Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology over two decades.


Journal

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 1473-5687
Titre abrégé: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9000874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 7 3 2019
medline: 10 9 2020
entrez: 7 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been rising in the overall population as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the incidence of CDI in IBD may be changing owing to alterations in medical therapies. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of CDI in IBD over the past two decades and compare risk factors, disease characteristics and outcomes between IBD and non-IBD patients. In this retrospective case-control study, the incidence of CDI in IBD was followed for 18 years. The electronic database of our centre was reviewed for all stool samples received from patients admitted to gastroenterology wards or visiting the outpatient clinic. Diagnosis of CDI was based on diagnostic criteria that evolved throughout the years. IBD patients (n=44) with CDI were found to be younger (P=0.0001), have less cardiovascular comorbidity (P=0.023), fewer prior hospitalizations (P=0.009) and fewer prior antibiotic use (P=0.005). More IBD patients were on biologic therapy (P=0.0001) or steroids (P=0.001) but less likely taking proton pump inhibitors (P=0.001). The number of stool testing per year increased as well as the median number of positive stool samples for CDI (2% in 2000-2008 to 3% in 2009-2017, P=0.032). Pseudomembranes were only seen in non-IBD patients (28%, P=0.048). There was no difference in the choice of antibiotics between IBD and non-IBD patients [metronidazole (36 vs. 51%) and vancomycin (36 vs. 26%), P=0.090 and 0.190]. The 1-year mortality rate was lower in IBD patients compared with non-IBD patients (0 vs. 32%, P=0.0001). In the past two decades, the incidence of CDI in IBD and non-IBD patients has increased. However, the overall outcome of CDI in IBD patients was favourable compared with non-IBD patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been rising in the overall population as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the incidence of CDI in IBD may be changing owing to alterations in medical therapies.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of CDI in IBD over the past two decades and compare risk factors, disease characteristics and outcomes between IBD and non-IBD patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
In this retrospective case-control study, the incidence of CDI in IBD was followed for 18 years. The electronic database of our centre was reviewed for all stool samples received from patients admitted to gastroenterology wards or visiting the outpatient clinic. Diagnosis of CDI was based on diagnostic criteria that evolved throughout the years.
RESULTS RESULTS
IBD patients (n=44) with CDI were found to be younger (P=0.0001), have less cardiovascular comorbidity (P=0.023), fewer prior hospitalizations (P=0.009) and fewer prior antibiotic use (P=0.005). More IBD patients were on biologic therapy (P=0.0001) or steroids (P=0.001) but less likely taking proton pump inhibitors (P=0.001). The number of stool testing per year increased as well as the median number of positive stool samples for CDI (2% in 2000-2008 to 3% in 2009-2017, P=0.032). Pseudomembranes were only seen in non-IBD patients (28%, P=0.048). There was no difference in the choice of antibiotics between IBD and non-IBD patients [metronidazole (36 vs. 51%) and vancomycin (36 vs. 26%), P=0.090 and 0.190]. The 1-year mortality rate was lower in IBD patients compared with non-IBD patients (0 vs. 32%, P=0.0001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In the past two decades, the incidence of CDI in IBD and non-IBD patients has increased. However, the overall outcome of CDI in IBD patients was favourable compared with non-IBD patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30839436
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001394
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

668-673

Auteurs

Annick Moens (A)

Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven.

Bram Verstockt (B)

Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven.

Kathleen Machiels (K)

Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven.

Peter Bossuyt (P)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.

Ann Verdonck (A)

Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven.

Katrien Lagrou (K)

Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven.

Gert van Assche (G)

Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven.

Séverine Vermeire (S)

Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven.

Marc Ferrante (M)

Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH