Five-year clinical outcomes and intracoronary imaging findings of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial: randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Absorbable Implants
Acute Disease
Coronary Restenosis
/ epidemiology
Drug-Eluting Stents
/ adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Metals
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Polymers
Prosthesis Design
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
/ physiopathology
Sirolimus
/ analogs & derivatives
Stents
/ adverse effects
Thrombosis
/ epidemiology
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ methods
Coronary artery disease
Drug-eluting stent
Restenosis
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Stent
Stent thrombosis
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 06 2019
21 06 2019
Historique:
received:
10
09
2018
revised:
05
11
2018
accepted:
06
02
2019
pubmed:
10
3
2019
medline:
7
10
2020
entrez:
10
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The long-term outcomes of biolimus-eluting stents (BESs) with biodegradable polymer as compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain unknown. We performed a 5-year clinical follow-up of 1157 patients (BES: N = 575 and BMS: N = 582) included in the randomized COMFORTABLE AMI trial. Serial intracoronary imaging of stented segments using both intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography performed at baseline and 13 months follow-up were analysed in 103 patients. At 5 years, BES reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events [MACE; hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.79, P = 0.001], driven by lower risks for target vessel-related reinfarction (HR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.87, P = 0.02) and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.25-0.66, P < 0.001). Definite stent thrombosis (ST) was recorded in 2.2% and 3.9% (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.28-1.16, P = 0.12) with no differences in rates of very late definite ST (1.3% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.77). Optical coherence tomography showed no difference in the frequency of malapposed stent struts at follow-up (BES 0.08% vs. BMS 0.02%, P = 0.10). Uncovered stent struts were rarely observed but more frequent in BES (2.1% vs. 0.15%, P < 0.001). In the IVUS analysis, there was no positive remodelling in either group (external elastic membrane area change BES: -0.63 mm2, 95% CI: -1.44 to 0.39 vs. BMS -1.11 mm2, 95% CI: -2.27 to 0.04, P = 0.07). Compared with BMS, the implantation of biodegradable polymer-coated BES resulted in a lower 5-year rate of MACE in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. At 13 months, vascular healing in treated culprit lesions was almost complete irrespective of stent type. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00962416.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30851032
pii: 5372331
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz074
doi:
Substances chimiques
Metals
0
Polymers
0
Sirolimus
W36ZG6FT64
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00962416']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Webcast
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1909-1919Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.