Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Rat Claustrum.
anterior cingulate cortex
caudate
cortex
forebrain
insula
putamen
striatum
top-down
Journal
Frontiers in neuroanatomy
ISSN: 1662-5129
Titre abrégé: Front Neuroanat
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477943
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2018
accepted:
06
02
2019
entrez:
12
3
2019
pubmed:
12
3
2019
medline:
12
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The claustrum is structurally connected with many cortical areas.A major hurdle standing in the way of understanding claustrum function is the difficulty in assessing the global functional connectivity (FC) of this structure. The primary issues lie in the inability to isolate claustrum signal from the adjacent insular cortex (Ins), caudate/putamen (CPu), and endopiriform nucleus (Endo). To address this issue, we used (7T) fMRI in the rat and describe a novel analytic method to study claustrum without signal contamination from the surrounding structures. Using this approach, we acquired claustrum signal distinct from Ins, CPu, and Endo, and used this claustrum signal to determine whole brain resting state functional connectivity (RSFC). Claustrum RSFC was distinct from the adjacent structures and displayed extensive connections with sensory cortices and the cingulate cortex, consistent with known structural connectivity of the claustrum. These results suggest fMRI and improved analysis can be combined to accurately assay claustrum function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30853902
doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00022
pmc: PMC6395398
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
22Subventions
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : K22 AA021414
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM008181
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCCIH NIH HHS
ID : R01 AT007176
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AA024845
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : T32 NS063391
Pays : United States
Références
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2000;59(2):77-83
pubmed: 10859879
Neural Netw. 2000 Oct-Nov;13(8-9):861-70
pubmed: 11156197
Med Image Anal. 2002 Dec;6(4):389-405
pubmed: 12494949
J Neurophysiol. 1956 Jul;19(4):325-39
pubmed: 13332440
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Aug;27(8):468-74
pubmed: 15271494
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 29;360(1458):1271-9
pubmed: 16147522
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jul 5;422(1):77-80
pubmed: 17597301
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):72-8
pubmed: 18403396
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):218-23
pubmed: 18469316
NMR Biomed. 2009 May;22(4):414-8
pubmed: 19003937
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct;19(10):2372-9
pubmed: 19168664
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Sep;28(7):995-1003
pubmed: 20456892
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 29;30(39):12902-7
pubmed: 20881109
J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16832-44
pubmed: 21159954
Behav Brain Res. 1990 Nov 30;40(3):169-92
pubmed: 2178346
NMR Biomed. 2013 Jun;26(6):638-50
pubmed: 23303725
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:417-24
pubmed: 24157920
Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:412-9
pubmed: 24412399
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 15;95:287-304
pubmed: 24657353
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:22-35
pubmed: 24657780
Neuroscience. 1989;29(3):503-37
pubmed: 2472578
Comput Math Methods Med. 2014;2014:973972
pubmed: 24734119
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Apr 04;8:48
pubmed: 24772070
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 02;9(12):e114227
pubmed: 25460595
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:333-344
pubmed: 25524649
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Apr 15;525(6):1347-1362
pubmed: 26801010
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Apr 15;525(6):1363-1380
pubmed: 26860547
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Apr 15;525(6):1421-1441
pubmed: 27038224
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Apr 15;525(6):1317-1346
pubmed: 27223051
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:609-625
pubmed: 27751941
Neuron. 2017 Aug 16;95(4):791-807.e7
pubmed: 28757305
Cell Rep. 2018 Jan 2;22(1):84-95
pubmed: 29298436
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:9-20
pubmed: 29414498
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 Jul;223(6):2999-3006
pubmed: 29623428
Front Neuroanat. 2018 Nov 26;12:100
pubmed: 30534060
J Neurosci. 1981 Sep;1(9):956-80
pubmed: 6169810
Nature. 1980 Dec 4;288(5790):479-81
pubmed: 7442793
J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):1072-84
pubmed: 9437027