"Hit the missing stimulus". A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study to localize the generators of endogenous ERPs in an omitted target paradigm.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 03 2019
06 03 2019
Historique:
received:
07
08
2018
accepted:
11
01
2019
entrez:
8
3
2019
pubmed:
8
3
2019
medline:
22
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) occurring independently from any stimulus are purely endogenous (emitted potentials) and their neural generators can be unequivocally linked with cognitive processes. In the present study, the subjects performed two similar visual counting tasks: a standard two-stimulus oddball, and an omitted-target oddball task, characterized by the physical absence of the target stimulus. Our investigation aimed at localizing the neural sources of the scalp-recorded endogenous/emitted ERPs. To optimize the source localization, the high temporal resolution of electrophysiology was combined with the fine spatial information provided by the simultaneous recording of functional magnetic resonance (fMRI). Both tasks identified two endogenous ERP components in the 300 to 520 ms interval. An earlier component, pP2, showed a bilateral generator in the anterior Insula. A later P3 component (P3b) was generated bilaterally in the temporal-parietal junction, the premotor and motor area and the anterior intraparietal sulcus (this latter one only in the standard oddball). Anticipatory slow waves (beginning 900 to 500 ms pre-stimulus), also of endogenous nature, were produced by the inferior and middle frontal gyrus and the supplementary and cingulate motor areas. Our protocol disentangled pre- from post-stimulus fMRI activations and provided original clues to the psychophysiological interpretation of emitted/endogenous ERPs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30842443
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39812-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-39812-z
pmc: PMC6403295
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3684Références
Sutton, S., Tueting, P., Zubin, J. & John, E. R. Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science 155, 1436–1439 (1967).
pubmed: 6018511
doi: 10.1126/science.155.3768.1436
O’Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M. & Kelly, S. P. A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans. Nature Neuroscience 15, 1729–1735 (2012).
pubmed: 23103963
doi: 10.1038/nn.3248
Picton, T. W. et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition. Psychophysiology 37, 127–152 (2000).
pubmed: 10731765
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720127
Duncan, C. C. et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300 and N400. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 1883–1908 (2009).
pubmed: 19796989
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045
Polich, J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 2128–2148 (2007).
pubmed: 17573239
pmcid: 2715154
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
Van Boxtel, G. J. M. & Böcker, K. B. E. Cortical measures of anticipation. J. Psychophysiol. 18, 61–76 (2004).
doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.18.23.61
Näätänen, R. et al. The mismatch negativity: an index of cognitive decline in neuropsychiatric and neurological diseases and in ageing. Brain 134, 3435–3453 (2011).
pubmed: 21624926
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr064
Salti, M. et al. Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts. eLife 4, e05652 (2015).
pmcid: 4467230
doi: 10.7554/eLife.05652
Sergent, C., Baillet, S. & Dehaene, S. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neurosci. 8, 1391–1400 (2005).
pubmed: 16158062
doi: 10.1038/nn1549
Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M. & Tononi, G. Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nature Rev. Neuroscience 17, 307–321 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.22
Donchin, E. & Coles, M. G. H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 357–374 (1988).
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00058027
Verleger, R. & Śmigasiewicz, K. Do rare stimuli evoke large P3s by being unexpected? A comparison of the oddball effects between standard-oddball and prediction-oddball tasks. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 12, 88–104 (2016).
pubmed: 27512527
pmcid: 4975594
doi: 10.5709/acp-0189-9
Fell, J. et al. Neural bases of cognitive ERPs: more than phase reset. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1595–1604 (2004).
pubmed: 15601521
doi: 10.1162/0898929042568514
Halgren, E., Marinkovic, K. & Chauvel, P. Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 106, 156–164 (1998).
pubmed: 9741777
doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00119-3
McCarthy, G., Wood, C. C., Williamson, P. D. & Spencer, D. D. Task-dependent field potentials in human hippocampal formation. J. Neurosci. 9, 4253–4268 (1989).
pubmed: 2593001
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-12-04253.1989
pmcid: 6569633
Smith, M. E. et al. The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 76, 235–248 (1990).
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90018-F
Knight, R. T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in humans. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 59, 9–20 (1984).
pubmed: 6198170
doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90016-9
Nishitani, N. et al. The role of hippocampus in auditory processing studied by event-related electric potentials and magnetic fields in epilepsy patients before and after temporal lobectomy. Brain 122, 687–707 (1999).
pubmed: 10219782
doi: 10.1093/brain/122.4.687
Bledowski, C., Prvulovic, D., Goebel, R., Zanella, F. E. & Linden, D. E. J. Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study. NeuroImage 22, 530–540 (2004a).
pubmed: 15193581
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.034
Clark, V. P., Fannon, S., Lai, S., Benson, R. & Bauer, L. Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 3133–3139 (2000).
pubmed: 10805707
doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.3133
Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K. R., Duty, T. L., Forster, B. B. & Liddle, P. F. Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 38, 133–142 (2001).
pubmed: 11321614
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3810133
Linden, D. E. J. et al. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cerebral Cortex 9, 815–823 (1999).
pubmed: 10601000
doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.8.815
McCarthy, G., Luby, M., Gore, J. & Goldman-Rakic, P. Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 1630–1634 (1997).
pubmed: 9084626
doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1630
Menon, V., Ford, J. M., Lim, K. O., Glover, G. H. & Pfefferbaum, A. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection. NeuroReport 8, 3029–3037 (1997).
pubmed: 9331910
doi: 10.1097/00001756-199709290-00007
Opitz, P., Mecklinger, A., von Cramon, D. Y. & Kruggel, F. Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. Psychophysiology 36, 142–147 (1999).
pubmed: 10098390
doi: 10.1017/S0048577299980848
Calhoun, V. D., Adali, T., Pearlson, G. D. & Kiehl, K. A. Neural chronometry of target detection: fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data. NeuroImage 30, 544–553 (2006).
pubmed: 16246587
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.060
Mantini, D., Corbetta, M., Perrucci, M. G., Romani, G. L. & Del Gratta, C. Large-scale brain networks account for sustained and transient activity during target detection. NeuroImage 44, 265–274 (2009).
pubmed: 18793734
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.019
Bénar, C. G. et al. Single-trial analysis of oddball-event-related potentials in simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 602–613 (2007).
pubmed: 17295312
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20289
Iannetti, G. D. et al. Simultaneous recording of laser-evoked brain potentials and continuous, high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 28, 708–719 (2005).
pubmed: 16112589
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.060
Liebenthal, E. et al. Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm. NeuroImage 19, 1395–1404 (2003).
pubmed: 12948697
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00228-3
Mulert, C. et al. Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: toward a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection. NeuroImage 22, 83–94 (2004).
pubmed: 15109999
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.051
Otzenberger, H., Gounot, D. & Foucher, J. R. P300 recordings during event-related fMRI: a feasibility study. Cogn. Brain Res. 23, 306–315 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.017
Rusiniak, M. et al. A modified oddball paradigm for investigations of neural correlates of attention: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI study. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phy. 26, 511–526 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s10334-013-0374-7
Bledowski, C. et al. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined Event-Related Potential and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. J. Neurosci. 24, 9353–9360 (2004b).
pubmed: 15496671
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1897-04.2004
pmcid: 6730097
Di Russo, F. et al. Spatiotemporal brain mapping during preparation, perception, and action. NeuroImage 126, 1–14 (2016).
pubmed: 26608247
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.036
Pitzalis, S., Strappini, F., De Gasperis, M., Bultrini, A. & Di Russo, F. Spatio-temporal brain mapping of motion-onset VEPs combined with fMRI and retinotopic maps. PlosOne 7, e35771 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035771
Gaillard, A. W. K. Problems and paradigms in ERP research. Biol. Psychol. 26, 91–109 (1988).
pubmed: 3061482
doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(88)90015-4
Chennu, S. et al. Silent expectations: Dynamic Causal Modeling of cortical prediction and attention to sounds that weren’t. J. Neurosci. 36, 8305–8316 (2016).
pubmed: 27511005
pmcid: 4978796
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1125-16.2016
Hernández, O. H. & Vogel-Sprott, M. OSP parameters and the cognitive component of reaction time to a missing stimulus: linking brain and behavior. Brain & Cogn. 71, 141–146 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.04.010
Jongsma, M. L. A. et al. Expectancy effects on omission evoked potentials in musicians and non-musicians. Psychophysiology 42, 191–201 (2005).
pubmed: 15787856
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00269.x
Klinke, R., Fruhstorfer, H. & Finkenzeller, P. Evoked responses as a function of external and stored information. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 25, 119–122 (1968).
pubmed: 4176523
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(68)90135-1
Perrault, N. & Picton, T. W. Event-related potentials recorded from the scalp and nasopharynx. II. N2, P3 and slow wave. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 59, 261–278 (1984).
pubmed: 6203716
doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90044-3
Picton, T. W. & Hillyard, S. A. Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 36, 191–199 (1974).
pubmed: 4129631
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(74)90156-4
Renault, B. & Lesèvre, N. Topographical study of the emitted potential obtained after the omission of an expected visual stimulus, In Multidiscipinary Perspectives in Event-related Brain Potential Research (ed. Otto, D.) 200–208 (U.S. Govt. Printing Office Washington, D.C., 1978).
Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G. & Friedman, D. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science 203, 1358–1361 (1979).
pubmed: 424760
doi: 10.1126/science.424760
Ruchkin, D. S., Sutton, S. & Tueting, P. Emitted and evoked P300 potentials and variation in stimulus probability. Psychophysiology 12, 591–595 (1975).
pubmed: 1181611
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb00052.x
Ruchkin, D. S. & Sutton, S. Emitted P300 potentials and temporal uncertainty. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 45, 268–277 (1978).
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90010-X
SanMiguel, I., Widmann, A., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. & Schröger, E. Hearing silences: human auditory processing relies on preactivation of sound-specific brain activity patterns. J. Neurosci. 33, 8633–8639 (2013).
pubmed: 23678108
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5821-12.2013
pmcid: 6618825
Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G. Jr. & Ritter, W. The scalp topography of potentials associated with missing visual or auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 40, 33–42 (1976).
pubmed: 55346
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(76)90177-2
Tarkka, I. M. & Stokic, D. S. Source localization of P300 from oddball, single stimulus and omitted stimulus paradigms. Brain Topogr. 2, 141–151 (1998).
doi: 10.1023/A:1022258606418
Wacongne, C. et al. Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 20754–20759 (2011).
pubmed: 22147913
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117807108
pmcid: 3251061
Weinberg, H., Walter, G. W. & Crow, H. J. Intracerebral events in humans related to real and imaginary stimuli. Electroenceph. clin, Neurophysiol. 29, 1–9 (1970).
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(70)90074-X
Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Reinikainen, K. & Näätänen, R. Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission. NeuroReport 8, 1971–1974 (1997).
pubmed: 9223087
doi: 10.1097/00001756-199705260-00035
Shibasaki, H. & Hallett, M. What is the Bereitschaftspotential. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 2341–2356 (2006).
pubmed: 16876476
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025
Di Russo, F. et al. Beyond the “Bereitschaftspotential”: Action preparation behind cognitive functions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 78, 57–81 (2017).
pubmed: 28445742
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.019
Berchicci, M., Spinelli, D. & Di Russo, F. New insights into old waves by matching stimulus- and response-locked ERPs on the same time-window. Biol. Psychol. 117, 202–215 (2016).
pubmed: 27086274
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.04.007
Sulpizio, V. et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in the transition from action preparation to execution. NeuroImage 148, 390–402 (2017).
pubmed: 28069542
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.009
Allen, P. J., Josephs, O. & Turner, R. A method for removing Imaging Artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage 12, 230–239 (2000).
pubmed: 10913328
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0599
Lehmann, D. & Skrandies, W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 48, 609–621 (1980).
pubmed: 6155251
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90419-8
Böcker, K. B. E. & Brunia, C. H. M. Van den Berg-Lenss, M.M.C. A spatio-temporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity SPN prior to feedback stimuli. Brain Topogr. 7, 71–88 (1994).
pubmed: 7803202
doi: 10.1007/BF01184839
Beckmann, C. F., Smith, S. & Jenkinson, M. General multi-level linear modelling for group analysis in fMRI. Neuroimage 20, 1052–1063 (2003).
pubmed: 14568475
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00435-X
Coull, J. T., Cheng, R.-K. & Meck, W. H. Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rev. 36, 3–25 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.113
Kinomura, S., Larsson, J., Gulyás, B. & Roland, P. E. Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science 271, 512–515 (1996).
pubmed: 8560267
doi: 10.1126/science.271.5248.512
Darriba, A. & Waszak, F. Predictions through evidence accumulation over time. Sci. Rep. 8, 494 (2018).
pubmed: 29323172
pmcid: 5765034
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18802-z
Perri, R. L. et al. Awareness of perception and sensory-motor integration: ERPs from the anterior insula. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 3577–3592 (2018b).
pubmed: 29978306
doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-1709-y
Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S. & Ungerleider, L. G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision-making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 96, 467–479 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nrn2374
Perri, R. L., Berchicci, M., Lucci, G., Spinelli, D. & Di Russo, F. Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation–perception–action cycle and error-detection. Neuroimage 113, 320–328 (2015a).
pubmed: 25812715
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.040
Perri, R. L., Spinelli, D. & Di Russo, F. Missing the target: the neural processing underlying the omission error. Brain Topogr. 30, 352–363 (2017).
pubmed: 28108852
doi: 10.1007/s10548-017-0545-3
Perri, R. L., Berchicci, M., Bianco, V., Spinelli, D. & Di Russo, F. Brain waves from an “isolated” cortex: Contribution of the anterior insula to cognitive functions. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 1343–1355 (2018a).
pubmed: 29124352
doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-1709-y
Augustine, J. R. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res. Rev. 22, 229–244 (1996).
pubmed: 8957561
doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(96)00011-2
Cauda, F. et al. Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. NeuroImage 551, 8–23 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.049
Uddin, L. Q., Nomi, J. S., Hébert-Seropian, B., Ghaziri, J. & Boucher, O. Structure and function of the human Insula. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 34, 300–306 (2017).
pubmed: 28644199
pmcid: 6032992
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000377
Craig, A. D. B. How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70 (2009).
doi: 10.1038/nrn2555
pubmed: 19096369
Fischer, D. B. et al. A human brain network derived from coma-causing brainstem lesions. Neurology 87, 1–8 (2016).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003404
Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A. & Galambos, R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 39, 131–143 (1975).
pubmed: 50210
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90003-6
Spencer, K. M., Dien, J. & Donchin, E. Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology 38, 343–358 (2001).
pubmed: 11347879
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3820343
Verleger, R., Baur, N., Metzner, M. F. & Śmigasiewicz, K. The hard oddball: effects of difficult response selection on stimulus-related P3 and on response-related negative potentials. Psychophysiology 51, 1089–1100 (2014).
pubmed: 24981371
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12262
Brázdil, M., Roman, R., Daniel, P. & Rektor, I. Intracerebral somatosensory event-related potentials: effect of response type (button pressing versus mental counting) on P3-like potentials within the human brain. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 1489–1496 (2003).
pubmed: 12888032
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00135-4
Crottaz-Herbette, S., Lau, K. M., Glover, G. H. & Menon, V. Hippocampal involvement in detection of deviant auditory and visual stimuli. Hippocampus 15, 132–139 (2005).
pubmed: 15390157
doi: 10.1002/hipo.20039
Heit, G., Smith, M. E. & Halgren, E. Neuronal activity in the human medial temporal lobe during recognition memory. Brain 113, 1093–1112 (1990).
pubmed: 2397384
doi: 10.1093/brain/113.4.1093
Halgren, E. et al. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 94, 229–250 (1995).
pubmed: 7537196
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)98475-N
Carter, C. S. et al. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280, 747–749 (1998).
pubmed: 9563953
doi: 10.1126/science.280.5364.747
Ragazzoni, A. et al. Clinical neurophysiology of prolonged disorders of consciousness: from diagnostic stimulation to therapeutic neuromodulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 1629–1646 (2017).
pubmed: 28728060
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.037
Curley, W. H., Forgacs, P. B., Voss, H. U., Conte, M. M. & Schiff, N. D. Characterization of EEG signals revealing covert cognition in the injured brain. Brain 141, 1404–1421 (2018).
pubmed: 29562312
doi: 10.1093/brain/awy070
pmcid: 5917770