Punishment-related memory-guided attention: Neural dynamics of perceptual modulation.
Adult
Association Learning
/ physiology
Attention
/ physiology
Attentional Bias
/ physiology
Brain
/ physiology
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Memory
/ physiology
Photic Stimulation
Punishment
/ psychology
Reaction Time
/ physiology
Space Perception
/ physiology
Spatial Memory
/ physiology
Visual Perception
/ physiology
Young Adult
Event-related potentials
Long-term memory
Punishment
Visuospatial attention
Journal
Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior
ISSN: 1973-8102
Titre abrégé: Cortex
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0100725
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
04
06
2018
revised:
03
10
2018
accepted:
30
01
2019
pubmed:
11
3
2019
medline:
4
9
2020
entrez:
11
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Remembering the outcomes of past experiences allows us to generate future expectations and shape selection in the long-term. A growing number of studies has shown that learned positive reward values impact spatial memory-based attentional biases on perception. However, whether memory-driven attentional biases extend to punishment-related values has received comparatively less attention. Here, we manipulated whether recent spatial contextual memories became associated with successful avoidance of punishment (potential monetary loss). Behavioral and electrophysiological measures were collected from 27 participants during a subsequent memory-based attention task, in which we tested for the effect of punishment avoidance associations. Punishment avoidance significantly amplified effects of spatial contextual memories on visual search processes within natural scenes. Compared to non-associated scenes, contextual memories paired with punishment avoidance lead to faster responses to targets presented at remembered locations. Event-related potentials elicited by target stimuli revealed that acquired motivational value of specific spatial locations, by virtue of their association with past avoidance of punishment, dynamically affected neural signatures of early visual processing (indexed by larger P1 and earlier N1 potentials) and target selection (as indicated by reduced N2pc potentials). The present results extend our understanding of how memory, attention, and punishment-related mechanisms interact to optimize perceptual decision in real world environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30852377
pii: S0010-9452(19)30049-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.029
pmc: PMC6525146
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
231-245Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 104571/Z/14/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Cereb Cortex. 2000 Dec;10(12):1233-41
pubmed: 11073872
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Feb;17(2):284-93
pubmed: 16514108
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11096-103
pubmed: 20720117
J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 28;32(48):17382-90
pubmed: 23197729
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:27-33
pubmed: 28572059
Neuroscientist. 2012 Oct;18(5):502-15
pubmed: 21636849
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-11
pubmed: 25139941
Psychol Sci. 2012 Apr;23(4):359-63
pubmed: 22399415
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Feb;25(2):245-57
pubmed: 23066690
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):245-51
pubmed: 19175756
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Oct;51(12):2469-77
pubmed: 24139823
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;99(3):225-34
pubmed: 8862112
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Nov;18(11):2604-13
pubmed: 18308706
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):887-897
pubmed: 26427645
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Aug 1;28(8):2935-2947
pubmed: 28968648
Behav Brain Res. 1995 Nov;71(1-2):113-23
pubmed: 8747179
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 7;109(6):E360-7
pubmed: 22109554
Neuron. 2005 Feb 3;45(3):459-67
pubmed: 15694331
J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 18;34(25):8594-604
pubmed: 24948813
Neuron. 2006 Mar 16;49(6):905-16
pubmed: 16543137
Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):507-17
pubmed: 16675403
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2253-65
pubmed: 27146992
J Vis. 2013 Apr 15;13(3):
pubmed: 23589803
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Dec;24(12):2281-91
pubmed: 23016670
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):760-75
pubmed: 18564048
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(4):687-94
pubmed: 24899117
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 29;106(39):16841-6
pubmed: 19805383
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e103372
pubmed: 25080218
Curr Biol. 2016 Feb 22;26(4):550-5
pubmed: 26877079
Neuroimage. 2010 Jun;51(2):859-66
pubmed: 20302948
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):281-6
pubmed: 23623264
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):222-7
pubmed: 16507062
Brain Res. 2015 May 5;1606:86-94
pubmed: 25701717
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):981-8
pubmed: 19549080
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:466-474
pubmed: 28416452
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1257-70
pubmed: 9770220
Neuron. 2015 Feb 4;85(3):512-8
pubmed: 25654257
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:116-123
pubmed: 27153978
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):536-42
pubmed: 20702874
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):264-73
pubmed: 25559653
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Apr;1369(1):24-39
pubmed: 26595376
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Nov;27(11):2229-39
pubmed: 26151604
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):6-27
pubmed: 27362267
Vision Res. 2013 Jun 7;85:58-72
pubmed: 23262054
Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Mar 30;3:4
pubmed: 19434242
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):464-72
pubmed: 20829095
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Apr;28(4):529-41
pubmed: 26741800
Cell. 2015 Nov 19;163(5):1165-1175
pubmed: 26590420
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Dec;16(12):1879-87
pubmed: 24212672
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):560-9
pubmed: 25995350
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jun 11;12:396
pubmed: 29942248
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 2;37(31):7297-7304
pubmed: 28630254
Curr Opin Neurol. 2015 Feb;28(1):29-35
pubmed: 25490197
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):146-156
pubmed: 28031455
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):5000-5
pubmed: 24639493
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;29(6):968-979
pubmed: 28129056
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;88(4):2088-95
pubmed: 12364530
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 27;115(9):E2135-E2144
pubmed: 29437980
Cereb Cortex. 2014 May;24(5):1319-31
pubmed: 23314939
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):778-84
pubmed: 19422618
Vis cogn. 2015;23(1-2):272-290
pubmed: 26190929
J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 19;31(42):14952-60
pubmed: 22016528
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
pubmed: 7964526
Brain Res. 2014 Oct 31;1587:88-96
pubmed: 25171805
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1219-36
pubmed: 21185861
J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 11;28(24):6202-10
pubmed: 18550762
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3459-69
pubmed: 20688087
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):701-7
pubmed: 24488806
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Apr;2(4):364-9
pubmed: 10204544
Nature. 1994 Dec 8;372(6506):543-6
pubmed: 7990926
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 24;29(25):8032-8
pubmed: 19553443
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 16;5(9):
pubmed: 20862327
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jan;7(1):54-64
pubmed: 16371950
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 27;32(26):8969-76
pubmed: 22745496
Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):190-203
pubmed: 10731769
Cereb Cortex. 2016 May;26(5):2059-2073
pubmed: 25750253
Brain Res. 2013 Sep 26;1532:32-43
pubmed: 23916733
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Dec;15(12):1855-65
pubmed: 15746002
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):514-538
pubmed: 28986770
Vis cogn. 2015;23(1-2):67-81
pubmed: 26069450
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 25;37(43):10438-10450
pubmed: 28951452
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Mar 04;8:24
pubmed: 24624062
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10367-71
pubmed: 21646524