Impact of an oral nutrition protocol in patients treated with elective radical cystectomy: a long term follow-up.
Belgium
/ epidemiology
Case-Control Studies
Central Venous Catheters
/ adverse effects
Cost Savings
/ statistics & numerical data
Cystectomy
/ adverse effects
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Enteral Nutrition
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infections
/ epidemiology
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Nutrition Therapy
/ adverse effects
Parenteral Nutrition
/ economics
Postoperative Care
/ methods
Time Factors
Belgium
Catheter-related bloodstream infection
Costs
Length of stay
Oral nutrition protocol
Parenteral nutrition
Radical cystectomy
Journal
International journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN: 2210-7711
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101554912
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
20
06
2018
accepted:
19
02
2019
pubmed:
14
3
2019
medline:
19
11
2019
entrez:
14
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background After radical cystectomy, delayed return of bowel function is relatively common. Although studies investigating on the best modality for delivering nutritional support to this patient group are limited, parenteral nutrition was standard of care in those patients at the urological ward of the University Hospitals Leuven. In 2015, we published the findings from our study conducted in patients undergoing elective regular radical cystectomy at the urological ward of the University Hospitals Leuven comparing the length of hospital stay in patients with early postoperative parenteral nutrition (n = 48) versus an immediate oral nutrition protocol (n = 46). It was demonstrated that the implementation of an oral nutrition protocol was associated with a significant reduced length of hospital stay (median [IQR] of 18 [15-22] to 14 [13-18] days (p < 0.001)). The sample size was however too small to investigate the impact of the oral nutrition protocol on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, a common parenteral nutrition related complication. Objective To investigate the long term impact of an oral nutrition protocol on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, duration of catheterization and the length of hospital stay. Method Retrospectively, before (parenteral nutrition group) and after the implementation of the oral nutrition protocol (since March 10th 2010), two cohorts of 549 patients who underwent an elective regular radical cystectomy were included. The incidence of a catheter-related bloodstream infection and the length of stay were compared. A central venous catheter was present in every patient, which is standard of care. Results Catheter-related bloodstream infection was reduced from 22 (4%) to 10 (1.8%) (p = 0.031). The median duration of catheterization was 10 [7-13] days for the parenteral nutrition versus 7 [7-7] days for the oral nutrition group (p < 0.001). The median length of stay between both groups, 20 [17-25] before versus 17 [14-21] days after the implementation of the oral nutrition protocol, also differed significantly (p < 0.001). Implementing the oral nutrition protocol resulted in a parenteral nutrition associated cost saving of €470 per patient. Conclusion This large follow-up study showed that the oral nutrition protocol is associated with a reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infection. Besides, postponing parenteral nutrition in favour of oral nutrition enhances recovery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30864080
doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00800-y
pii: 10.1007/s11096-019-00800-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
408-413Références
Eur Urol. 2001 Jan;39(1):79-84
pubmed: 11173943
BJU Int. 2005 Oct;96(6):806-10
pubmed: 16153206
Urol Int. 2006;77(2):139-42
pubmed: 16888419
ANZ J Surg. 2007 Apr;77(4):265-9
pubmed: 17388833
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1107-11
pubmed: 17572196
Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul;17(1):41-8
pubmed: 17962014
Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):378-86
pubmed: 19464088
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):1-45
pubmed: 19489710
BJU Int. 2010 May;105(9):1199-201
pubmed: 20346056
Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1419-24
pubmed: 20472264
Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Jan-Feb;37(1):42-8
pubmed: 21385479
J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2207-12
pubmed: 21497841
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):475-82
pubmed: 22695241
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):335-40
pubmed: 23968966
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):50-5
pubmed: 24518775
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Apr;37(2):379-86
pubmed: 25666940
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):176-187
pubmed: 26970912
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Aug;41(6):918-928
pubmed: 28654308
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug 8;:null
pubmed: 28801130