Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.
Absorbable Implants
Aged
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Thrombosis
/ epidemiology
Diabetes Mellitus
/ diagnosis
Europe
/ epidemiology
Everolimus
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
/ epidemiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Bioresorbable scaffold
Coronary artery disease
Diabetes mellitus
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Scaffold thrombosis
Journal
Cardiovascular diabetology
ISSN: 1475-2840
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diabetol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147637
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 03 2019
09 03 2019
Historique:
received:
03
01
2019
accepted:
18
02
2019
entrez:
11
3
2019
pubmed:
11
3
2019
medline:
24
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains challenging even with modern drug-eluting stents (DES) due to high rates of repeat revascularization. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (EE-BRS) might allow for repeat intervention prolonging the time interval of percutaneous treatment options. The ABSORB DM Benelux Study is a dedicated prospective, international study to evaluate the midterm safety and efficacy of EE-BRS in DM patients. All DM patients that received ≥ 1 EE-BRS for any indication were enrolled and prospectively followed. Study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR); target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel MI, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), as well as definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT). Between April 2015 till March 2017, 150 DM patients and 188 lesions were treated and followed up to 3 years. Device implantation success was 100%. MACE occurred in 15.2% (event rate of 8.8 per 100 PY). TLF was reported in 11.7% (7.0 events per 100 PY). CD, target vessel MI, ischemic-driven TLR occurred in 3.4%, 3.6% and 5.5% respectively, while ScT was observed in 1.4%. There were no occurrences of late or very late ScT. EE-BRS treatment in DM patients shows comparable midterm safety and efficacy outcomes when historically compared with modern DES. New-generation EE-BRS might offer an attractive alternative to metallic DES in treatment of fast progressing atherosclerosis population as in DM patients. Trial registration NTR5447. Registered 05 October 2015, retrospectively registered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains challenging even with modern drug-eluting stents (DES) due to high rates of repeat revascularization. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (EE-BRS) might allow for repeat intervention prolonging the time interval of percutaneous treatment options.
METHODS
The ABSORB DM Benelux Study is a dedicated prospective, international study to evaluate the midterm safety and efficacy of EE-BRS in DM patients. All DM patients that received ≥ 1 EE-BRS for any indication were enrolled and prospectively followed. Study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR); target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel MI, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), as well as definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT).
RESULTS
Between April 2015 till March 2017, 150 DM patients and 188 lesions were treated and followed up to 3 years. Device implantation success was 100%. MACE occurred in 15.2% (event rate of 8.8 per 100 PY). TLF was reported in 11.7% (7.0 events per 100 PY). CD, target vessel MI, ischemic-driven TLR occurred in 3.4%, 3.6% and 5.5% respectively, while ScT was observed in 1.4%. There were no occurrences of late or very late ScT.
CONCLUSION
EE-BRS treatment in DM patients shows comparable midterm safety and efficacy outcomes when historically compared with modern DES. New-generation EE-BRS might offer an attractive alternative to metallic DES in treatment of fast progressing atherosclerosis population as in DM patients. Trial registration NTR5447. Registered 05 October 2015, retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30851731
doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0827-z
pii: 10.1186/s12933-019-0827-z
pmc: PMC6408833
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
Banques de données
NTR
['NTR5447']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25Références
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):962-8
pubmed: 10895847
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Aug;36(2):355-65
pubmed: 10933343
Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):407-14
pubmed: 14747221
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Dec 7;44(11):2149-56
pubmed: 15582312
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Apr 17;49(15):1600-6
pubmed: 17433949
Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51
pubmed: 17470709
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 20;50(21):2029-36
pubmed: 18021868
Circulation. 2008 Apr 15;117(15):1945-54
pubmed: 18378618
Lancet. 2009 Mar 14;373(9667):897-910
pubmed: 19286089
Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3198-206
pubmed: 19528338
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14
pubmed: 19896746
EuroIntervention. 2010 Sep;6(4):447-53
pubmed: 20884431
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1229-39
pubmed: 21232716
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 12;58(3):258-64
pubmed: 21737016
Circulation. 2011 Aug 23;124(8):893-900
pubmed: 21824922
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 4;58(15):1578-88
pubmed: 21958884
EuroIntervention. 2012 Jan;7(9):1060-1
pubmed: 21959320
Am Heart J. 2012 May;163(5):867-875.e1
pubmed: 22607866
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 16;60(16):1581-98
pubmed: 22958960
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84
pubmed: 23121323
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):629-38
pubmed: 23439102
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):999-1009
pubmed: 24156961
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;103(2):137-49
pubmed: 24630390
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2111-2118
pubmed: 24632279
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5):null
pubmed: 25969547
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):1041-144
pubmed: 26204990
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 12;16:38
pubmed: 26868826
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67(8):921-31
pubmed: 26916481
Circulation. 2016 May 3;133(18):1772-82
pubmed: 26994121
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 14;67(23):2732-2740
pubmed: 27046160
EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 20;12(9):1090-1101
pubmed: 27597270
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2479-2491
pubmed: 27806897
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):42-49
pubmed: 28017311
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:136-141
pubmed: 28038806
EuroIntervention. 2017 Apr 20;12(17):2110-2117
pubmed: 28246060
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 1;38(33):2559-2566
pubmed: 28430908
Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):464-479
pubmed: 29089314
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862
pubmed: 29100702
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2863-2874
pubmed: 29100704
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 10;18(1):92
pubmed: 29743023
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jul 20;14(4):e426-e433
pubmed: 29786537
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Aug 14;17(1):114
pubmed: 30107794
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):E1-E7
pubmed: 30286520
EuroIntervention. 2018 Oct 30;:null
pubmed: 30375335
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;112(2):113-123
pubmed: 30630761
Diabetes Care. 1979 Mar-Apr;2(2):120-6
pubmed: 520114
Circulation. 1997 Sep 16;96(6):1761-9
pubmed: 9323059
Diabetes Care. 1998 Jul;21(7):1138-45
pubmed: 9653609
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34
pubmed: 9673301