Adherence to Treatment and Follow-Up in Patients with Severe Chemical Eye Burns.

Adherence Alkali burn Ascorbic acid Chemical burns Chemical injuries Dua et al. classification Limbal ischemia Ocular burns Roper-Hall

Journal

Ophthalmology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8245
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101634502

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 17 01 2019
pubmed: 15 3 2019
medline: 15 3 2019
entrez: 15 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the demographics, acute management and compliance rates of severe chemical eye burn cases that presented to the largest eye hospital in the United Kingdom (UK). All patients presenting to the Moorfields Eye Hospital emergency department are registered on the electronic patient administration system (PAS). A search of the PAS for patients assigned a preset diagnosis of 'chemical injury' was performed for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2016. The results of the PAS search and handwritten clerking notes were reviewed. Eyes that were found to have ≥ 33% limbal ischaemia or limbal staining, or corneal haze that obscured the details of the iris, were recorded as having severe chemical injuries. 55 patients had mild chemical eye burns, and 11 eyes of 10 patients had severe burns. Average patient age was 37 years (SD 22 years) and 22 years (SD 10 years) for mild and severe chemical injuries, respectively. 53% of the mild injuries and 90% of the severe injuries were in males. 7 (70%) of the 10 severe injuries were assault-related. In the severe chemical injuries group, first presentation to the emergency department was 24 h or more postinjury in 50% of the patients, 33% stopped ascorbate and citrate drops (ocular pain), 40% stopped attending clinical follow-up sessions, and 45% of the eyes had a final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/18 or worse. A significant proportion of the severe ocular chemical burns were assault-related. Delayed presentation and poor treatment adherence and follow-up attendance rates are significant challenges in patients with severe chemical burns. Patient education and public health awareness are important strategies. These findings also raise the question of whether these patients, who are mostly young males, should be admitted to improve treatment adherence rates and visual outcome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30868417
doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0173-y
pii: 10.1007/s40123-019-0173-y
pmc: PMC6514011
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

251-259

Références

Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;85(11):1379-83
pubmed: 11673310
Burns. 2004 Sep;30(6):569-72
pubmed: 15302423
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;93(9):1177-80
pubmed: 19416936
Ophthalmology. 2010 Dec;117(12):2268-72
pubmed: 20591491
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:507-15
pubmed: 22114464
Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):287-300
pubmed: 22500544
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:207-14
pubmed: 26372619
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 1;134(10):1119-1124
pubmed: 27490908
Burns. 2018 Jun;44(4):1021-1022
pubmed: 29576343
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1965;85:631-53
pubmed: 5227208
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Dec;19(12):1526-9
pubmed: 7440108
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(4):281-4
pubmed: 7591189
Surv Ophthalmol. 1997 Jan-Feb;41(4):275-313
pubmed: 9104767

Auteurs

Mukhtar Bizrah (M)

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Western Eye Hospital, London, UK. m.bizrah@nhs.net.

Ammar Yusuf (A)

UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.

Sajjad Ahmad (S)

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH