The effect of multimodal information on children's numerical judgments.
Cognitive development
Comparative cognition
Intersensory redundancy
Multisensory integration
Multisensory processes
Numerical cognition
Journal
Journal of experimental child psychology
ISSN: 1096-0457
Titre abrégé: J Exp Child Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985128R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
04
05
2018
revised:
04
01
2019
accepted:
05
01
2019
pubmed:
5
3
2019
medline:
28
7
2020
entrez:
5
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although much research suggests that adults, infants, and nonhuman primates process number (among other properties) across distinct modalities, limited studies have explored children's abilities to integrate multisensory information when making judgments about number. In the current study, 3- to 6-year-old children performed numerical matching or numerical discrimination tasks in which numerical information was presented either unimodally (visual only), cross-modally (comparing audio with visual), or bimodally (simultaneously presenting audio and visual input). In three experiments, we investigated children's multimodal numerical processing across distinct task demands and difficulty levels. In contrast to previous work, results indicate that even the youngest children (3 and 4 years) performed above chance across all three modality presentations. In addition, the current study contributes two other novel findings, namely that (a) children exhibit a cross-modal disadvantage when numerical comparisons are easy and that (b) accuracy on bimodal trial types led to even more accurate numerical judgments under more difficult circumstances, particularly for the youngest participants and when precise numerical matching was required. Importantly, findings from this study extend the literature on children's numerical cross-modal abilities to reveal that, like their adult counterparts, children readily track and compare visual and auditory numerical information, although their abilities to do so are not perfect and are affected by task demands and trial difficulty.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30831382
pii: S0022-0965(18)30267-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
166-186Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.