Relationship between atrial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Action Potentials
Aged
Atrial Fibrillation
/ diagnosis
Atrial Remodeling
Catheter Ablation
/ adverse effects
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac
Female
Fibrosis
Heart Atria
/ diagnostic imaging
Heart Rate
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Veins
/ physiopathology
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
atrial fibrillation
cardiac magnetic resonance
catheter ablation
pulmonary vein reconnection
scar
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
30
10
2018
revised:
22
01
2019
accepted:
10
02
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
20
8
2020
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is frequent in patients showing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PV isolation (PVI). Its detection with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may help predict outcome and guide redo procedures. We assessed the relationship between scar on CMR and PV reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. Fifty-one patients with paroxysmal AF underwent CMR before PVI using either a conventional single-electrode catheter (N = 28) or a circular multielectrode catheter (N = 23). At 3 months, a second CMR study was performed, followed by a systematic electrophysiological procedure to look for PV reconnection, regardless of AF recurrence. Preablation fibrosis and postablation scar were quantified and mapped from late gadolinium-enhanced CMR. CMR results were compared to the distribution and extent of PV reconnection. CMR and electrophysiological findings were compared between catheter types. Three months after successful PVI, scar gaps were found in 39 (76%) patients, and 78 (39%) veins. Electrical PV reconnection was detected in 45 (88%) patients, and 99 (50%) veins. The extent of PV reconnection related closely to the number of gaps (R = 0.55; P < .001), and to scar burden (R = -0.63; P < .001). However, the agreement was only fair for the localization of PV reconnection (k = 0.37; P < .001), scar gaps particularly lacking sensitivity in areas of pre-existing fibrosis. The circular catheter was associated with shorter procedures (P < .001), more scar (P = .01), less gaps (P = .01), and less reconnected veins (P = .03). PV reconnection is extremely frequent after PVI. CMR scar imaging accurately predicts its extent, but poorly predicts its location. Multielectrode circular catheters induce more complete ablation.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
727-740Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : ERC n°715093
Pays : International
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 715093
Pays : International
Organisme : l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
ID : LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04
Pays : International
Organisme : l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
ID : MUSIC ANR-11-EQPX-0030
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.