Cup alignment in total hip arthroplasty using the muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach-comparison between lateral and supine positions.
Cup alignment
Lateral position
Muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach
Supine position
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
International orthopaedics
ISSN: 1432-5195
Titre abrégé: Int Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7705431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
16
10
2018
accepted:
18
02
2019
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
7
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study aimed to compare the cup alignment outliers in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the same surgical approach with the patient in the supine position versus the lateral position. THA using the muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach was performed in 142 consecutive hips. THA was performed with the patient in the lateral position in 84 hips (lateral group) and in the supine position in 58 hips (supine group). The cup alignment was aimed at 40° inclination and 20° anteversion by referring to the mechanical alignment guide. Cup alignment and outliers (10° > aimed alignment) were assessed using post-operative 3D-CT. The absolute error from the aimed inclination was 6.0 ± 4.7° in the supine group and 4.2 ± 3.6° in the lateral group (p = 0.01). The absolute error from the aimed anteversion was 4.1 ± 3.2° in the supine group and 5.1 ± 3.7° in the lateral group (p = 0.12). The supine group showed a higher rate of outliers than the lateral group for the cup inclination (22% vs 5%; p < 0.01). Inclination and BMI were positively correlated in the spine position group (p < 0.01, R = 0.48), but were not correlated in the lateral position group. THA performed with the patient in the supine position has a higher risk of outliers of cup alignment compared with the lateral position, even when the same surgical approach is used. BMI affected the cup inclination in the supine position.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30840097
doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04316-y
pii: 10.1007/s00264-019-04316-y
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2477-2483Références
Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):769-775
pubmed: 28782077
Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1807-1814
pubmed: 30135983
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7):946-52
pubmed: 17920464
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2362-70
pubmed: 19277802
Mod Rheumatol. 2016;26(3):435-40
pubmed: 26375057
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Mar;75(2):228-32
pubmed: 8444942
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 18;5(1):784
pubmed: 27386270
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Apr;17(3):282-8
pubmed: 11938502
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Jun;75(3):252-60
pubmed: 15260415
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jun;87(6):762-9
pubmed: 15911655
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Sep;129(9):1151-6
pubmed: 18427818
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1561-4
pubmed: 25913560
Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10
pubmed: 9463853
Int Orthop. 2007 Aug;31 Suppl 1:S7-11
pubmed: 17668206
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):67-9
pubmed: 24187356
Int Orthop. 2017 Dec;41(12):2487-2493
pubmed: 28567577
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):112-8
pubmed: 18830670
J Arthroplasty. 1998 Aug;13(5):530-4
pubmed: 9726318
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):698-704
pubmed: 18555653
Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):731-738
pubmed: 27277948
Eur J Radiol. 2006 May;58(2):294-300
pubmed: 16289687
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6):986-9
pubmed: 19837559
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3659-3664
pubmed: 28712802
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):248-55
pubmed: 15577495
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571