Psychological interventions for ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

Psychological medicine
ISSN: 1469-8978
Titre abrégé: Psychol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1254142

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 13 3 2019
medline: 25 6 2020
entrez: 13 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The 11th revision to the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) identified complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) as a new condition. There is a pressing need to identify effective CPTSD interventions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), where participants were likely to have clinically significant baseline levels of one or more CPTSD symptom clusters (affect dysregulation, negative self-concept and/or disturbed relationships). We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and PILOTS databases (January 2018), and examined study and outcome quality. Fifty-one RCTs met inclusion criteria. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure alone (EA) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) were superior to usual care for PTSD symptoms, with effects ranging from g = -0.90 (CBT; k = 27, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.68; moderate quality) to g = -1.26 (EMDR; k = 4, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.51; low quality). CBT and EA each had moderate-large or large effects on negative self-concept, but only one trial of EMDR provided useable data. CBT, EA and EMDR each had moderate or moderate-large effects on disturbed relationships. Few RCTs reported affect dysregulation data. The benefits of all interventions were smaller when compared with non-specific interventions (e.g. befriending). Multivariate meta-regression suggested childhood-onset trauma was associated with a poorer outcome. The development of effective interventions for CPTSD can build upon the success of PTSD interventions. Further research should assess the benefits of flexibility in intervention selection, sequencing and delivery, based on clinical need and patient preferences.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The 11th revision to the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) identified complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) as a new condition. There is a pressing need to identify effective CPTSD interventions.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), where participants were likely to have clinically significant baseline levels of one or more CPTSD symptom clusters (affect dysregulation, negative self-concept and/or disturbed relationships). We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and PILOTS databases (January 2018), and examined study and outcome quality.
RESULTS
Fifty-one RCTs met inclusion criteria. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure alone (EA) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) were superior to usual care for PTSD symptoms, with effects ranging from g = -0.90 (CBT; k = 27, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.68; moderate quality) to g = -1.26 (EMDR; k = 4, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.51; low quality). CBT and EA each had moderate-large or large effects on negative self-concept, but only one trial of EMDR provided useable data. CBT, EA and EMDR each had moderate or moderate-large effects on disturbed relationships. Few RCTs reported affect dysregulation data. The benefits of all interventions were smaller when compared with non-specific interventions (e.g. befriending). Multivariate meta-regression suggested childhood-onset trauma was associated with a poorer outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
The development of effective interventions for CPTSD can build upon the success of PTSD interventions. Further research should assess the benefits of flexibility in intervention selection, sequencing and delivery, based on clinical need and patient preferences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30857567
pii: S0033291719000436
doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000436
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1761-1775

Auteurs

Thanos Karatzias (T)

Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care,Edinburgh,UK.

Philip Murphy (P)

Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care,Edinburgh,UK.

Marylene Cloitre (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Stanford University,California,USA.

Jonathan Bisson (J)

Cardiff University, School of Medicine,Cardiff,UK.

Neil Roberts (N)

Cardiff University, School of Medicine,Cardiff,UK.

Mark Shevlin (M)

Ulster University, School of Psychology,Derry,UK.

Philip Hyland (P)

National College of Ireland, School of Business,Dublin,Ireland.

Andreas Maercker (A)

Department of Psychology, Psychopathology and Clinical Interventions,University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.

Menachem Ben-Ezra (M)

School of Social Work, Ariel University,Ariel,Israel.

Peter Coventry (P)

Department of Health Sciences and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination,University of York,York,UK.

Susan Mason-Roberts (S)

Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care,Edinburgh,UK.

Aoife Bradley (A)

Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care,Edinburgh,UK.

Paul Hutton (P)

Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care,Edinburgh,UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH