Contrasting controls on tree ring isotope variation for Amazon floodplain and terra firme trees.
Cedrela odorata
Macrolobium acaciifolium
carbon isotopes
dual isotope
oxygen isotopes
tropical forests
Journal
Tree physiology
ISSN: 1758-4469
Titre abrégé: Tree Physiol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100955338
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
received:
18
09
2018
revised:
10
12
2018
accepted:
15
01
2019
pubmed:
3
3
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
3
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Isotopes in tropical trees rings can improve our understanding of tree responses to climate. We assessed how climate and growing conditions affect tree-ring oxygen and carbon isotopes (δ18OTR and δ13CTR) in four Amazon trees. We analysed within-ring isotope variation for two terra firme (non-flooded) and two floodplain trees growing at sites with varying seasonality. We find distinct intra-annual patterns of δ18OTR and δ13CTR driven mostly by seasonal variation in weather and source water δ18O. Seasonal variation in isotopes was lowest for the tree growing under the wettest conditions. Tree ring cellulose isotope models based on existing theory reproduced well observed within-ring variation with possible contributions of both stomatal and mesophyll conductance to variation in δ13CTR. Climate analysis reveal that terra firme δ18OTR signals were related to basin-wide precipitation, indicating a source water δ18O influence, while floodplain trees recorded leaf enrichment effects related to local climate. Thus, intrinsically different processes (source water vs leaf enrichment) affect δ18OTR in the two different species analysed. These differences are likely a result of both species-specific traits and of the contrasting growing conditions in the floodplains and terra firme environments. Simultaneous analysis of δ13CTR and δ18OTR supports this interpretation as it shows strongly similar intra-annual patterns for both isotopes in the floodplain trees arising from a common control by leaf stomatal conductance, while terra firme trees showed less covariation between the two isotopes. Our results are interesting from a plant physiological perspective and have implications for climate reconstructions as trees record intrinsically different processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30824929
pii: 5368478
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz009
pmc: PMC6594573
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Isotopes
0
Oxygen Isotopes
0
Oxygen-18
0
Carbon-13
FDJ0A8596D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
845-860Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):834-8
pubmed: 20603496
Tree Physiol. 2012 Oct;32(10):1179-82
pubmed: 23077117
Funct Plant Biol. 2009 Mar;36(3):199-213
pubmed: 32688639
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):11-7
pubmed: 22960000
Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):344-8
pubmed: 25788097
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Oct;29(10):1881-9
pubmed: 16930314
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jun;31(6):738-51
pubmed: 18208514
Science. 1984 Jul 13;225(4658):129-38
pubmed: 17837908
New Phytol. 2016 Mar;209(4):1338-40
pubmed: 26840248
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Nov;39(11):2414-2427
pubmed: 27391079
Funct Plant Biol. 2007 Mar;34(2):83-94
pubmed: 32689335
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1974 Mar 29;11(1):41-52
pubmed: 4832051
Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Apr;38(4):629-37
pubmed: 25224884
Tree Physiol. 2014 Aug;34(8):796-818
pubmed: 24907466
Oecologia. 2000 Nov;125(3):350-357
pubmed: 28547329
Tree Physiol. 2012 Apr;32(4):490-503
pubmed: 22440882
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 May 27;363(1498):1811-7
pubmed: 18267901
New Phytol. 2009;181(3):553-62
pubmed: 19154318
Oecologia. 2005 Nov;146(1):1-12
pubmed: 16012820
Oecologia. 2004 Feb;138(3):426-35
pubmed: 14666420
Plant Physiol. 1988 Dec;88(4):1418-24
pubmed: 16666476
Oecologia. 1999 Dec;121(4):467-477
pubmed: 28308356
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Apr;36(4):745-56
pubmed: 22882584
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):91-4
pubmed: 26333467
Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1344-7
pubmed: 19265020
Tree Physiol. 2012 Oct;32(10):1183-98
pubmed: 22989739
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 1;108(5):1981-6
pubmed: 21245322
Tree Physiol. 2005 Feb;25(2):129-46
pubmed: 15574395
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 26;103(39):14294-7
pubmed: 16984996
Trees (Berl West). 2017;31(6):1999-2009
pubmed: 32009742
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 May;39(5):1087-102
pubmed: 26715126
Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):441-54
pubmed: 18224341
Plant Cell Environ. 2012 Jul;35(7):1221-31
pubmed: 22292425
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):988-93
pubmed: 21764754
Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):1243092
pubmed: 24136971
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Apr;36(4):733-5
pubmed: 23387473
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):11-8
pubmed: 17210909
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):16957-62
pubmed: 23027960
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Jul;36(7):1239-41
pubmed: 23421713
New Phytol. 2014 May;202(3):772-783
pubmed: 24602089
Oecologia. 2005 Sep;145(3):454-61
pubmed: 16025354