The effect of multimodal information on children's numerical judgments.

Cognitive development Comparative cognition Intersensory redundancy Multisensory integration Multisensory processes Numerical cognition

Journal

Journal of experimental child psychology
ISSN: 1096-0457
Titre abrégé: J Exp Child Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985128R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 04 05 2018
revised: 04 01 2019
accepted: 05 01 2019
pubmed: 5 3 2019
medline: 28 7 2020
entrez: 5 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although much research suggests that adults, infants, and nonhuman primates process number (among other properties) across distinct modalities, limited studies have explored children's abilities to integrate multisensory information when making judgments about number. In the current study, 3- to 6-year-old children performed numerical matching or numerical discrimination tasks in which numerical information was presented either unimodally (visual only), cross-modally (comparing audio with visual), or bimodally (simultaneously presenting audio and visual input). In three experiments, we investigated children's multimodal numerical processing across distinct task demands and difficulty levels. In contrast to previous work, results indicate that even the youngest children (3 and 4 years) performed above chance across all three modality presentations. In addition, the current study contributes two other novel findings, namely that (a) children exhibit a cross-modal disadvantage when numerical comparisons are easy and that (b) accuracy on bimodal trial types led to even more accurate numerical judgments under more difficult circumstances, particularly for the youngest participants and when precise numerical matching was required. Importantly, findings from this study extend the literature on children's numerical cross-modal abilities to reveal that, like their adult counterparts, children readily track and compare visual and auditory numerical information, although their abilities to do so are not perfect and are affected by task demands and trial difficulty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30831382
pii: S0022-0965(18)30267-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

166-186

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Tasha Posid (T)

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43212, USA. Electronic address: posid.1@osu.edu.

Sara Cordes (S)

Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH