitation: Comprehensive analyses of publication trends. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97, 1853-1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.017
*Ji, X. & Liu, J. (2016). Subjective sleep measures for adolescents: A systematic review. Child Care Health and Development, 42 (6), 825-839. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12376
Jones, M. K., Weerakoon, P. & Pynor, R. A. (2005). Survey of occupational therapy students’ attitudes towards sexual issues in clinical practice. Occupational Therapy International, 12 (2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.18
*Kaur, N., Belchior, P., Gelinas, I. & Bier, N. (2016). Critical appraisal of questionnaires to assess functional impairment in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 28 (9), 1425-1439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021600017X
*Kay, L. G., Bundy, A. C., Clemson, L., Cheal, B. & Glendenning, T. (2012). Contribution of off-road tests to predicting on-road performance: A critical review of tests. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59 (1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00989.x
*Kendzerska, T. B., Smith, P. M., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Leung, R. S. & Tomlinson, G. A. (2014). Evaluation of the measurement properties of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 18 (4), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2013.08.002
Leong, H. M., Carter, M. & Stephenson, J. (2013). Sensory integration therapy in Malaysia and Singapore: Sources of information and reasons for use in early intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48 (3), 421-435. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2013.854876
*Lewandowski, A. S., Toliver-Sokol, M. & Palermo, T. M. (2011). Evidence-based review of subjective pediatric sleep measures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36 (7), 780-793. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsq119
Liu, K. P. & Fong, A. K. (2010). Overview of occupational therapy practice with children in Hong Kong. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 3 (3), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2010.515183
Lohman, H. L., Kobrin, A. & Chang, W. P. (2017). Exploring the activity of daily living of sexual activity: A survey in occupational therapy education. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5 (2), 9. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1289
*Lotzin, A., Lu, X. X., Kriston, L., Schiborr, J., Musal, T., Romer, G. et al. (2015). Observational tools for measuring parent-infant interaction: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18 (2), 99-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-015-0180-z
*Lucchetti, G., Lucchetti, A. L. G. & Vallada, H. (2013). Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: A systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 131 (2), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802013000100022
Mackenzie, L. (2017). Evaluation of the clinical utility of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST). Disability & Rehabilitation, 39 (15), 1489-1501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1204015
*Magasi, S. & Post, M. W. (2010). A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91 (9), S17-S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.011
Marcelo, A., Gavino, A., Isip-Tan, I. T., Apostol-Nicodemus, L., Mesa-Gaerlan, F. J., Firaza, P. N. et al. (2013). A comparison of the accuracy of clinical decisions based on full-text articles and on journal abstracts alone: A study among residents in a tertiary care hospital. Evidence Based Medicine, 18 (2), 48. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2012-100537
*Mausbach, B. T., Moore, R., Bowie, C., Cardenas, V. & Patterson, T. L. (2009). A review of instruments for measuring functional recovery in those diagnosed with psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35 (2), 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn152
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L. et al. (2010). International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: Results of the COSMIN study. Journal of Clinical Epidemology, 63 (7), 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
*Mollayeva, T., Thurairajah, P., Burton, K., Mollayeva, S., Shapiro, C. M. & Colantonio, A. (2016). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 25, 52-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2015.01.009
*Mollayeya, T., Kendzerska, T. & Colantonio, A. (2013). Self-report instruments for assessing sleep dysfunction in an adult traumatic brain injury population: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 17 (6), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2013.02.001
*Monjazebi, F., Dalvandi, A., Ebadi, A., Khankeh, H. R., Rahgozar, M. & Richter, J. (2015). Functional status assessment of COPD based on ability to perform daily living activities: A systematic review of paper and pencil instruments. Global Journal of Health Science, 8 (3), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n3p210
*Monod, S., Brennan, M., Rochat, T. E., Martin, E., Rochat, S. & Bula, C. J. (2011). Instruments measuring spirituality in clinical research: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26 (11), 1345-1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1769-7
Morris, D. N. (2013). Perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care in occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 29 (1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2013.761109
*Noonan, V. K., Kopec, J. A., Noreau, L., Singer, J. & Dvorak, M. F. (2009). A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31 (23), 1883-1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280902846947
O'Grady, M. G. & Dusing, S. C. (2015). Reliability and validity of play-based assessments of motor and cognitive skills for infants and young children: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 95 (1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140111
Pedersen, T. J. & Kistensen, H. K. (2016). A critical discourse analysis of the attitudes of occupational therapists and physiotherapists towards the systematic use of standardised outcome measurement. Disability & Rehabilitation, 38 (16), 1592-1602. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1107630
*Peer, J. E. & Tenhula, W. (2010). Assessment of vocational functioning in serious mental illness: A review of situational assessment and performance based measures. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 32 (3), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2010-0508
Pettersson, I., Pettersson, V. & Frisk, M. (2012). ICF from an occupational therapy perspective in adult care: An integrative literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19 (3), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.557087
Pieper, D., Mathes, T. & Eikermann, M. (2014). Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies? BMC Research Notes, 7 (609), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-609
Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W. et al. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27 (5), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
*Rainey, L., van Nispen, R., van der Zee, C. & van Rens, G. (2014). Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 23 (10), 2793-2808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0743-3
Romli, M. H. & Wan Yunus, F. (2016). Malaysian occupational therapists’ perspective on prayer activity of Muslim clients. Education in Medicine Journal, 8 (4), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v8i4.448
*Sakzewski, L., Boyd, R. & Ziviani, J. (2007). Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49 (3), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00232.x
Sharif, M. O., Janjua Sharif, F. N., Ali, H. & Ahmed, F. (2013). Systematic Reviews Explained: AMSTAR-How to Tell the Good From the Bad and the Ugly. Oral Health and Dental Management, 12 (1), 9-16.
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C. et al. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7 (10), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J. et al. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
Shi, Y. & Howe, T.-H. (2016). A survey of occupational therapy practice in Beijing. China. Occupational Therapy International, 23 (2), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1423
*Sikkes, S. A. M., Klerk, E., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Scheltens, P. & Uitdehaag, B. M. J. (2009). A systematic review of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales in dementia: Room for improvement. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 80 (1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.155838
Skinner, A. & Turner-Stokes, L. (2006). The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20 (7), 609-615. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215506cr981oa
Smart, A. (2006). A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18 (5), 377-382. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl034
Stapleton, T. & McBrearty, C. (2009). Use of standardised assessments and outcome measures among a sample of Irish occupational therapists working with adults with physical disabilities. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72 (2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260907200203
*Swinkels, R. A., Dijkstra, P. U. & Bouter, L. M. (2005). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of instruments to assess disabilities in personal care in patients with rheumatic disorders: A systematic review. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology, 23 (1), 71-79.
Tam, W. W. S., Lo, K. K. H., Khalechelvam, P., Seah, J. & Goh, S. Y. S. (2017). Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17 (1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0432-3.
Townsend, E. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT Publication.
*Tse, T., Douglas, J., Lentin, P. & Carey, L. (2013). Measuring participation after stroke: A review of frequently used tools. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94 (1), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.002
*Turner-Stokes, L. & Siegert, R. J. (2013). A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM. Disability & Rehabilitation, 35 (22), 1885-1895. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.766271
Unsworth, C. A. (2000). Measuring the outcome of occupational therapy: Tools and resources. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 47 (4), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1630.2000.00239.x
Unsworth, C. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice depends on the routine use of outcome measures. British Jounal of Occupational Therapy, 74 (5), 209. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802211X13046730116371
Unsworth, C. A., Coulson, M., Swinton, L., Cole, H. & Sarigiannis, M. (2015). Determination of the minimal clinically important difference on the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Disability & Rehabilitation, 37 (11), 997-1003. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.952450
Unsworth, C. A., Timmer, A. & Wales, K. (2018). Reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 65 (5), 376-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12476
*Vergauwen, K., Huijnen, I. P. J., Kos, D., Van De Velde, D., Van Eupen, I. & Meeus, M. (2015). Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review. Disability & Rehabilitation, 37 (19), 1706-1716. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.978507
*Wales, K., Clemson, L., Lannin, N. & Cameron, I. (2016). Functional assessments used by occupational therapists with older adults at risk of activity and participation limitations: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 11 (2), e0147980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147980
Wesson, J., Clemson, L., Brodaty, H. & Reppermund, S. (2016). Estimating functional cognition in older adults using observational assessments of task performance in complex everyday activities: A systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68 (1), 335-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.024
*Williams, R. M., Schmuck, G., Allwood, S., Sanchez, M., Shea, R. & Wark, G. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of health-related work outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17 (3), 504-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9093-0
World Health Organisation. (2001). International clasification of functioning, disability and health. Retrieved from http://psychiatr.ru/download/1313?view=name=CF_18.pdf
Yang, M., Ding, X. & Dong, B. (2014). The measurement of disability in the elderly: A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Questionnaires. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 15(2), 150.e151 e150.e159, https://doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.004