Perspectives of Patients in Identifying Their Values-Based Health Priorities.
goals and goal setting
multimorbidity
older adults
patient priorities
preferences
Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
ISSN: 1532-5415
Titre abrégé: J Am Geriatr Soc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503062
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
05
12
2018
revised:
06
02
2019
accepted:
07
02
2019
pubmed:
8
3
2019
medline:
23
5
2020
entrez:
8
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient Health Priorities Identification (PHPI) is a values-based process in which trained facilitators assist older adults with multiple chronic conditions identify their health priorities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perceptions of PHPI. Qualitative study using thematic analysis. In-depth semistructured telephone and in-person interviews. Twenty-two older adults who participated in the PHPI process. Open-ended questions about patient perceptions of the PHPI process, perceived benefits of the process, enablers and barriers to PHPI, and recommendations for process enhancement. Patient interviews ranged from 9 to 63 minutes (median = 20 min; interquartile range = 15-26). The mean age was 80 years (standard deviation = 7.96), 64% were female, and all patients identified themselves as white. Of the sample, 73% reported no caregiver involvement in their healthcare; 36% lived alone. Most patients felt able to complete the PHPI process with ease. Perceived benefits included increased knowledge and insight into disease processes and treatment options, patient activation, and enhanced communication with family and clinicians. Patients identified several factors that were both enablers and barriers to PHPI including facilitator characteristics, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, social support, relationships between the patient and their primary care provider, and the changing health priorities of the patient. Recommendations for process enhancement included more frequent and flexible facilitator contacts, selection of patients for participation based on specific patient characteristics, clarification of process aims and expectations, involvement of family, written reminders of established health priorities, short duration between facilitation and primary care provider follow-up, and the inclusion of health-related tasks in facilitation visits. Patients found the PHPI process valuable in identifying actionable health priorities and healthcare goals leading to enhanced knowledge, activation, and communication regarding their treatment options and preferences. PHPI may be useful for aligning the healthcare that patients receive with their values-based priorities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30844080
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15850
pmc: PMC6612577
mid: NIHMS1017850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1379-1385Subventions
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : John A. Hartford Foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG021342
Pays : United States
Organisme : Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Pays : International
Organisme : Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety
Pays : International
Organisme : Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Yale University
ID : National Institute on Aging, National Institutes o
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The American Geriatrics Society.
Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):93-9
pubmed: 17890042
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1409-16
pubmed: 18662210
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Oct;56(10):1839-44
pubmed: 18771453
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1854-6
pubmed: 21949032
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Feb;60(2):332-7
pubmed: 22211768
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):3-5
pubmed: 22230824
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2012;3:39-49
pubmed: 23185121
JAMA. 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2503-4
pubmed: 24165826
Med Care. 2014 Mar;52 Suppl 3:S118-25
pubmed: 24561750
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):1-3
pubmed: 24809597
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 26;14:281
pubmed: 24969758
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 02;12:109
pubmed: 24989988
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Sep;62(9):1753-8
pubmed: 25146885
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1994-2003
pubmed: 25330167
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Mar;64(3):625-31
pubmed: 27000335
Clin Geriatr Med. 2016 May;32(2):261-75
pubmed: 27113145
J Aging Health. 2018 Jun;30(5):778-799
pubmed: 28553806
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 1;36(7):1258-1264
pubmed: 28679813
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):1031-1039
pubmed: 29512147
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):1872-1879
pubmed: 30281794