A review of spline function procedures in R.
Functional form of continuous covariates
Multivariable modelling
Journal
BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 03 2019
06 03 2019
Historique:
received:
06
07
2018
accepted:
18
01
2019
entrez:
8
3
2019
pubmed:
8
3
2019
medline:
25
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With progress on both the theoretical and the computational fronts the use of spline modelling has become an established tool in statistical regression analysis. An important issue in spline modelling is the availability of user friendly, well documented software packages. Following the idea of the STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies initiative to provide users with guidance documents on the application of statistical methods in observational research, the aim of this article is to provide an overview of the most widely used spline-based techniques and their implementation in R. In this work, we focus on the R Language for Statistical Computing which has become a hugely popular statistics software. We identified a set of packages that include functions for spline modelling within a regression framework. Using simulated and real data we provide an introduction to spline modelling and an overview of the most popular spline functions. We present a series of simple scenarios of univariate data, where different basis functions are used to identify the correct functional form of an independent variable. Even in simple data, using routines from different packages would lead to different results. This work illustrate challenges that an analyst faces when working with data. Most differences can be attributed to the choice of hyper-parameters rather than the basis used. In fact an experienced user will know how to obtain a reasonable outcome, regardless of the type of spline used. However, many analysts do not have sufficient knowledge to use these powerful tools adequately and will need more guidance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
With progress on both the theoretical and the computational fronts the use of spline modelling has become an established tool in statistical regression analysis. An important issue in spline modelling is the availability of user friendly, well documented software packages. Following the idea of the STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies initiative to provide users with guidance documents on the application of statistical methods in observational research, the aim of this article is to provide an overview of the most widely used spline-based techniques and their implementation in R.
METHODS
In this work, we focus on the R Language for Statistical Computing which has become a hugely popular statistics software. We identified a set of packages that include functions for spline modelling within a regression framework. Using simulated and real data we provide an introduction to spline modelling and an overview of the most popular spline functions.
RESULTS
We present a series of simple scenarios of univariate data, where different basis functions are used to identify the correct functional form of an independent variable. Even in simple data, using routines from different packages would lead to different results.
CONCLUSIONS
This work illustrate challenges that an analyst faces when working with data. Most differences can be attributed to the choice of hyper-parameters rather than the basis used. In fact an experienced user will know how to obtain a reasonable outcome, regardless of the type of spline used. However, many analysts do not have sufficient knowledge to use these powerful tools adequately and will need more guidance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30841848
doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0666-3
pii: 10.1186/s12874-019-0666-3
pmc: PMC6402144
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
46Références
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5512-28
pubmed: 18058845
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Aug 1;156(3):193-203
pubmed: 12142253
Stat Methods Med Res. 1995 Sep;4(3):187-96
pubmed: 8548102
Stat Med. 2014 Dec 30;33(30):5413-32
pubmed: 25074480
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Nov;21(6):1177-86
pubmed: 22023685
Biom J. 2015 Jul;57(4):531-55
pubmed: 25501529
Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1305-19
pubmed: 1518992