Biogeography of Soil Bacterial Networks along a Gradient of Cropping Intensity.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 03 2019
07 03 2019
Historique:
received:
20
11
2018
accepted:
13
02
2019
entrez:
9
3
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
30
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although land use drives soil bacterial diversity and community structure, little information about the bacterial interaction networks is available. Here, we investigated bacterial co-occurrence networks in soils under different types of land use (forests, grasslands, crops and vineyards) by sampling 1798 sites in the French Soil Quality Monitoring Network covering all of France. An increase in bacterial richness was observed from forests to vineyards, whereas network complexity respectively decreased from 16,430 links to 2,046. However, the ratio of positive to negative links within the bacterial networks ranged from 2.9 in forests to 5.5 in vineyards. Networks structure was centered on the most connected genera (called hub), which belonged to Bacteroidetes in forest and grassland soils, but to Actinobacteria in vineyard soils. Overall, our study revealed that soil perturbation due to intensive cropping reduces strongly the complexity of bacterial network although the richness is increased. Moreover, the hub genera within the bacterial community shifted from copiotrophic taxa in forest soils to more oligotrophic taxa in agricultural soils.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30846759
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40422-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-40422-y
pmc: PMC6405751
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3812Références
ISME J. 2016 Feb;10(2):389-99
pubmed: 26172208
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013 Nov;37(6):936-54
pubmed: 23550883
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Jul 16;10(8):538-50
pubmed: 22796884
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186766
pubmed: 29059218
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Aug;44:7-15
pubmed: 29289792
Microb Biotechnol. 2015 Jan;8(1):131-42
pubmed: 25195809
ISME J. 2012 Feb;6(2):343-51
pubmed: 21900968
Microbiologyopen. 2015 Jun;4(3):518-31
pubmed: 25922908
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 3;104(27):11436-40
pubmed: 17592124
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):926-36
pubmed: 27264635
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018 Apr;42:104-109
pubmed: 29197823
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1354-64
pubmed: 17601128
mBio. 2015 Jan 27;6(1):
pubmed: 25626903
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1434
pubmed: 23385579
Front Microbiol. 2014 May 20;5:219
pubmed: 24904535
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jun;18(6):2039-51
pubmed: 26914164
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jan;18(1):205-18
pubmed: 26177312
Geobiology. 2013 Jul;11(4):356-76
pubmed: 23679065
Microb Ecol. 2018 May;75(4):1063-1073
pubmed: 29018902
ISME J. 2016 Aug;10(8):1891-901
pubmed: 26771927
ISME J. 2011 Sep;5(9):1414-25
pubmed: 21430787
Front Microbiol. 2012 Dec 19;3:417
pubmed: 23267351
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1611-5
pubmed: 23449999
Nat Commun. 2017 Feb 08;8:14349
pubmed: 28176768
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5875
pubmed: 29651160
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016 Jun;31:227-234
pubmed: 27232202
BMC Genomics. 2016 Jan 14;17:55
pubmed: 26763898
Trends Microbiol. 2014 Feb;22(2):84-91
pubmed: 24440178
Ecology. 2018 Mar;99(3):690-699
pubmed: 29336480
Nature. 2009 May 14;459(7244):193-9
pubmed: 19444205
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017 Sep 1;41(5):599-623
pubmed: 28961933
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Sep;29(4):795-811
pubmed: 16102603
Mol Ecol. 2014 Jul;23(13):3341-55
pubmed: 24888892
Sci Adv. 2018 Jul 04;4(7):eaat1808
pubmed: 29978046