Pre-Operative Versus Post-Operative Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases-Volumetric and Dosimetric Impact of Treatment Sequence and Margin Concept.
metastases
neurosurgery
radiation therapy
radiosurgery
radiotherapy
stereotactic
tumor
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2019
01 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
14
01
2019
revised:
18
02
2019
accepted:
25
02
2019
entrez:
6
3
2019
pubmed:
6
3
2019
medline:
6
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pre-operative radiosurgery (SRS) preceding the resection of brain metastases promises to circumvent limitations of post-operative cavity SRS. It minimizes uncertainties regarding delineation and safety margins and could reduce dose exposure of the healthy brain (HB). We performed a systematic treatment plan comparison on 24 patients who received post-operative radiosurgery of the resection cavity at our institution. Comparative treatment plans were calculated for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (7 × 5 Gray (Gy)) in a hypothetical pre-operative (pre-op) and two post-operative scenarios, either with (extended field, post-op-E) or without the surgical tract (involved field, post-op-I). Detailed volumetric comparison of the resulting target volumes was performed, as well as dosimetric comparison focusing on targets and the HB. The resection cavity was significantly smaller and different in morphology from the pre-operative lesion, yielding a low Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 53% (
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pre-operative radiosurgery (SRS) preceding the resection of brain metastases promises to circumvent limitations of post-operative cavity SRS. It minimizes uncertainties regarding delineation and safety margins and could reduce dose exposure of the healthy brain (HB).
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a systematic treatment plan comparison on 24 patients who received post-operative radiosurgery of the resection cavity at our institution. Comparative treatment plans were calculated for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (7 × 5 Gray (Gy)) in a hypothetical pre-operative (pre-op) and two post-operative scenarios, either with (extended field, post-op-E) or without the surgical tract (involved field, post-op-I). Detailed volumetric comparison of the resulting target volumes was performed, as well as dosimetric comparison focusing on targets and the HB.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The resection cavity was significantly smaller and different in morphology from the pre-operative lesion, yielding a low Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 53% (
Identifiants
pubmed: 30832257
pii: cancers11030294
doi: 10.3390/cancers11030294
pmc: PMC6468393
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Neurosurg. 2000 Dec;93 Suppl 3:219-22
pubmed: 11143252
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):187-93
pubmed: 17881139
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:194-201
pubmed: 18503356
Med Phys. 2009 Aug;36(8):3381-4
pubmed: 19746770
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 15;77(4):996-1001
pubmed: 19783374
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S3-9
pubmed: 20171515
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 May 15;21(1):109-22
pubmed: 2032882
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 10;29(2):134-41
pubmed: 21041710
Radiat Oncol. 2011 May 15;6:48
pubmed: 21575163
Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5863-72
pubmed: 22047350
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):943-8
pubmed: 22494581
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e61-6
pubmed: 22516387
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):336-42
pubmed: 22652105
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071718
pubmed: 23822422
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Sep;189(9):765-70
pubmed: 23934329
N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 22;322(8):494-500
pubmed: 2405271
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 15;87(4):713-8
pubmed: 24054875
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Dec;109(3):448-51
pubmed: 24231243
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jan 1;88(1):130-6
pubmed: 24331659
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr;11(4):203-22
pubmed: 24569448
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):899-906
pubmed: 24606851
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):387-95
pubmed: 24621620
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 May-Jun;38(3):457-60
pubmed: 24681852
J Neurooncol. 2014 Oct;120(1):163-9
pubmed: 25048529
J Neurooncol. 2014 Dec;120(3):657-63
pubmed: 25189789
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121 Suppl:75-83
pubmed: 25434940
J Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;123(2):373-86
pubmed: 25978710
Neurosurgery. 2016 Aug;79(2):279-85
pubmed: 26528673
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):537-43
pubmed: 26867883
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Jun;192(6):368-76
pubmed: 26964777
J Neurooncol. 2017 Feb;131(3):611-618
pubmed: 28000105
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1040-1048
pubmed: 28687375
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1049-1060
pubmed: 28687377
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):436-442
pubmed: 29157748
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):13
pubmed: 29378610
Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2319-2327
pubmed: 29696815
J Neurooncol. 2018 Sep;139(2):449-454
pubmed: 29749569
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):19-29
pubmed: 29771381
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Dec;194(12):1163-1170
pubmed: 30218137
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):159-165
pubmed: 30288936
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 19;64(1):01TR01
pubmed: 30523903
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jul 1;29(4):711-7
pubmed: 8040016
Cancer. 1996 Oct 1;78(7):1470-6
pubmed: 8839553
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Aug;17(4):343-6
pubmed: 8889347
JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1485-9
pubmed: 9809728