Symptomatic and Functional Outcomes and Early Prediction of Response to Escitalopram Monotherapy and Sequential Adjunctive Aripiprazole Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A CAN-BIND-1 Report.
Adolescent
Adult
Antidepressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
/ therapeutic use
Aripiprazole
/ therapeutic use
Citalopram
/ therapeutic use
Depressive Disorder, Major
/ drug therapy
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outpatients
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
The Journal of clinical psychiatry
ISSN: 1555-2101
Titre abrégé: J Clin Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7801243
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 02 2019
05 02 2019
Historique:
received:
21
02
2018
accepted:
15
08
2018
entrez:
7
3
2019
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To report the symptomatic and functional outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) during a 2-phase treatment trial and to estimate the value of early improvement after 2 weeks in predicting clinical response to escitalopram and subsequently to adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole. Participants with MDD (N = 211) identified with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and confirmed with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview were recruited from 6 outpatient centers across Canada (August 2013 through December 2016) and treated with open-label escitalopram (10-20 mg) for 8 weeks (Phase 1). Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated using the MADRS, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Rated (QIDS-SR), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale (LEAPS). Participants were evaluated at 8 and 16 weeks for clinical and functional response and remission. Phase 1 responders continued escitalopram while nonresponders received adjunctive aripiprazole (2-10 mg) for a further 8 weeks (Phase 2). After Phase 1, MADRS response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) and remission (score ≤ 10) were, respectively, 47% and 31%, and SDS response (score ≤ 12) and remission (score ≤ 6) were, respectively, 53% and 24%. Response to escitalopram was maintained in 91% of participants at week 16, while 61% of the adjunctive aripiprazole group achieved MADRS response during Phase 2. Response and remission rates with the QIDS-SR were lower than with the MADRS. The LEAPS demonstrated significant occupational improvement (P < .05). Early symptomatic improvement predicted outcomes with modest accuracy. This study demonstrates comparable symptomatic and functional outcomes to those of other large practical-design studies. There was a high response rate with the adjunctive use of aripiprazole in escitalopram nonresponders. Given the limited value of early clinical improvement to predict outcome, integration of clinical and biological markers deserves further exploration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01655706.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30840787
doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12202
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Antidepressive Agents
0
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
0
Citalopram
0DHU5B8D6V
Aripiprazole
82VFR53I78
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01655706']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© Copyright 2019 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.