Evaluation of a Rapid Syphilis Test in an Emergency Department Setting in Detroit, Michigan.
Adolescent
Adult
Agglutination Tests
Antibodies, Bacterial
/ blood
Emergency Service, Hospital
Humans
Male
Michigan
/ epidemiology
Point-of-Care Testing
Reagins
/ blood
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Syphilis
/ diagnosis
Syphilis Serodiagnosis
Time Factors
Treponema pallidum
/ immunology
Young Adult
Journal
Sexually transmitted diseases
ISSN: 1537-4521
Titre abrégé: Sex Transm Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7705941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
19
5
2020
entrez:
7
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Syphilis transmission can be prevented by prompt diagnosis and treatment of primary and secondary infection. We evaluated the performance of a point-of-care rapid syphilis treponemal (RST) test in an emergency department (ED) setting. Between June 2015 and April 2016, men aged 18 to 34 years seeking services in a Detroit ED, and with no history of syphilis, were screened for syphilis with the RST test, rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA). A positive reference standard was both a reactive RPR and a reactive TP-PA. We compared test results in self-reported men who have sex with men (MSM) to non-MSM. Among 965 participants, 10.9% of RST tests were reactive in MSM and only 1.5% in non-MSM (P < 0.001). Sensitivity of the RST test was 76.9% and specificity was 99.0% (positive predictive value, 50.0%) compared with the positive reference standard. Three discordant specimens found negative with the RST test but positive with the reference standard had an RPR titer of 1:1, compared with 10 specimens with concordant positive results that had a median RPR titer of 1:16. The RST sensitivity was 50.0% (positive predictive value, 68.4%) compared to the TP-PA test alone. Among men seeking care in an ED, the RST detected 76.9% of participants with a reactive RPR and TP-PA. The RST test detected all of the participants with an RPR titer ≥1:2 but less than 20% of participants with a positive TP-PA and negative RPR. The RST test was useful to detect a high proportion of participants with an active syphilis in an urban ED.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Syphilis transmission can be prevented by prompt diagnosis and treatment of primary and secondary infection. We evaluated the performance of a point-of-care rapid syphilis treponemal (RST) test in an emergency department (ED) setting.
METHODS
Between June 2015 and April 2016, men aged 18 to 34 years seeking services in a Detroit ED, and with no history of syphilis, were screened for syphilis with the RST test, rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA). A positive reference standard was both a reactive RPR and a reactive TP-PA. We compared test results in self-reported men who have sex with men (MSM) to non-MSM.
RESULTS
Among 965 participants, 10.9% of RST tests were reactive in MSM and only 1.5% in non-MSM (P < 0.001). Sensitivity of the RST test was 76.9% and specificity was 99.0% (positive predictive value, 50.0%) compared with the positive reference standard. Three discordant specimens found negative with the RST test but positive with the reference standard had an RPR titer of 1:1, compared with 10 specimens with concordant positive results that had a median RPR titer of 1:16. The RST sensitivity was 50.0% (positive predictive value, 68.4%) compared to the TP-PA test alone. Among men seeking care in an ED, the RST detected 76.9% of participants with a reactive RPR and TP-PA.
CONCLUSIONS
The RST test detected all of the participants with an RPR titer ≥1:2 but less than 20% of participants with a positive TP-PA and negative RPR. The RST test was useful to detect a high proportion of participants with an active syphilis in an urban ED.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30839394
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000993
pmc: PMC6571174
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Bacterial
0
Reagins
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
429-433Références
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Jan;43(1):65-6
pubmed: 26651000
Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Jul;4(7):456-66
pubmed: 15219556
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jun;82(6):439-46
pubmed: 15356937
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54695
pubmed: 23468842
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Mar;43(3):201-3
pubmed: 26859809
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Feb 11;60(5):133-7
pubmed: 21307823
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Oct 28;65(42):1174-1175
pubmed: 27787496
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137
pubmed: 26042815
J Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;204(9):1295-6
pubmed: 21921204
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jan;8(1):1-21
pubmed: 7704889
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 5;68(6):913-918
pubmed: 29986091