The clinical relevance of multiple DPYD polymorphisms on patients candidate for fluoropyrimidine based-chemotherapy. An Italian case-control study.


Journal

British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 29 11 2018
accepted: 21 02 2019
revised: 20 02 2019
pubmed: 13 3 2019
medline: 28 2 2020
entrez: 13 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Deleterious polymorphisms in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD) may result in severe reduction of DPD enzymatic activity that causes life-threatening toxicities when the standard dose of fluorouracil is used. The best panel of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) of DPYD is not well defined. In 2011, we began screening DPYD*2A in patients candidate for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. We planned a case-control study with all cases of DPYD*2A wild type who developed toxicity ≥G3 and with a cohort of patients who did not present severe toxicities. Then, we tested the additional SNPs: c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.2194G>A. From 2011 to 2016, we screened 1827 patients for DPD deficiency; of those, 31 subjects (1.7%) showed DPYD*2A SNP. We selected 146 subjects who developed severe toxicities (Cases) and 220 patients who experienced no or mild toxicities (Controls); 53 patients carried one of the additional SNPs: 35 subjects (66%) fell into the Cases and 18 (34%) into the Controls (p < 0.0001). c.2194G>A was the most frequent SNP (12.5%) and showed a correlation with neutropenia. We confirmed that c.2846A>T and c.1679T>G were related to various toxicities. The additional DPYD polymorphisms could enhance the prevention of fluoropyrimidine toxicity. c.2194G>A is the most frequent polymorphism and it was found to be associated with neutropenia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Deleterious polymorphisms in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD) may result in severe reduction of DPD enzymatic activity that causes life-threatening toxicities when the standard dose of fluorouracil is used. The best panel of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) of DPYD is not well defined.
METHODS
In 2011, we began screening DPYD*2A in patients candidate for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. We planned a case-control study with all cases of DPYD*2A wild type who developed toxicity ≥G3 and with a cohort of patients who did not present severe toxicities. Then, we tested the additional SNPs: c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.2194G>A.
RESULTS
From 2011 to 2016, we screened 1827 patients for DPD deficiency; of those, 31 subjects (1.7%) showed DPYD*2A SNP. We selected 146 subjects who developed severe toxicities (Cases) and 220 patients who experienced no or mild toxicities (Controls); 53 patients carried one of the additional SNPs: 35 subjects (66%) fell into the Cases and 18 (34%) into the Controls (p < 0.0001). c.2194G>A was the most frequent SNP (12.5%) and showed a correlation with neutropenia. We confirmed that c.2846A>T and c.1679T>G were related to various toxicities.
CONCLUSIONS
The additional DPYD polymorphisms could enhance the prevention of fluoropyrimidine toxicity. c.2194G>A is the most frequent polymorphism and it was found to be associated with neutropenia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30858516
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0423-8
pii: 10.1038/s41416-019-0423-8
pmc: PMC6474277
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pyrimidines 0
Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP) EC 1.3.1.2
pyrimidine K8CXK5Q32L

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

834-839

Références

Longley, D. B., Harkin, D. P. & Johnston, P. G. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 330–338 (2003).
doi: 10.1038/nrc1074
Diasio, R. B. & Harris, B. E. Clinical pharmacology of 5-fluorouracil. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 16, 215–237 (1989).
doi: 10.2165/00003088-198916040-00002
Van Kuilenburg, A. B., van Lenthe, H., Blom, M. J., Mul, E. P. & Van Gennip, A. H. Profound variation in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in human blood cells: major implications for the detection of partly deficient patients. Br. J. Cancer 79, 620–626 (1999).
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690097
Raida, M. et al. Prevalence of a common point mutation in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene within the 5’-splice donor site of intron 14 in patients with severe 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- related toxicity compared with controls. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 2832–2839 (2001).
pubmed: 11555601
Del, Re. M. et al. Discovery of novel mutations in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene associated with toxicity of fluoropyrimidines and viewpoint on preemptive pharmacogenetic screening in patients. EPMA J. 6, 17 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s13167-015-0039-x
Lee, A. M. et al. DPYD variants as predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity in adjuvant colon cancer treatment (NCCTG N0147). J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 106, dju298 (2014).
pubmed: 25381393 pmcid: 4271081
Gentile, G. et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in 5-fluorouracil metabolism: a candidate DPYD haplotype to improve toxicity prediction. Pharmacogenomics J. 16, 320–325 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/tpj.2015.56
Henricks, L. M. et al. Translating DPYD genotype into DPD phenotype: using the DPYD gene activity score. Pharmacogenomics 16, 1277–1286 (2015).
doi: 10.2217/pgs.15.70
Toffoli, G. et al. Clinical validity of a DPYD-based pharmacogenetic test to predict severe toxicity to fluoropyrimidines. Int. J. Cancer 137, 2971–2980 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/ijc.29654
van Kuilenburg, A. B. et al. Lethal outcome of a patient with a complete dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency after administration of 5-fluorouracil: frequency of the common IVS14+1G>A mutation causing DPD deficiency. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 1149–1153 (2001).
pubmed: 11350878
van Kuilenburg, A. B., Meinsma, R., Zoetekouw, L. & Van Gennip, A. H. Increased risk of grade IV neutropenia after administration of 5-fluorouracil due to a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: high prevalence of the IVS14+1g>a mutation. Int. J. Cancer 10, 253–258 (2002).
doi: 10.1002/ijc.10599
Schwab, M. et al. Role of genetic and nongenetic factors for fluorouracil treatment related severe toxicity: a prospective clinical trial by the German 5-FU Toxicity Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2131–2138 (2008).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4182
Saif, M. W., Ezzeldin, H., Vance, K., Sellers, S. & Diasio, R. B. DPYD*2A mutation: the most common mutation associated with DPD deficiency. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 60, 503–507 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0392-5
Braun, M. S. et al. Association of molecular markers with toxicity outcomes in a randomized trial of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: the FOCUS trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 5519–5528 (2009).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6283
Offer, S. M., Wegner, N. J., Fossum, C., Wang, K. & Diasio, R. B. Phenotypic profiling of DPYD variations relevant to 5-fluorouracil sensitivity using real-time cellular analysis and in vitro measurement of enzyme activity. Cancer Res. 73, 1958–1968 (2013).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3858
Offer, S. M. et al. Comparative functional analysis of DPYD variants of potential clinical relevance to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Cancer Res. 74, 2545–2554 (2014).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2482
Meulendjiks, D. et al. Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 16, 1639–1650 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00286-7
Terrazzino, S. et al. DPYD IVS14+1G>A and 2846A>T genotyping for the prediction of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity: a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics 14, 1255–1272 (2013).
doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.116
Rosmarin, D. et al. Genetic markers of toxicity from capecitabine and other fluorouracil-based regimens: investigation in the QUASAR2 study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 1031–1039 (2014).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1857
Caudle, K. E. et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype and fluoropyrimidine dosing. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 94, 640–645 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.172
Deenen, M. J. et al. Upfront genotyping of DPYD*2A to individualize fluoropyrimidine therapy: a safety and cost analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 227–234 (2016).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1325
Meulendijks, D., Cats, A., Beijnen, J. H. & Schellens, J. H. Improving safety of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy by individualizing treatment based on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity-ready for clinical practice? Cancer Treat. Rev. 50, 23–34 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.08.002
Ruzzo, A. et al. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase pharmacogenetics for predicting fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in the randomised, phase III adjuvant TOSCA trial in high-risk colon cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer 117, 1269–1277 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.289
Boige, V. et al. DPYD genotyping to predict adverse events following treatment with flourouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer: a secondary analysis of the PETACC-8 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5392 (2016).
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5392
Deenen, M. J. et al. Relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes in DPYD and toxicity and efficacy of capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 3455–3468 (2011).
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2209

Auteurs

Francesco Iachetta (F)

Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy. francesco.iachetta@ausl.re.it.

Candida Bonelli (C)

Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Alessandra Romagnani (A)

Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Raffaella Zamponi (R)

Molecular Biology, Oncology and Advanced Technology Unit, Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Lorenzo Tofani (L)

Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Enrico Farnetti (E)

Molecular Biology, Oncology and Advanced Technology Unit, Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Davide Nicoli (D)

Molecular Biology, Oncology and Advanced Technology Unit, Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Angela Damato (A)

Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Maria Banzi (M)

Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Bruno Casali (B)

Molecular Biology, Oncology and Advanced Technology Unit, Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Carmine Pinto (C)

Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH