Alternative Ultrasound-Assisted Method for the Extraction of the Bioactive Compounds Present in Myrtle (
Box–Behnken design
Myrtus communis L.
anthocyanins
bioactive compounds
myrtle
phenolic compounds
ultrasound-assisted extraction
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Mar 2019
02 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
05
02
2019
revised:
26
02
2019
accepted:
26
02
2019
entrez:
6
3
2019
pubmed:
6
3
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The bioactive compounds in myrtle berries, such as phenolic compounds and anthocyanins, have shown a potentially positive effect on human health. Efficient extraction methods are to be used to obtain maximum amounts of such beneficial compounds from myrtle. For that reason, this study evaluates the effectiveness of a rapid ultrasound-assisted method (UAE) to extract anthocyanins and phenolic compounds from myrtle berries. The influence of solvent composition, as well as pH, temperature, ultrasound amplitude, cycle and solvent-sample ratio on the total phenolic compounds and anthocyanins content in the extracts obtained were evaluated. The response variables were optimized by means of a Box-Behnken design. It was found that the double interaction of the methanol composition and the cycle, the interaction between methanol composition and temperature, and the interaction between the cycle and solvent-sample ratio were the most influential variables on the extraction of total phenolic compounds (92.8% methanol in water, 0.2 s of cycle, 60 °C and 10:0.5 mL:g). The methanol composition and the interaction between methanol composition and pH were the most influential variables on the extraction of anthocyanins (74.1% methanol in water at pH 7). The methods that have been developed presented high repeatability and intermediate precision (RSD < 5%) and the bioactive compounds show a high recovery with short extraction times. Both methods were used to analyze the composition of the bioactive compounds in myrtle berries collected from different locations in the province of Cadiz (Spain). The results obtained by UAE were compared to those achieved in a previous study where microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) methods were employed. Similar extraction yields were obtained for phenolic compounds and anthocyanins by MAE and UAE under optimal conditions. However, UAE presents the advantage of using milder conditions for the extraction of anthocyanins from myrtle, which makes of this a more suitable method for the extraction of these degradable compounds.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30832328
pii: molecules24050882
doi: 10.3390/molecules24050882
pmc: PMC6429515
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthocyanins
0
Antioxidants
0
Phenols
0
Plant Extracts
0
Solvents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Universidad de Cádiz
ID : Project OT2017/032
Références
Eur J Nutr. 2006 Feb;45(1):7-18
pubmed: 15834757
Ultrason Sonochem. 2006 Apr;13(3):195-9
pubmed: 16403480
Anal Chim Acta. 2007 Aug 6;597(2):179-86
pubmed: 17683728
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Jun 10;57(11):4988-94
pubmed: 19405527
Molecules. 2009 Aug 20;14(8):3094-105
pubmed: 19701146
Ultrason Sonochem. 2010 Mar;17(3):598-604
pubmed: 20015673
Food Chem Toxicol. 2010 May;48(5):1362-70
pubmed: 20211674
Chem Biodivers. 2011 Feb;8(2):300-10
pubmed: 21337502
Anal Chim Acta. 2011 Oct 3;703(1):8-18
pubmed: 21843670
Anal Chim Acta. 2012 Jun 30;732:100-4
pubmed: 22688040
Carbohydr Polym. 2013 Jan 30;92(1):604-11
pubmed: 23218342
Carbohydr Polym. 2014 Jan 30;101:379-85
pubmed: 24299786
Food Chem. 2015 Jan 1;166:585-95
pubmed: 25053097
Food Chem. 2011 Jun 15;126(4):1700-7
pubmed: 25213947
Food Chem. 2016 Jan 1;190:80-89
pubmed: 26212944
Food Chem. 2016 Apr 15;197 Pt B:1153-9
pubmed: 26675852
Food Chem. 2016 Sep 1;206:156-66
pubmed: 27041311
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Mar;97(4):1116-1123
pubmed: 27282949
J Mass Spectrom. 2016 Sep;51(9):704-15
pubmed: 27416492
Phytochem Anal. 2016 Sep;27(5):249-56
pubmed: 27438776
Food Chem. 2017 Mar 15;219:23-32
pubmed: 27765221
Molecules. 2017 Apr 15;22(4):
pubmed: 28420146
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2017 Jun;72(2):205-210
pubmed: 28447255
Food Chem. 2017 Sep 15;231:1-10
pubmed: 28449984
Food Chem. 2018 Jan 15;239:217-224
pubmed: 28873562
J Food Sci Technol. 2017 Dec;54(13):4362-4369
pubmed: 29184242
Food Res Int. 2018 Apr;106:291-303
pubmed: 29579930
Molecules. 2018 Jul 11;23(7):null
pubmed: 29997308
Food Chem. 2019 Feb 15;274:933-941
pubmed: 30373030
Molecules. 2018 Nov 16;23(11):null
pubmed: 30453481
Food Chem. 2011 Nov 15;129(2):570-576
pubmed: 30634269