Cost-Effectiveness of Limited Vitrectomy for Vision-Degrading Myodesopsia.


Journal

American journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1879-1891
Titre abrégé: Am J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 27 09 2018
revised: 17 02 2019
accepted: 22 02 2019
pubmed: 9 3 2019
medline: 7 3 2020
entrez: 9 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients afflicted with clinically significant vitreous floaters suffer from vision-degrading myodesopsia, characterized by impairment in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and decreased quality of life. This study determined the cost-effectiveness of limited vitrectomy for this condition. Retrospective, interventional case series and third-party insurer cost-utility analysis. Sixty-seven patients suffering from unilateral vitreous floaters (20 non-myopic patients with posterior vitreous detachment [PVD]; 17 myopic patients [>-2 diopters] without PVD; 30 myopic patients with PVD) completed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) and were tested with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CSF measurements before and after limited vitrectomy. A reference case cost-utility analysis was performed. The mean VFQ-39 increased 19% (P < 0.00001) after surgery, with general vision improving 27% for the entire group and 37% for non-myopic PVD (P < 0.00001 for each). VFQ-39 correlations with time tradeoff utilities indicated a 14.4% improvement in quality of life. Mean BCVA improved 13.5% postoperatively (P < 0.00001) and CSF improved 53% (P < 0.00001). The incremental patient value gain conferred by limited vitrectomy was 2.38 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the average cost-utility ratio in 2018 U.S. real dollars was $1,574/QALY. Limited vitrectomy for vision-degrading myodesopsia is clinically effective, in that it improves BCVA, CSF, and patient well-being. It is also highly cost-effective ($1,574/QALY), with an average cost-utility ratio vs. no therapy that is superior to cataract surgery ($2,262/QALY), amblyopia therapy ($2,710/QALY), and retinal detachment repair ($45,304/QALY). Myopic patients without PVD had the lowest cost-utility ratio of all ($1,338/QALY).

Identifiants

pubmed: 30849342
pii: S0002-9394(19)30091-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.032
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-6

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Benjamin Rostami (B)

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Jeannie Nguyen-Cuu (J)

VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, USA.

Gary Brown (G)

Center for Value Based Medicine, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA; Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Melissa Brown (M)

Center for Value Based Medicine, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA; Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Alfredo A Sadun (AA)

Doheny Eye Institute, UCLA, Pasadena, California, USA.

J Sebag (J)

VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, California, USA; Doheny Eye Institute, UCLA, Pasadena, California, USA. Electronic address: jsebag@VMRinstitute.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH