Control of a Humanoid NAO Robot by an Adaptive Bioinspired Cerebellar Module in 3D Motion Tasks.
Journal
Computational intelligence and neuroscience
ISSN: 1687-5273
Titre abrégé: Comput Intell Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101279357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
10
2018
accepted:
27
12
2018
entrez:
6
3
2019
pubmed:
6
3
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A bioinspired adaptive model, developed by means of a spiking neural network made of thousands of artificial neurons, has been leveraged to control a humanoid NAO robot in real time. The learning properties of the system have been challenged in a classic cerebellum-driven paradigm, a perturbed upper limb reaching protocol. The neurophysiological principles used to develop the model succeeded in driving an adaptive motor control protocol with baseline, acquisition, and extinction phases. The spiking neural network model showed learning behaviours similar to the ones experimentally measured with human subjects in the same task in the acquisition phase, while resorted to other strategies in the extinction phase. The model processed in real-time external inputs, encoded as spikes, and the generated spiking activity of its output neurons was decoded, in order to provide the proper correction on the motor actuators. Three bidirectional long-term plasticity rules have been embedded for different connections and with different time scales. The plasticities shaped the firing activity of the output layer neurons of the network. In the perturbed upper limb reaching protocol, the neurorobot successfully learned how to compensate for the external perturbation generating an appropriate correction. Therefore, the spiking cerebellar model was able to reproduce in the robotic platform how biological systems deal with external sources of error, in both ideal and real (noisy) environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30833964
doi: 10.1155/2019/4862157
pmc: PMC6369512
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4862157Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1205-11
pubmed: 11127839
Biol Cybern. 2001 Mar;84(3):183-92
pubmed: 11252636
J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 1;21(11):4081-9
pubmed: 11356896
Neuroscientist. 2001 Apr;7(2):123-35
pubmed: 11496923
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):31-37
pubmed: 11849613
J Comp Neurol. 1958 Feb;109(1):1-33
pubmed: 13563670
Behav Neurosci. 1992 Aug;106(4):666-81
pubmed: 1503659
Neural Comput. 2006 Dec;18(12):2959-93
pubmed: 17052155
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):54-62
pubmed: 17507504
J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 17;27(42):11263-70
pubmed: 17942720
Front Neuroinform. 2008 Nov 18;2:5
pubmed: 19115011
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1961-71
pubmed: 19176608
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):60-7
pubmed: 19695273
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:89-108
pubmed: 20367317
Neuron. 2010 Aug 26;67(4):618-28
pubmed: 20797538
Front Comput Neurosci. 2010 Nov 23;4:141
pubmed: 21151370
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Sep 1;2(9):338-47
pubmed: 21227230
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):134-47
pubmed: 21975446
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Sep;13(9):619-35
pubmed: 22895474
Front Neural Circuits. 2013 Oct 09;7:159
pubmed: 24130518
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112265
pubmed: 25390365
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;9:24
pubmed: 25762922
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jan;63(1):210-9
pubmed: 26441441
Front Cell Neurosci. 2016 Jul 08;10:176
pubmed: 27458345
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2017 Nov.;28(11):2748-2762
pubmed: 27608482
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;37(8):1997-2009
pubmed: 28077726
PLoS Biol. 2018 Aug 1;16(8):e2004344
pubmed: 30067764
J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(2):437-70
pubmed: 5784296
Novartis Found Symp. 1998;218:291-304; discussion 304-7
pubmed: 9949827