Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder.

Borderline personality disorder clinicians perspective mental health services patients perspective stigma

Journal

Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0567
Titre abrégé: J Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9212352

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Mar 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 14 3 2019
medline: 14 3 2019
entrez: 14 3 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

People with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience significant stigma, particularly at the interface of care delivery. To compare and contrast what stigma looks like within mental health care contexts, from the perspective of patients and mental health professionals (MHPs) and how it is perpetuated at the interface of care. A review of the literature was undertaken to compare the experiences of stigma towards BPD from the patient and MHP perspective by thematically analysing the results from empirical studies exploring their experiences. Thirty studies were found; 12 on patients perspectives and 18 on clinicians perspectives. Six themes arose from the thematic synthesis: (1) stigma related to diagnosis and disclosure; (2) perceived un-treatability; (3) stigma as a response to feeling powerless; (4) stigma due to preconceptions of patients; (5) low BPD health literacy and (6) overcoming stigma through enhanced empathy. A conceptual framework for explaining the perpetuation of stigma and BPD is proposed. Stigma towards people with BPD is perpetuated through poor BPD health literacy by patients and MHPs that stalls effective treatment and engagement, and disempowers all concerned, deferring responsibility to others. Addressing this stigma requires multiple strategies that include more targeted education, advocacy and leadership.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
People with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience significant stigma, particularly at the interface of care delivery.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To compare and contrast what stigma looks like within mental health care contexts, from the perspective of patients and mental health professionals (MHPs) and how it is perpetuated at the interface of care.
METHOD METHODS
A review of the literature was undertaken to compare the experiences of stigma towards BPD from the patient and MHP perspective by thematically analysing the results from empirical studies exploring their experiences.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty studies were found; 12 on patients perspectives and 18 on clinicians perspectives. Six themes arose from the thematic synthesis: (1) stigma related to diagnosis and disclosure; (2) perceived un-treatability; (3) stigma as a response to feeling powerless; (4) stigma due to preconceptions of patients; (5) low BPD health literacy and (6) overcoming stigma through enhanced empathy. A conceptual framework for explaining the perpetuation of stigma and BPD is proposed.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Stigma towards people with BPD is perpetuated through poor BPD health literacy by patients and MHPs that stalls effective treatment and engagement, and disempowers all concerned, deferring responsibility to others. Addressing this stigma requires multiple strategies that include more targeted education, advocacy and leadership.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30862201
doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581337
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-21

Auteurs

Daniel Ring (D)

a College of Medicine and Public Health , Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia.
b Department of Psychiatry , Margaret Tobin Centre Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia.

Sharon Lawn (S)

a College of Medicine and Public Health , Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia.
b Department of Psychiatry , Margaret Tobin Centre Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia.

Classifications MeSH