Association Between Treatment Facility Volume, Therapy Types, and Overall Survival in Patients With Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.


Journal

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
ISSN: 1540-1413
Titre abrégé: J Natl Compr Canc Netw
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101162515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2019
Historique:
received: 23 04 2019
accepted: 12 09 2019
entrez: 14 3 2019
pubmed: 14 3 2019
medline: 17 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is significant heterogeneity in the treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the therapeutic and survival disparities in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC based on the facility volume using the National Cancer Database. Patients with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed from 2004 through 2015 were included. Facilities were classified by tertiles based on mean patients treated per year, with low-volume facilities treating ≤8 patients, intermediate-volume treating 9 to 14 patients, and high-volume treating ≥15 patients. Cox multivariate analysis was used to determine the volume-outcome relationship. Analysis included 83,673 patients treated at 1,319 facilities. Compared with patients treated at low-volume facilities, those treated at high-volume centers were more likely to be treated with surgical (25% vs 18%) and trimodality (12% vs 9%) therapies. In multivariate analysis, facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality (P<.0001). Median overall survival by facility volume was 15, 16, and 19 months for low-, intermediate-, and high-volume facilities, respectively (P<.001). Compared with patients treated at high-volume facilities, those treated at intermediate- and low-volume facilities had a significantly higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.11] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.13], respectively). Patients treated for stage IIIA NSCLC at high-volume facilities were more likely to receive surgical and trimodality therapies and had a significant improvement in survival.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is significant heterogeneity in the treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the therapeutic and survival disparities in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC based on the facility volume using the National Cancer Database.
METHODS
Patients with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed from 2004 through 2015 were included. Facilities were classified by tertiles based on mean patients treated per year, with low-volume facilities treating ≤8 patients, intermediate-volume treating 9 to 14 patients, and high-volume treating ≥15 patients. Cox multivariate analysis was used to determine the volume-outcome relationship.
RESULTS
Analysis included 83,673 patients treated at 1,319 facilities. Compared with patients treated at low-volume facilities, those treated at high-volume centers were more likely to be treated with surgical (25% vs 18%) and trimodality (12% vs 9%) therapies. In multivariate analysis, facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality (P<.0001). Median overall survival by facility volume was 15, 16, and 19 months for low-, intermediate-, and high-volume facilities, respectively (P<.001). Compared with patients treated at high-volume facilities, those treated at intermediate- and low-volume facilities had a significantly higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.11] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.13], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients treated for stage IIIA NSCLC at high-volume facilities were more likely to receive surgical and trimodality therapies and had a significant improvement in survival.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30865920
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7086
pii: jnccn18096
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

229-236

Auteurs

Anuhya Kommalapati (A)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and.
Palmetto Health USC Medical Group, Columbia, South Carolina; and.

Sri Harsha Tella (SH)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and.
Palmetto Health USC Medical Group, Columbia, South Carolina; and.

Adams Kusi Appiah (AK)

Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, and.

Lynette Smith (L)

Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, and.

Apar Kishor Ganti (AK)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, VA Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH