Effect of non-adhering dressings on promotion of fibroblast proliferation and wound healing in vitro.
Animals
Bandages
/ standards
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium
/ pharmacology
Cell Line
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Colloids
/ pharmacology
Cotton Fiber
Fibroblasts
/ cytology
Glycerol
/ pharmacology
Humans
Petrolatum
/ pharmacology
Polyesters
/ pharmacology
Silicones
/ pharmacology
Wound Healing
/ drug effects
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 03 2019
13 03 2019
Historique:
received:
27
09
2018
accepted:
21
02
2019
entrez:
15
3
2019
pubmed:
15
3
2019
medline:
30
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-adhering dressings are commonly used during granulation, tissue formation, and re-epithelialization. Elucidating cytotoxic effects and influence on proliferation/migration capacity of cells like fibroblasts is of interest. Dressings' effects were investigated by comprehensive in vitro approach: (1) MTT assay measuring cell viability after direct contact, (2) ATP assay determining effects on cell proliferation, and (3) scratch wound assay featuring an in vitro wound healing model. One cotton-based dressing with vaseline (vas) was included in the study and four polyester dressings containing vas and technology-lipido-colloid matrix (TLC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), hydrocolloid (HC), or glycerin (gly) as additives. A polyamide dressing with vas + CMC and three silicone-based dressings (AT, CC, M) were tested. Polyester + vas + CMC did not negatively affect cell viability or proliferation but it was found that fibroblast layers appeared more irregular with decreased F-actin network structure and tubulin density possibly leading to hampered scratch closure. Silicone AT, polyester + gly and polyamide + vas + CMC caused distinct cell damage. The latter two further reduced cell viability, proliferation and scratch healing. From the overall results, it can be concluded that cotton + vas, polyester + TLC, polyester + vas + HC and the silicone dressings CC and M have the potential to prevent damage of newly formed tissue during dressing changes and positively influence wound healing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30867534
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40921-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-40921-y
pmc: PMC6416289
doi:
Substances chimiques
Colloids
0
Polyesters
0
Silicones
0
Petrolatum
8009-03-8
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium
K679OBS311
Glycerol
PDC6A3C0OX
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4320Références
Int J Biol Macromol. 2013 Apr;55:88-97
pubmed: 23313451
J Int Med Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):1528-42
pubmed: 19930861
Br J Nurs. 2009 Jan 8-21;18(1):58-64
pubmed: 19127235
J Wound Care. 2005 Nov;14(10):490-1, 494-6
pubmed: 16304926
Burns. 2011 Sep;37(6):994-1000
pubmed: 21514733
Nurs Mirror Midwives J. 1970 Jul 31;131(5):36-7
pubmed: 5201800
Br J Community Nurs. 2009 Mar;14(3):S29-30, S32-4
pubmed: 19452665
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 02;10(7):e0131763
pubmed: 26134406
Br J Nurs. 2002 Sep;11(16 Suppl):S42-3, S46-50
pubmed: 12362152
Paediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;21(3):38-43
pubmed: 19397129
J Theor Biol. 2016 Jul 7;400:19-31
pubmed: 27086040
Burns. 2017 Aug;43(5):1002-1010
pubmed: 28325530
Front Biosci. 2004 Jan 01;9:283-9
pubmed: 14766366
J Wound Care. 2005 May;14(5):215-20
pubmed: 15909437
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(2):329-33
pubmed: 17406593
Arch Emerg Med. 1987 Jun;4(2):101-5
pubmed: 3304324
Eur J Cell Biol. 2007 Dec;86(11-12):747-61
pubmed: 17651862
J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 Mar;24(3):363-77
pubmed: 2318900
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2003 Apr;70(1):31-7
pubmed: 12745244
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7 Suppl):110S-118S; discussion 119S-120S
pubmed: 16799377
GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2008 Mar 11;3(1):Doc12
pubmed: 20204114
Burns. 2016 Jun;42(4):877-83
pubmed: 26847614
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;22(2):74-82
pubmed: 19188755