Subacute fatigue in primary care - two sides of the story.
Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Cohort Studies
Fatigue
/ diagnosis
Feasibility Studies
Female
General Practitioners
/ psychology
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
/ statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care
/ methods
Qualitative Research
Referral and Consultation
Retrospective Studies
Subacute Care
/ methods
fatigue
primary care
qualitative
Journal
British journal of health psychology
ISSN: 2044-8287
Titre abrégé: Br J Health Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9605409
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
16
07
2018
revised:
31
01
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
1
8
2019
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fatigue is a common symptom in primary care. Chronic fatigue research highlights the value of preventing chronicity, but little research has investigated the early, subacute stage of the fatigue trajectory (<3 months). We aimed to examine patient and general practitioner (GP) perspectives of subacute fatigue in primary care: (1) to gain a better understanding of fatigue during this stage and (2) to explore how management could be improved. A qualitative study design was used. In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 14 patients and 14 GPs (non-dyadic), recruited from 19 primary care practices. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed. Initially, patient and GP accounts were analysed separately, before themes were merged to identify shared and independent perspectives. Three main themes were identified. Within these, subthemes from patients', GPs', or shared patient/GP perspectives emerged. The main themes encompassed the following: (1) Change from normal - the impact of fatigue; (2) The challenges of managing fatigue; and (3) The consultation GPs' knowledge was often not reflected in patients' accounts, even for those reporting positive experiences, suggesting knowledge was not effectively translated. Some findings, such as impact, mirror those described in chronic fatigue. New insights into early-stage fatigue management also arose, including mismatches in patient and GP perceptions on negative tests and not re-presenting. These highlight the need for better communication and shared understanding. GPs should pre-emptively present a biopsychosocial model of fatigue and keep communication channels open, particularly in the light of negative physiological tests. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Patients with chronic fatigue retrospectively report lack of understanding from GPs in early stage of illness. Little research has investigated the early stages of the fatigue trajectory. What does this study add? Consequences of an episode of subacute fatigue are similar to those reported for CFS. There is discordance between GPs' positive view of negative tests and patients' need for explanation of symptoms. The length of appointments is a significant barrier for creating shared understanding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30848557
doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12361
pmc: PMC6519220
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
419-442Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-DG-1213-10001
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(12):1859-64
pubmed: 11352411
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Aug;57(4):711-20
pubmed: 12821018
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Mar;54(500):165-70
pubmed: 15006120
BMJ. 2004 Jun 5;328(7452):1354-7
pubmed: 15169743
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;49(10):663-72
pubmed: 15560312
QJM. 2006 Jan;99(1):49-55
pubmed: 16330509
Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;27(7):781-97
pubmed: 17822818
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Apr;64(4):335-49
pubmed: 18374732
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;6(6):519-27
pubmed: 19001304
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;15(2):267-83
pubmed: 20179018
BMJ. 2010 Aug 24;341:c4259
pubmed: 20736254
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23-24):2255-63
pubmed: 21473686
Ochsner J. 2010 Spring;10(1):38-43
pubmed: 21603354
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Sep 21;13:93
pubmed: 22998151
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):407-16
pubmed: 23440131
Front Physiol. 2013 Apr 05;4:63
pubmed: 23576989
J R Soc Med. 2015 Mar;108(3):84-8
pubmed: 25389231
Mil Med. 2015 Jul;180(7):721-3
pubmed: 26126237
BMC Nurs. 2015 Nov 28;14:64
pubmed: 26617466
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Aug;99:120-129
pubmed: 28712416
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902
pubmed: 29118053
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Jun;33(5):535-44
pubmed: 7598674
Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1333-8
pubmed: 7752755
J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53
pubmed: 8463991
BMJ. 1999 Feb 6;318(7180):372-6
pubmed: 9933202