Utility of EBUS-TBNA in PET-positive mediastinal lymph nodes in subjects with extra-thoracic malignancy.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 16 08 2018
accepted: 21 02 2019
entrez: 12 3 2019
pubmed: 12 3 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients with primary extra-thoracic malignancy (ETM) often have hyper-metabolic mediastinal lymph nodes (HM-MLN) in the PET-scan done for initial staging or post treatment follow-up. There is scant data on the etiology of HM-MLN in such patients, which can also be due to non-malignant causes. We used endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided sampling to determine the etiology of HM-MLN in patients with ETM and study the relationship between PET-SUV values and a diagnosis of malignancy in this population. 65 consecutive patients, from March 2013 to March 2017 with either known ETM for primary staging or post-treatment follow-up, with PET CT showing HM-MLN (SUV > 2.5) were included in the study. 65 patients with ETM had EBUS-TBNA for HM-MLN. 20/65 (30.7%) were malignant, 45/65 (69.23%) were benign MLN. In patients with benign etiology of HM-MLN, 6/45 (13.3%) had necrotising granulomatous, 24/45 (53.3%) had non- necrotising granulomatous MLN and 15/45 (33.3%) had reactive MLN. We found discordance (i.e. primary ETM responded to treatment and a new HM-MLN was detected) in 21/65 (32.3%) patients with PET-CT done for initial ETM staging, and 44/65 (67.7%) with a post-treatment PET-CT. showed. Correlating SUV with diagnoses, the SUV values in EBUS-proven malignant MLN were 8.9 ± 4.1, while they were 10.2 ± 5.57 in benign MLN. There was no statistically significant difference between the SUV of benign and malignant MLNs. This study shows a significant incidence of EBUS-TBNA proven benign diagnoses 45/65 (69.2%) in 'SUV-deemed-malignant MLN' and a poor relationship between high SUV and malignant MLN, in patients with known ETM. The ETM related HM-MLN have a significant chance of being benign, and a tissue diagnosis is imperative as it impacts on the treatment plan and prognosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIM
Patients with primary extra-thoracic malignancy (ETM) often have hyper-metabolic mediastinal lymph nodes (HM-MLN) in the PET-scan done for initial staging or post treatment follow-up. There is scant data on the etiology of HM-MLN in such patients, which can also be due to non-malignant causes. We used endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided sampling to determine the etiology of HM-MLN in patients with ETM and study the relationship between PET-SUV values and a diagnosis of malignancy in this population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
65 consecutive patients, from March 2013 to March 2017 with either known ETM for primary staging or post-treatment follow-up, with PET CT showing HM-MLN (SUV > 2.5) were included in the study.
RESULTS
65 patients with ETM had EBUS-TBNA for HM-MLN. 20/65 (30.7%) were malignant, 45/65 (69.23%) were benign MLN. In patients with benign etiology of HM-MLN, 6/45 (13.3%) had necrotising granulomatous, 24/45 (53.3%) had non- necrotising granulomatous MLN and 15/45 (33.3%) had reactive MLN. We found discordance (i.e. primary ETM responded to treatment and a new HM-MLN was detected) in 21/65 (32.3%) patients with PET-CT done for initial ETM staging, and 44/65 (67.7%) with a post-treatment PET-CT. showed. Correlating SUV with diagnoses, the SUV values in EBUS-proven malignant MLN were 8.9 ± 4.1, while they were 10.2 ± 5.57 in benign MLN. There was no statistically significant difference between the SUV of benign and malignant MLNs.
CONCLUSION
This study shows a significant incidence of EBUS-TBNA proven benign diagnoses 45/65 (69.2%) in 'SUV-deemed-malignant MLN' and a poor relationship between high SUV and malignant MLN, in patients with known ETM. The ETM related HM-MLN have a significant chance of being benign, and a tissue diagnosis is imperative as it impacts on the treatment plan and prognosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30856231
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213437
pii: PONE-D-18-24227
pmc: PMC6411147
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0213437

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Nucl Med. 1994 Nov;35(11):1771-6
pubmed: 7965154
Br J Cancer. 1986 Sep;54(3):467-73
pubmed: 3756082
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8348-56
pubmed: 16219937
Pathol Res Pract. 2004;200(10):701-5
pubmed: 15648607
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;135(3):615-9
pubmed: 18329480
Dermatology. 2009;219(1):25-31
pubmed: 19365109
Acta Oncol. 1991;30(3):301-8
pubmed: 2036238
Eur Respir J. 2010 Nov;36(5):1207-9
pubmed: 21037370
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2007 Sep;24(2):95-101
pubmed: 18496978
Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(6):1234-42
pubmed: 26775376
CMAJ. 1987 Sep 1;137(5):416-7
pubmed: 3040206
Cancer Treat Rev. 1986 Sep;13(3):147-56
pubmed: 3536088
J Dermatol. 1998 Sep;25(9):601-5
pubmed: 9798347
Ann Thorac Med. 2012 Oct;7(4):210-4
pubmed: 23189097
Ear Nose Throat J. 2006 Jun;85(6):397-9
pubmed: 16866119
J Assoc Physicians India. 2014 Jul;62(7):630-2
pubmed: 25672043
Gan. 1982 Jun;73(3):420-8
pubmed: 7129008
Lung Cancer. 2005 Dec;50(3):347-54
pubmed: 16171897
Pathol Oncol Res. 2004;10(3):169-71
pubmed: 15448754
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Mar;11(3):353-5
pubmed: 10333212
Korean J Radiol. 2006 Jan-Mar;7(1):57-69
pubmed: 16549957
Urol Oncol. 2010 Jul-Aug;28(4):350-4
pubmed: 19070517
Indian J Tuberc. 2010 Apr;57(2):104-7
pubmed: 21114180
Intern Med. 2011;50(21):2525-32
pubmed: 22041352
Respiration. 2000;67(1):90-3
pubmed: 10705270
Eur Urol. 1997;31 Suppl 1:47-55
pubmed: 9076486
Gen Diagn Pathol. 1997 Jun;142(5-6):347-52
pubmed: 9228259
Ann Oncol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1714-5
pubmed: 15972280
Acta Med Okayama. 2010 Dec;64(6):407-10
pubmed: 21173811
Cancer. 1998 Jul 15;83(2):337-43
pubmed: 9669817
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Mar;11(3):392-6
pubmed: 24592937
J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Jan;4(1):44-8
pubmed: 19096305
World J Surg Oncol. 2003 Apr 7;1(1):3
pubmed: 12773222
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005 Sep;30(5):580-2
pubmed: 16045699
Sarcoidosis. 1991 Mar;8(1):51-5
pubmed: 1669941
Acta radiol. 1957 May;47(5):381-92
pubmed: 13434994
Urology. 1993 Feb;41(2):157-9
pubmed: 8497990
Ann Thorac Med. 2011 Jan;6(1):11-6
pubmed: 21264165
Radiographics. 2014 Oct;34(6):1680-91
pubmed: 25310423
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010 May;41(3):608-13
pubmed: 20578549
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jan;22(1):127-31
pubmed: 20603434

Auteurs

Ravindra M Mehta (RM)

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bangalore, India.

Pavankumar Biraris (P)

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bangalore, India.

Shekhar Patil (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, HCG, Bangalore, India.

Abhinav Singla (A)

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bangalore, India.

Kumar Kallur (K)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, HCG, Bangalore, India.

Stefano Gasparini (S)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Department of Public Health, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Pulmonary Diseases Unit, Azienda "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH