Patient Preferences for GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Cardiovascular (CV) disease risk
Discrete choice experiment
Patient preference
Type 2 diabetes (T2D)
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
18
12
2018
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
9
3
2019
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) are increasing in Japan, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are commonly used to treat the disease. The objective of this study was to use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to characterize patient preferences for clinical treatment features of two GLP-1 RAs-dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 0.50 mg-among patients with T2D in Japan. Adult patients with T2D in Japan were administered the DCE via a web-based survey. The DCE examined patient preferences for five treatment attributes (each described by two or three levels), including method of administration, HbA1c change, reduction in cardiovascular (CV) risk, weight change, and common side effects (i.e., nausea). Results were analyzed using multinomial and mixed logit models, and predicted choice probability was calculated to determine the overall probability that either dulaglutide or semaglutide DCE levels were preferred. One DCE choice task included a direct comparison of the dulaglutide 0.75 mg versus semaglutide 0.50 mg treatment profiles. 190 subjects completed the survey; 29 were excluded after failing the predefined internal validity assessments. In the final analysis sample (N = 161), the attribute with the largest effect on the subjects' choices was reduction in CV risk, followed by HbA1c change and common side effects. Patients' predicted choice probability for the semaglutide profile was 78%, versus 22% for the dulaglutide profile. 28% of patients were "very willing" to initiate treatment with semaglutide's product profile, versus 6% for dulaglutide. In this study, reduction in CV risk and HbA1c change were the key drivers of GLP-1 RA medication preference in Japanese patients with T2D. Overall, the majority of the patients preferred a product with attribute levels reflecting the semaglutide 0.50 mg profile, with a known CV risk reduction benefit and superior HbA1c reduction. Novo Nordisk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30847838
doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0591-9
pii: 10.1007/s13300-019-0591-9
pmc: PMC6437254
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
735-749Références
Int J Hypertens. 2013;2013:653789
pubmed: 23533715
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;6(4):275-286
pubmed: 29397376
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Oct;17(10):974-83
pubmed: 26179187
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844
pubmed: 27633186
J Med Econ. 2010;13(4):655-61
pubmed: 21034377
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(2):251-62
pubmed: 26549576
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1202-1212
pubmed: 29322610
Diabetes Ther. 2015 Mar;6(1):75-84
pubmed: 25586555
Med Decis Making. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):37-44
pubmed: 11206945
Drugs Context. 2015 Jul 09;4:212283
pubmed: 26213556
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1193-9
pubmed: 23404305
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Sep;15(9):802-9
pubmed: 23464623
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(23):476
pubmed: 29285509
J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Mar 26;:
pubmed: 29582574
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Sep;32(9):1477-8
pubmed: 27181181
Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):588-94
pubmed: 15343421
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59
pubmed: 18539917
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):378-388
pubmed: 28786547
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Nov;32(8):776-790
pubmed: 27102969
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):42-49
pubmed: 28573765
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jul 25;10:1337-48
pubmed: 27524889
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Nov 09;9:1611-22
pubmed: 26635470